Mar 31, 2022 · 20m · top-founders
Raising $6m Now? Software Platform Helps 70 SaaS Companies Hire Sales Reps
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Aspireship founder and CEO Corey Kossack breaks down the unit economics, candidate sourcing funnels, and revenue trajectory of his software sales talent marketplace. He details how the platform trains non-traditional candidates, charges 9,000-dollar hiring fees to SaaS employers, and prepares for an upcoming Series A round.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 35.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Nathan as informed peer 4.9 Guest teaching 2.0 Guest disagreement 1.0 Nathan pushing back 2.0
speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 18:37 Corey rejects valuation optimization framing
Corey rejects Nathan's push for a target valuation range, asserting that prioritizing high valuation over partner quality causes severe founder scar tissue.
Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 6:24 Nathan challenges the growth bottleneckNathan refuses to accept passive growth claims, directly confronting Corey on why expansion isn't much faster given fast payback and high gross margins.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 13:54 Corey outlines sales compensation realityCorey provides concrete industry data on modern remote SDR and BDR salary bands, variables, and exceptions for strategic roles.
Nathan holds their own ▶ 5:30 Nathan reverse engineers unit economicsNathan synthesizes disjointed revenue and acquisition metrics live on air to calculate the platform's exact candidate conversion rate.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Nathan as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Nathan pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Economics, Payback Periods, and Marketplace Pricing Models | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Nathan takes Corey's stated numbers and performs real-time unit economics calculations, translating revenue per active user into a 32-to-1 candidate placement ratio. Corey confirms the math and elaborates on the subscription discount model. | |
| Scaling Candidate Volume and Viral Acquisition Channels | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Nathan presses on where the scaling bottleneck is if unit economics are so profitable. Corey clarifies that candidate supply was historical friction until unlocking niche organic channels like teacher transitioning courses. | |
| Revenue Scaling, Subscription Adoption, and Historical Placement Figures | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Nathan cross-checks Corey's $700k revenue against placement fees to estimate exact hiring volume. Corey explains how pricing changes and subscription tiers impacted the total placement figures. | |
| Pricing Elasticity, Monthly Run Rates, and Sales Compensation Benchmarks | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Nathan explores candidate market compensation dynamics and role types placed by the platform. Corey details specific market benchmarks for remote SDR base salaries and OTE packages. | |
| Capitalization History, Convertible Notes, and Executive Team Structure | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nathan dissects the round tranches from the initial $1.4M pre-seed to the recent $20M valuation cap note, estimating Corey's remaining equity ownership. | |
| Past M&A Track Record with Frederick and Upcoming Series A Target | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Nathan reviews Corey's multi-step exit track record from Frederick to MindBody to Vista. Corey pushes back against maximizing valuation on the next round, emphasizing investor alignment over top dollar. | |
| Founder Summary and Episode Conclusion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host closing monologue summarizing Aspireship's business model, fundraising history, and financial metrics. |
Statements from this episode (18)
Kossack: Aspireship has placed candidates with about 70 employers
“Yeah, I think we're up to about 70 now.”
Kossack: Talent marketplaces grow primarily through candidate network effects
“I'm actually more interested in the candidate side because it's a network driven business. So as more candidates come in they attract more candidates and then attract more companies.”
Kossack: Aspireship Generates $275 per Active User on a $20 CAC
“So it currently costs us about 20 bucks to get an active user, and within a 120 days at least over the last 12 months, we've averaged 275 dollars per active user.”
Kossack: Aspireship Operates at Around 80% Gross Margin
“It's actually like a 80% gross margin business.”
Kossack: Aspireship Charges Companies $9,000 per Hire
“Companies are paying 9000 dollars per hire to hire out of our kind of handpicked talent pool that we match with them.”
Kossack: Aspireship Monetizes Roughly 3% of Active Users Through Hires
“So from the top of active users, like three percent, at least at the current state of the marketplace is about what it looks like. There's a three percent get hired. Through our network where we actually monetize.”
Kossack: Aspireship did $120k revenue in 2020, mostly in Q4
“Like one, 20. Yeah. Yeah, for sure. And almost all of that was in Q four.”
Kossack: Aspireship will generate $2M to $3M in 2022 revenue
“It'll be in the twos. So two to three, you know, three would be three would be upside.”
Kossack: Only about 15% of Aspireship clients use subscription pricing
“So it's maybe like 15% of the base. So the majority, even ones that do repeat hiring, they just like a la carte. They like to pay when they hire”
Kossack: Aspireship placed ~100 candidates directly in 2021
“I think probably about a hundred. Directly through the network. So figure that there's two to three X that amount outside the network that are landing jobs in tech.”
Kossack: Aspireship changed pricing three times in 12 months
“Not to mention that we've changed pricing at least three times in the last 12 months. We used to charge five K per hire.”
Kossack: SaaS buyers are binary on paying rather than price sensitive
“It's basically, I think most SAS companies and people that look at this, they're either willing to pay something or they're willing to pay nothing. It's less about, ooh, that's too expensive. That's too pricey.”
Kossack: Remote SaaS SDR comp typically sits between $60K and $80K
“50 to 65 K on a base and, you know, 10 to 20 K in a variable. So you're looking at, you know, 60 to 80 is, you know, all in is, is typically what you're gonna see.”
Kossack: Aspireship has raised $4 million to date
“And then I basically taken inside money since then we've raised a total of four million. To date.”