The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jenny Just no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.90

Q partner in the venture firm, and that kind of nonsense, but, I'm curious why it hasn't happened in finance as quickly as maybe some other pursuits. Um, and then second question, um, when you do get women at the poker table and it does click, what do you see change in them in terms of, you know, how they look at the world? You can take that in either order.

A Yeah, I mean, it's, I, I, it's fascinating, I have to say. So, um, why isn't it happen sooner? I'll do that one. So what I've learned, of course, being, um, a female and a male dominated world for my whole career, I also grew up with four brothers. So, um, it's no surprise maybe that I'm there, but also, Like, begging to figure out how to solve the problem. Um, I will tell you it squarely comes down to risk taking. So, it's, um, and what we don't realize, so in, in our natural play and hobbies, uh, typical, you know, the stereotype, how, how a young girl plays, I'm not taking risk. And one of the things that we have found, and what I see actually helps women at the poker table, it's, cause every hand is a risk of some sort. They don't get enough repetition of risk. So we don't talk about taking larger risks. We actually talk about taking, not taking more risk. Sorry, let me step back. More risk. We talk about taking more risks with an S. Yeah. So we need to get reps in, and those reps aren't part of our upbringing.

AI assessment note: “it squarely comes down to risk taking.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.