Aug 7, 2020 · 20m · top-founders

Param Solutions hits $35k MRR helping People Get Gov Developer Jobs

Anil Kasablada · 11m spoken Nathan Latka · 6m spoken Eric Yuan · 4s spoken Vivek Bhaskaran · 2s spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Nathan Latka interviews Anil Kasablada, co-founder of Param Solutions, to explore how his bootstrapped company scaled to nearly $40,000 in monthly revenue by providing flat-fee recruitment and cleared staffing for defense and government contractors.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 35.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 5.3 Guest teaching 3.5 Guest disagreement 3.7 Nathan pushing back 6.2
05100:0010:0020:000:00–3:04 · Nathan as informed peer 4/10 Show Hook and GetLatka Subscription Promotion After an introductory ad read, Nathan challenges Anil immediately on whether his business is real SaaS or consulting, and pushes back on industry jargon by insisting Anil say jobs instead of requisitions.3:04–5:37 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Debating Fixed Monthly Fees versus Contingency Recruiting Models Nathan vigorously challenges Anil's claim that his subscription recruiting model puts skin in the game, pointing out that clients lose upfront monthly retainer fees if no hire is made, unlike traditional contingency recruiters.5:37–9:36 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Democratizing Talent Acquisition and Human-Driven Sourcing Nathan cuts off Anil's statistics to insist that upfront monthly fees remain sunk costs regardless of subsequent discounts. Nathan also catches Anil flat-footed when asking him to name direct competitors in the RPO space.9:36–12:28 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Revenue Breakdown Across RaaS and Government Staffing Clients Nathan drills down on the customer breakdown and questions why clients do not simply use Toptal. Anil schools Nathan on the structural requirements of government contracts requiring security clearances and US citizenship.12:30–15:08 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Team Composition, 2019 Placements, and COVID-19 Resilience Nathan audits team headcount and immediately pushes back when Anil classifies a graphic designer as an engineer, forcing Anil to concede they are UI designers rather than coders.15:09–17:38 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Proprietary Cleared Talent Database and Bootstrapped Growth When Nathan suggests freelance platforms can fill these engineering roles, Anil educates him on niche defense cybersecurity roles requiring clearance inside SCIFs and reveals their 400k candidate proprietary database.0:00–3:04 · Guest teaching 1/10 Show Hook and GetLatka Subscription Promotion After an introductory ad read, Nathan challenges Anil immediately on whether his business is real SaaS or consulting, and pushes back on industry jargon by insisting Anil say jobs instead of requisitions.3:04–5:37 · Guest teaching 3/10 Debating Fixed Monthly Fees versus Contingency Recruiting Models Nathan vigorously challenges Anil's claim that his subscription recruiting model puts skin in the game, pointing out that clients lose upfront monthly retainer fees if no hire is made, unlike traditional contingency recruiters.5:37–9:36 · Guest teaching 3/10 Democratizing Talent Acquisition and Human-Driven Sourcing Nathan cuts off Anil's statistics to insist that upfront monthly fees remain sunk costs regardless of subsequent discounts. Nathan also catches Anil flat-footed when asking him to name direct competitors in the RPO space.9:36–12:28 · Guest teaching 6/10 Revenue Breakdown Across RaaS and Government Staffing Clients Nathan drills down on the customer breakdown and questions why clients do not simply use Toptal. Anil schools Nathan on the structural requirements of government contracts requiring security clearances and US citizenship.12:30–15:08 · Guest teaching 2/10 Team Composition, 2019 Placements, and COVID-19 Resilience Nathan audits team headcount and immediately pushes back when Anil classifies a graphic designer as an engineer, forcing Anil to concede they are UI designers rather than coders.15:09–17:38 · Guest teaching 6/10 Proprietary Cleared Talent Database and Bootstrapped Growth When Nathan suggests freelance platforms can fill these engineering roles, Anil educates him on niche defense cybersecurity roles requiring clearance inside SCIFs and reveals their 400k candidate proprietary database.0:00–3:04 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Show Hook and GetLatka Subscription Promotion After an introductory ad read, Nathan challenges Anil immediately on whether his business is real SaaS or consulting, and pushes back on industry jargon by insisting Anil say jobs instead of requisitions.3:04–5:37 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Debating Fixed Monthly Fees versus Contingency Recruiting Models Nathan vigorously challenges Anil's claim that his subscription recruiting model puts skin in the game, pointing out that clients lose upfront monthly retainer fees if no hire is made, unlike traditional contingency recruiters.5:37–9:36 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Democratizing Talent Acquisition and Human-Driven Sourcing Nathan cuts off Anil's statistics to insist that upfront monthly fees remain sunk costs regardless of subsequent discounts. Nathan also catches Anil flat-footed when asking him to name direct competitors in the RPO space.9:36–12:28 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Revenue Breakdown Across RaaS and Government Staffing Clients Nathan drills down on the customer breakdown and questions why clients do not simply use Toptal. Anil schools Nathan on the structural requirements of government contracts requiring security clearances and US citizenship.12:30–15:08 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Team Composition, 2019 Placements, and COVID-19 Resilience Nathan audits team headcount and immediately pushes back when Anil classifies a graphic designer as an engineer, forcing Anil to concede they are UI designers rather than coders.15:09–17:38 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Proprietary Cleared Talent Database and Bootstrapped Growth When Nathan suggests freelance platforms can fill these engineering roles, Anil educates him on niche defense cybersecurity roles requiring clearance inside SCIFs and reveals their 400k candidate proprietary database.0:00–3:04 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Show Hook and GetLatka Subscription Promotion After an introductory ad read, Nathan challenges Anil immediately on whether his business is real SaaS or consulting, and pushes back on industry jargon by insisting Anil say jobs instead of requisitions.3:04–5:37 · Nathan pushing back 8/10 Debating Fixed Monthly Fees versus Contingency Recruiting Models Nathan vigorously challenges Anil's claim that his subscription recruiting model puts skin in the game, pointing out that clients lose upfront monthly retainer fees if no hire is made, unlike traditional contingency recruiters.5:37–9:36 · Nathan pushing back 8/10 Democratizing Talent Acquisition and Human-Driven Sourcing Nathan cuts off Anil's statistics to insist that upfront monthly fees remain sunk costs regardless of subsequent discounts. Nathan also catches Anil flat-footed when asking him to name direct competitors in the RPO space.9:36–12:28 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Revenue Breakdown Across RaaS and Government Staffing Clients Nathan drills down on the customer breakdown and questions why clients do not simply use Toptal. Anil schools Nathan on the structural requirements of government contracts requiring security clearances and US citizenship.12:30–15:08 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Team Composition, 2019 Placements, and COVID-19 Resilience Nathan audits team headcount and immediately pushes back when Anil classifies a graphic designer as an engineer, forcing Anil to concede they are UI designers rather than coders.15:09–17:38 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Proprietary Cleared Talent Database and Bootstrapped Growth When Nathan suggests freelance platforms can fill these engineering roles, Anil educates him on niche defense cybersecurity roles requiring clearance inside SCIFs and reveals their 400k candidate proprietary database.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 63.1% · guest 36.9%0:00 · Nathan 63.1% · guest 36.9%3:00 · Nathan 30.2% · guest 69.8%3:00 · Nathan 30.2% · guest 69.8%6:00 · Nathan 16.1% · guest 83.9%6:00 · Nathan 16.1% · guest 83.9%9:00 · Nathan 18.3% · guest 81.7%9:00 · Nathan 18.3% · guest 81.7%12:00 · Nathan 33.4% · guest 66.6%12:00 · Nathan 33.4% · guest 66.6%15:00 · Nathan 33.4% · guest 66.6%15:00 · Nathan 33.4% · guest 66.6%18:00 · Nathan 59.6% · guest 40.4%18:00 · Nathan 59.6% · guest 40.4%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 5:07 Anil defends fee structure against contingency recruiting

Anil forcefully rejects Nathan's framing that clients get burned on the monthly model, contrasting a three thousand dollar total fee against twenty thousand dollar contingency recruiter payouts.

Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 7:10 Nathan refuses sunk cost framing and demands competitor names

Nathan cuts off Anil's attempt to use industry statistics, reasserting that client retainers are pure sunk cost and putting Anil on the spot to name competitors.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 11:36 Anil breaks down government systems integrator restrictions

Anil educates Nathan on why platforms like Toptal cannot operate in this niche due to federal security clearance, public trust, and US citizenship mandates.

Nathan holds their own ▶ 4:50 Nathan dismantles skin in the game assertion

Nathan demonstrates sharp commercial acumen by catching the loophole in Anil's pricing guarantee, pointing out that discounting future months does not refund already lost capital.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Show Hook and GetLatka Subscription Promotion 4125 After an introductory ad read, Nathan challenges Anil immediately on whether his business is real SaaS or consulting, and pushes back on industry jargon by insisting Anil say jobs instead of requisitions.
Debating Fixed Monthly Fees versus Contingency Recruiting Models 6358 Nathan vigorously challenges Anil's claim that his subscription recruiting model puts skin in the game, pointing out that clients lose upfront monthly retainer fees if no hire is made, unlike traditional contingency recruiters.
Democratizing Talent Acquisition and Human-Driven Sourcing 7358 Nathan cuts off Anil's statistics to insist that upfront monthly fees remain sunk costs regardless of subsequent discounts. Nathan also catches Anil flat-footed when asking him to name direct competitors in the RPO space.
Revenue Breakdown Across RaaS and Government Staffing Clients 5646 Nathan drills down on the customer breakdown and questions why clients do not simply use Toptal. Anil schools Nathan on the structural requirements of government contracts requiring security clearances and US citizenship.
Team Composition, 2019 Placements, and COVID-19 Resilience 5225 Nathan audits team headcount and immediately pushes back when Anil classifies a graphic designer as an engineer, forcing Anil to concede they are UI designers rather than coders.
Proprietary Cleared Talent Database and Bootstrapped Growth 5645 When Nathan suggests freelance platforms can fill these engineering roles, Anil educates him on niche defense cybersecurity roles requiring clearance inside SCIFs and reveals their 400k candidate proprietary database.

Statements from this episode (12)

Disclosure
Param Solutions charges flat-fee RaaS tiers between $3,000 and $10,000 monthly
“So how we've structured it, Nathan, is essentially it's per requisition cost, right? So the client depends on how many requisitions they have. It's a flat fee. They just pay us a thousand bucks for each requisition. Okay. But we sort of tear it out into three …”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 2:10
Disclosure
Param Solutions charges $1,000 monthly per job requisition, guaranteeing three resumes
“If you give me 20 jobs, right, and I'm going to charge you a thousand dollars per job per month, again, and I'm going to promise you it's a SLA based requisition model, right? So typically what happens is, let's say you want to hire Five Oracle DBAs. Let's mak…”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 3:38
Disclosure
Param discounts monthly fees by 10% for each month roles remain unfilled
“Now let's say if you don't hire you know, if I show you three candidates, right, you end up not hiring even a single candidate, right? So we start taking a hit on, on the SLA, right? So we give you a discount from thousand dollars. We drop it down 10% every mo…”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 4:24
Disclosure
Param Solutions targets Washington D.C. companies hiring 5 to 15 people annually
“The sweet spot that we have right now in the DC market is companies that are, you know, typically hiring between anywhere from five folks to maybe 10 to 15 people, a full calendar year, right?”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 6:37
Disclosure
Param Solutions serves 11 total clients, with 6 using its RaaS platform
“Right now we have 11 clients. Okay. And six of them are actually on the RAS platform on the recruiting as a service platform.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 9:42
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Param's government contractor clients exclusively require cleared US citizens
“A lot of our clients are actually government systems integrators. Okay. That means we cannot have H one people. We can't have green card. We cannot have any of those labor categories. We only have to have us citizens. And citizens that are actually clear.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 11:50
Disclosure
Param Solutions breaks down its $37,000 monthly RaaS revenue across six customers
“So right now I have one customer is paying us three grand. I have six, four customers who are paying us six grand. One customer is paying us 10 grand.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 12:18
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Param Solutions employs 17 people across India and the United States
“Okay, so we have six sorry, we have 17 folks. 10 are in India and five are in the US. And two other consultants.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 12:39
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Param Solutions successfully placed candidates in 76 jobs during 2019
“In last year, we filled 76 jobs.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 13:53
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Param Solutions worked on over 140 job requisitions during 2019
“Well, actually, Nathan, believe it or not, we worked on probably about 140 plus requisitions just in twenty-nineteen.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 14:05
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Param Solutions holds a proprietary database of over 380,000 cleared candidates
“And we have grown our own proprietary database system over the past seven and a half, eight years. We have over 400,000 records in that system, right? Over 95% of the records that we have in our system actually have clearances, right?”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 16:33
Disclosure
Param Solutions is entirely bootstrapped with no outside capital raised
“No, it's completely self-funded by me and my business partner. We haven't gone to the capital markets. We haven't raised any funding at all.”
Anil Kasablada Aug 7, 2020 ▶ 17:29
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.