The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Matt Taibbi no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q So having ripped the umpire jersey off their backs to basically stop the Trump menace, it seems like journalism can't now go back to even a pretense of neutrality. Is that what basically has happened now?

A I think so. I think, and I think you see that in, in what happened, what's happening with the ratings at, at cable stations. Um, you know, I, I warned about this in 2016. I, I, I wrote a column in the, in that summer saying that a model where basically right-wing media wrote about the evils of the Democratic Party and blue media wrote about the evils of the Republican Party. Um, that, that just wouldn't work audience-wise because audiences would no longer trust either, uh, source to be objective and to report the facts, and I think that's where we are now. Like, we, we see the declining, um, the declining ratings of, of companies like CNN and MSNBC, uh, which were previously thought of as more kind of down the road, down the middle of the road news agencies, And now are thought of as politicized, and they're having a terrible trouble kind of going back, because once you cross that line into politics, um, you can't get your reputation back as a neutral fact finder anymore.

AI assessment note: “once you cross that line into politics, um, you can't get your reputation back”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.