The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jeremy Allaire no published score: only 2 usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
2on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q art. Is, uh, I think the old expression. So let's, let's talk about your journey with Circle. Uh, stablecoins obviously are top of mind because we had the Genius Act. Uh, my bestie, uh, David Sachs, who's our crypto and AI czar for America, who's here with me at Davos, uh, or I should say I'm here with him. Uh, he invited me to come. This technology is important. Why?

A I mean, look, um, when I got started working on this almost 13 years ago, Um, Bitcoin had emerged, um, and, uh, it was from my perspective as an internet technologist, I was thinking about, wow, this seems like a new infrastructure layer for the internet, like a missing infrastructure layer of the internet. The internet had ways to represent in, you know, data, media, audio, video, uh, you know, software, but there was no notion of money on the internet, and there was no protocol for money on the internet. And it was very clear at the time that that was going to happen. And when, when we started, um, I wasn't convinced that everyone in the world is just going to use like a new, uh, a new, you know, commodity money like Bitcoin. Um, my view is that we needed a bridge. We needed to connect kind of the existing fiat system to crypto and to these new networks and, um, and build like, uh, uh, what we called like an HTTP for dollars on the internet. And that was the idea. And eventually that's called stablecoins. Early on, we talked about we're building fiat digital currency or fiat tokens or all this, but stablecoins stuck. Um, but I mean, the basic idea is we now have a general purpose, general architecture form of money on the internet, digital dollars that can move just like everything else, but that, and, and can, you know, transact peer to peer Uh, which is super, super powerfu…

AI assessment note: “we now have a general purpose, general architecture form of money on the internet”

Answered raw tape D 5 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.90

Q And as we've seen, uh, there's things that are legal, and then there are incumbents. Incumbents will, uh, use the legal system to try to stop innovators. You've also faced a little bit of that, yeah?

A Yeah, I mean, I, I would say in the entire history of, of building this, it's been just, there's been huge uphill battles with, with regulators and incumbents, and what's interesting is that, um, I found over the years that, um, if you, if you come into a policymaker or a regulator and you say, hey, there's this, there's a new technology. It can improve things in this way. Um, we're trying to figure out how to deal with the risks. There are real risks. Like, let's not pretend there aren't risks. And like, let's come up with ways to address that. Like, actually people are pretty interested in talking. Um, and so I think there's, there's, um, you know, that's there. Um, But generally, when you go to, like, the incumbents and say, hey, we want to, like, work with you or integrate this because we kind of need to work with you to make the whole thing happen, like, a lot more skepticism and, and I think kind of constraint there. And so that's changed now. I mean, we're in a very different world now.

AI assessment note: “there's been huge uphill battles with, with regulators and incumbents”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.