AI Policy
topic on 4 shows · 7 statements across 6 episodes
Masters of Scale 
WTF is with Nikhil Kamath 
the a16z Podcast 
All-In
7 statements about AI Policy, every show
Chi: AI policy discussions have been too abstract to define regulation
“I think the main issue though is that policy conversations as they've happened over the last couple of years have been very abstract. And there, there's been no material grounding to figure out what policy should cover.”
Perault: Regulate AI applications and use, not underlying model development
“Regulate use. Do not regulate development.”
McCune: U.S. AI policy prioritizing growth over safetyism will remain for years
“That dynamic and that shift of rhetoric is incredibly important because what that does is it signals to the rest of the world. It signals to other governments that this is the position of the United States and will be the position for the next three and a half…”
Bonatsos: Policy Cannot Keep Up with AI's Rapid Development Pace
“Policy cannot catch up. Like the hardest thing, honestly, that we face right now is even if you're like a PhD in AI working for one of the foundation model companies, you can't keep up with the pace.”
Sacks: Space-race model will dominate AI policy frame for years
“I think this idea of an AI race that is similar to the space race, I think is going to be the dominant frame on AI policy for years to come.”
Horowitz: Gina Raimondo and Jake Sullivan are fantastic on AI policy
“By the way, Gina Raimondo has been absolutely fantastic on her thinking on AI policy, how it relates to China and CFIUS and so forth, you know, as has Jake Sullivan, the National Security Advisor.”