Rike: Early Seat-Based SaaS Companies Typically See 104% to 110% NRR
Ray Rike · Top 5 SaaS Performance & Revenue Efficiency Metrics that Matter in 2023 · Jun 19, 2023 · at 16:18
This episode carries Ray Rike's own address, with nobody on the show putting questions to them. It still counts as said, and it is kept out of every score on their page.
RevOps Squared founder Ray Rike explains why seat-based subscription SaaS companies should not expect the 150%+ NRR benchmarks set by usage-based enterprise platforms.
0:00 / 0:09exact quote · 9.2s
720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“If you are a true annual subscription, seat-based or whatever other, you are going to be more in that 104 to 110%, especially early on.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Ray Rike
Rule of 40 is now the metric most correlated with SaaS valuation
“But it's now the number one SAS metric as correlated to enterprise value in the next 12 months revenue. A year ago, it was number five. Growth is still number two. But balanced growth with profitability is number one.”
CAC ratio is superior to the SaaS Magic Number
“CAC ratio to me is superior to the rule of 40. Why? I'm sorry. The SAS magic number. Why? Because you can measure how much sales and marketing investment you need to make for one dollar of new name ARR, and How much sales and marketing, customer success invest…”
CLTV to CAC ratio is meaningless for $1M ARR SaaS startups
“If someone says, I'm concerned about your CLTV to CAC ratio at a million dollars, you need to wonder why you're working with that person, because it's pretty meaningless”
SaaS customer acquisition efficiency typically drops at $7M to $15M ARR
“When you hit kind of 10 to fifteen million, it gets more difficult to acquire new customers. Why? You've hit the cream of the crop. Now you might be getting those early majority buyers. If you look at the crossing the chasm technology life cycle adoption curve…”