Dec 22, 2025 · 56m · allin

Scott Bessent: Fixing the Fed, Tariffs for National Security, Solving Affordability in 2026

Scott Bessent · 40m spoken Jason Calacanis · 4m spoken David Sacks · 3m spoken Chamath Palihapitiya · 3m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this All-In Podcast interview, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent details the Trump administration's economic policy framework, highlighting deficit reduction goals, strategic tariff enforcement, Federal Reserve reforms, and tax relief aimed at restoring Main Street affordability.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The hosts hold 21.6% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 3.7 Guest teaching 4.8 Guest disagreement 2.0 The hosts pushing back 3.2
05100:0015:0030:0045:000:55–3:13 · The hosts as informed peer 1/10 Budget Deficit Targets and Fiscal Expectations for 2026 Sacks opens with a collaborative question on deficit targets without pressing the guest. Bessent walks through fiscal figures, highlighting a modest fiscal contraction down to $1.78 trillion and projecting future deficit targets below 3% of GDP.3:13–7:17 · The hosts as informed peer 2/10 Evaluating Tariff Efficacy and Shifting Economic Doctrines Chamath asks why economic consensus missed the success of tariffs, prompting Bessent to cite an anti-Trump bias and an old San Francisco Fed study on disinflation. Sacks follows up with a standard policy question about balancing tax cuts against deficit reduction.7:17–11:15 · The hosts as informed peer 3/10 Tariffs as National Security Leverage and Trade Rebalancing Bessent explains how tariffs act as national security leverage against China and North American partners. Chamath questions whether tariff revenues can be reliably forecasted through 2028, allowing Bessent to clarify how tariff income transitions into domestic tax revenue.11:15–15:20 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Supreme Court Tariff Challenges and Executive Authority Calacanis challenges executive tariff authority by pointing to Congress's constitutional mandate, prompting Bessent to directly question his premise. Bessent then educates the hosts on Supreme Court oral arguments and statutory trade levers like IEPA, Section 301, and 232.15:20–21:49 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Main Street Approval, Affordability, and Inflation Dynamics Calacanis confronts Bessent with negative polling numbers on Main Street inflation and the economy, asking if voters were gaslit or if Trump overpromised. Calacanis further presses on whether Wall Street can trust BLS numbers that used zero-fill placeholders during the government shutdown.21:49–33:00 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Federal Reserve Overreach, QE, and Monetary Policy Impact Chamath references Bessent's essay on the Fed's monetary policy and asks for historical context. Bessent delivers an extensive breakdown of Federal Reserve history since 1913, post-GFC overregulation, and how QE acted as an engine of wealth inequality.33:00–45:38 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Federal Reserve Reform, Chair Candidates, and Credit Availability Calacanis asks informed questions regarding the origins of the 2% inflation target, Fed asset purchasing criteria, and practical housing supply constraints on Main Street. Bessent details emergency facility powers and outlines candidate plans to shrink the Fed's footprint.45:38–49:56 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 State Capitalism vs. Strategic National Security Investments Sacks challenges the administration taking equity stakes in private companies, questioning whether state capitalism fits conservative free-market principles. Bessent justifies the intervention as necessary national security defense in critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.49:56–56:46 · The hosts as informed peer 1/10 2026 Economic Outlook, Tax Relief, and 'Trump Accounts' Chamath asks supportive questions about upcoming tax relief and 'Trump Accounts'. Bessent enthusiastically outlines CapEx incentives, working-class tax deductions, and the universal equity ownership vision without host resistance.0:55–3:13 · Guest teaching 3/10 Budget Deficit Targets and Fiscal Expectations for 2026 Sacks opens with a collaborative question on deficit targets without pressing the guest. Bessent walks through fiscal figures, highlighting a modest fiscal contraction down to $1.78 trillion and projecting future deficit targets below 3% of GDP.3:13–7:17 · Guest teaching 5/10 Evaluating Tariff Efficacy and Shifting Economic Doctrines Chamath asks why economic consensus missed the success of tariffs, prompting Bessent to cite an anti-Trump bias and an old San Francisco Fed study on disinflation. Sacks follows up with a standard policy question about balancing tax cuts against deficit reduction.7:17–11:15 · Guest teaching 5/10 Tariffs as National Security Leverage and Trade Rebalancing Bessent explains how tariffs act as national security leverage against China and North American partners. Chamath questions whether tariff revenues can be reliably forecasted through 2028, allowing Bessent to clarify how tariff income transitions into domestic tax revenue.11:15–15:20 · Guest teaching 7/10 Supreme Court Tariff Challenges and Executive Authority Calacanis challenges executive tariff authority by pointing to Congress's constitutional mandate, prompting Bessent to directly question his premise. Bessent then educates the hosts on Supreme Court oral arguments and statutory trade levers like IEPA, Section 301, and 232.15:20–21:49 · Guest teaching 5/10 Main Street Approval, Affordability, and Inflation Dynamics Calacanis confronts Bessent with negative polling numbers on Main Street inflation and the economy, asking if voters were gaslit or if Trump overpromised. Calacanis further presses on whether Wall Street can trust BLS numbers that used zero-fill placeholders during the government shutdown.21:49–33:00 · Guest teaching 6/10 Federal Reserve Overreach, QE, and Monetary Policy Impact Chamath references Bessent's essay on the Fed's monetary policy and asks for historical context. Bessent delivers an extensive breakdown of Federal Reserve history since 1913, post-GFC overregulation, and how QE acted as an engine of wealth inequality.33:00–45:38 · Guest teaching 5/10 Federal Reserve Reform, Chair Candidates, and Credit Availability Calacanis asks informed questions regarding the origins of the 2% inflation target, Fed asset purchasing criteria, and practical housing supply constraints on Main Street. Bessent details emergency facility powers and outlines candidate plans to shrink the Fed's footprint.45:38–49:56 · Guest teaching 5/10 State Capitalism vs. Strategic National Security Investments Sacks challenges the administration taking equity stakes in private companies, questioning whether state capitalism fits conservative free-market principles. Bessent justifies the intervention as necessary national security defense in critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.49:56–56:46 · Guest teaching 2/10 2026 Economic Outlook, Tax Relief, and 'Trump Accounts' Chamath asks supportive questions about upcoming tax relief and 'Trump Accounts'. Bessent enthusiastically outlines CapEx incentives, working-class tax deductions, and the universal equity ownership vision without host resistance.0:55–3:13 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Budget Deficit Targets and Fiscal Expectations for 2026 Sacks opens with a collaborative question on deficit targets without pressing the guest. Bessent walks through fiscal figures, highlighting a modest fiscal contraction down to $1.78 trillion and projecting future deficit targets below 3% of GDP.3:13–7:17 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Evaluating Tariff Efficacy and Shifting Economic Doctrines Chamath asks why economic consensus missed the success of tariffs, prompting Bessent to cite an anti-Trump bias and an old San Francisco Fed study on disinflation. Sacks follows up with a standard policy question about balancing tax cuts against deficit reduction.7:17–11:15 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Tariffs as National Security Leverage and Trade Rebalancing Bessent explains how tariffs act as national security leverage against China and North American partners. Chamath questions whether tariff revenues can be reliably forecasted through 2028, allowing Bessent to clarify how tariff income transitions into domestic tax revenue.11:15–15:20 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Supreme Court Tariff Challenges and Executive Authority Calacanis challenges executive tariff authority by pointing to Congress's constitutional mandate, prompting Bessent to directly question his premise. Bessent then educates the hosts on Supreme Court oral arguments and statutory trade levers like IEPA, Section 301, and 232.15:20–21:49 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Main Street Approval, Affordability, and Inflation Dynamics Calacanis confronts Bessent with negative polling numbers on Main Street inflation and the economy, asking if voters were gaslit or if Trump overpromised. Calacanis further presses on whether Wall Street can trust BLS numbers that used zero-fill placeholders during the government shutdown.21:49–33:00 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Federal Reserve Overreach, QE, and Monetary Policy Impact Chamath references Bessent's essay on the Fed's monetary policy and asks for historical context. Bessent delivers an extensive breakdown of Federal Reserve history since 1913, post-GFC overregulation, and how QE acted as an engine of wealth inequality.33:00–45:38 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Federal Reserve Reform, Chair Candidates, and Credit Availability Calacanis asks informed questions regarding the origins of the 2% inflation target, Fed asset purchasing criteria, and practical housing supply constraints on Main Street. Bessent details emergency facility powers and outlines candidate plans to shrink the Fed's footprint.45:38–49:56 · Guest disagreement 2/10 State Capitalism vs. Strategic National Security Investments Sacks challenges the administration taking equity stakes in private companies, questioning whether state capitalism fits conservative free-market principles. Bessent justifies the intervention as necessary national security defense in critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.49:56–56:46 · Guest disagreement 0/10 2026 Economic Outlook, Tax Relief, and 'Trump Accounts' Chamath asks supportive questions about upcoming tax relief and 'Trump Accounts'. Bessent enthusiastically outlines CapEx incentives, working-class tax deductions, and the universal equity ownership vision without host resistance.0:55–3:13 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Budget Deficit Targets and Fiscal Expectations for 2026 Sacks opens with a collaborative question on deficit targets without pressing the guest. Bessent walks through fiscal figures, highlighting a modest fiscal contraction down to $1.78 trillion and projecting future deficit targets below 3% of GDP.3:13–7:17 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Evaluating Tariff Efficacy and Shifting Economic Doctrines Chamath asks why economic consensus missed the success of tariffs, prompting Bessent to cite an anti-Trump bias and an old San Francisco Fed study on disinflation. Sacks follows up with a standard policy question about balancing tax cuts against deficit reduction.7:17–11:15 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Tariffs as National Security Leverage and Trade Rebalancing Bessent explains how tariffs act as national security leverage against China and North American partners. Chamath questions whether tariff revenues can be reliably forecasted through 2028, allowing Bessent to clarify how tariff income transitions into domestic tax revenue.11:15–15:20 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Supreme Court Tariff Challenges and Executive Authority Calacanis challenges executive tariff authority by pointing to Congress's constitutional mandate, prompting Bessent to directly question his premise. Bessent then educates the hosts on Supreme Court oral arguments and statutory trade levers like IEPA, Section 301, and 232.15:20–21:49 · The hosts pushing back 7/10 Main Street Approval, Affordability, and Inflation Dynamics Calacanis confronts Bessent with negative polling numbers on Main Street inflation and the economy, asking if voters were gaslit or if Trump overpromised. Calacanis further presses on whether Wall Street can trust BLS numbers that used zero-fill placeholders during the government shutdown.21:49–33:00 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Federal Reserve Overreach, QE, and Monetary Policy Impact Chamath references Bessent's essay on the Fed's monetary policy and asks for historical context. Bessent delivers an extensive breakdown of Federal Reserve history since 1913, post-GFC overregulation, and how QE acted as an engine of wealth inequality.33:00–45:38 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Federal Reserve Reform, Chair Candidates, and Credit Availability Calacanis asks informed questions regarding the origins of the 2% inflation target, Fed asset purchasing criteria, and practical housing supply constraints on Main Street. Bessent details emergency facility powers and outlines candidate plans to shrink the Fed's footprint.45:38–49:56 · The hosts pushing back 5/10 State Capitalism vs. Strategic National Security Investments Sacks challenges the administration taking equity stakes in private companies, questioning whether state capitalism fits conservative free-market principles. Bessent justifies the intervention as necessary national security defense in critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.49:56–56:46 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 2026 Economic Outlook, Tax Relief, and 'Trump Accounts' Chamath asks supportive questions about upcoming tax relief and 'Trump Accounts'. Bessent enthusiastically outlines CapEx incentives, working-class tax deductions, and the universal equity ownership vision without host resistance.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 30.6% · guest 69.4%0:00 · the hosts 30.6% · guest 69.4%3:00 · the hosts 13.7% · guest 86.3%3:00 · the hosts 13.7% · guest 86.3%6:00 · the hosts 21.8% · guest 78.2%6:00 · the hosts 21.8% · guest 78.2%9:00 · the hosts 22.2% · guest 77.8%9:00 · the hosts 22.2% · guest 77.8%12:00 · the hosts 9.3% · guest 90.7%12:00 · the hosts 9.3% · guest 90.7%15:00 · the hosts 32.1% · guest 67.9%15:00 · the hosts 32.1% · guest 67.9%18:00 · the hosts 25.4% · guest 74.6%18:00 · the hosts 25.4% · guest 74.6%21:00 · the hosts 46.6% · guest 53.4%21:00 · the hosts 46.6% · guest 53.4%24:00 · the hosts 0.7% · guest 99.3%24:00 · the hosts 0.7% · guest 99.3%27:00 · the hosts 14% · guest 86%27:00 · the hosts 14% · guest 86%30:00 · the hosts 24.9% · guest 75.1%30:00 · the hosts 24.9% · guest 75.1%33:00 · the hosts 46.2% · guest 53.8%33:00 · the hosts 46.2% · guest 53.8%36:00 · the hosts 12.1% · guest 87.9%36:00 · the hosts 12.1% · guest 87.9%39:00 · the hosts 10.9% · guest 89.1%39:00 · the hosts 10.9% · guest 89.1%42:00 · the hosts 30% · guest 70%42:00 · the hosts 30% · guest 70%45:00 · the hosts 33.3% · guest 66.7%45:00 · the hosts 33.3% · guest 66.7%48:00 · the hosts 24% · guest 76%48:00 · the hosts 24% · guest 76%51:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%51:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%54:00 · the hosts 12.3% · guest 87.7%54:00 · the hosts 12.3% · guest 87.7%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 12:01 Bessent rejects Calacanis's constitutional premise

When Calacanis asserts that Congress holds tariff authority under the Constitution, Bessent forcefully interrupts with 'Why would you say Congress would have what authority?', directly challenging the host's framing.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 15:20 Calacanis presents negative Main Street economic metrics

Calacanis explicitly challenges the administration's economic record by citing a 30% drop in net approval on inflation and an 18% net negative on the economy, directly asking if the administration gaslit voters.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 12:15 Bessent breaks down Supreme Court proceedings and tariff statutes

Bessent leverages his personal attendance at the Supreme Court oral arguments to educate hosts on statutory frameworks like IEPA, 301, and 232, pointing out media misunderstanding of Justice Barrett's line of questioning.

The host holds their own ▶ 19:23 Calacanis presses on shutdown BLS data imputation

Calacanis demonstrates specific technical knowledge of BLS non-survey data collection during government shutdowns, asking pointedly whether Wall Street can trust numbers filled with assumed zero values.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Budget Deficit Targets and Fiscal Expectations for 2026 1310 Sacks opens with a collaborative question on deficit targets without pressing the guest. Bessent walks through fiscal figures, highlighting a modest fiscal contraction down to $1.78 trillion and projecting future deficit targets below 3% of GDP.
Evaluating Tariff Efficacy and Shifting Economic Doctrines 2522 Chamath asks why economic consensus missed the success of tariffs, prompting Bessent to cite an anti-Trump bias and an old San Francisco Fed study on disinflation. Sacks follows up with a standard policy question about balancing tax cuts against deficit reduction.
Tariffs as National Security Leverage and Trade Rebalancing 3512 Bessent explains how tariffs act as national security leverage against China and North American partners. Chamath questions whether tariff revenues can be reliably forecasted through 2028, allowing Bessent to clarify how tariff income transitions into domestic tax revenue.
Supreme Court Tariff Challenges and Executive Authority 5756 Calacanis challenges executive tariff authority by pointing to Congress's constitutional mandate, prompting Bessent to directly question his premise. Bessent then educates the hosts on Supreme Court oral arguments and statutory trade levers like IEPA, Section 301, and 232.
Main Street Approval, Affordability, and Inflation Dynamics 6547 Calacanis confronts Bessent with negative polling numbers on Main Street inflation and the economy, asking if voters were gaslit or if Trump overpromised. Calacanis further presses on whether Wall Street can trust BLS numbers that used zero-fill placeholders during the government shutdown.
Federal Reserve Overreach, QE, and Monetary Policy Impact 5623 Chamath references Bessent's essay on the Fed's monetary policy and asks for historical context. Bessent delivers an extensive breakdown of Federal Reserve history since 1913, post-GFC overregulation, and how QE acted as an engine of wealth inequality.
Federal Reserve Reform, Chair Candidates, and Credit Availability 5514 Calacanis asks informed questions regarding the origins of the 2% inflation target, Fed asset purchasing criteria, and practical housing supply constraints on Main Street. Bessent details emergency facility powers and outlines candidate plans to shrink the Fed's footprint.
State Capitalism vs. Strategic National Security Investments 5525 Sacks challenges the administration taking equity stakes in private companies, questioning whether state capitalism fits conservative free-market principles. Bessent justifies the intervention as necessary national security defense in critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
2026 Economic Outlook, Tax Relief, and 'Trump Accounts' 1200 Chamath asks supportive questions about upcoming tax relief and 'Trump Accounts'. Bessent enthusiastically outlines CapEx incentives, working-class tax deductions, and the universal equity ownership vision without host resistance.

Statements from this episode (24)

Assertion Contradicted
Bessent claims 40% of 2024 federal spending happened in Q4
“So last year, 20, 24, 40% of the government spending occurred in the fourth quarter as they had the unsuccessful Or their unsuccessful attempt to convince voters that they weren't in a world of hurt.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 2:02
Prediction Partly held up
Bessent forecasts $200B to $300B U.S. fiscal contraction for the calendar year
“I forecast that we will have approximately a 200 to three hundred billion fiscal contraction for the calendar year, which is between .71% of GDP.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 2:22
Prediction Partly held up
Bessent projects U.S. deficit-to-GDP ratio will drop to mid-5% range
“We're gonna end the year with a nominal growth close to six percent. So we will be bringing down the Deficit to GDP. I believe it peaked 6.8% for the calendar year, previous year, and we're going to be in the mid fives”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 2:35
Prediction Open · timeframe Jan 2029
Bessent aims to reduce U.S. deficit-to-GDP ratio to 3% by 2028
“And I've said that I would, by the time President Trump leaves office, that we would like to have something with a three in front of it, which will stabilize the deficit to GDP, which is an important number, and enable us to start paying down debt.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 2:45
Assertion Supported
Bessent claims a 150-year San Francisco Fed study shows tariffs are disinflationary
“There's a study from not a friend of the administration, the San Francisco fed with a 150 years of data. I would refer everyone to that. That shows that tariffs do not cause inflation, that they're actually disinflationary.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 6:20
What-if
Bessent says China's rare earth export policy threatened Western trade
“Same thing on October eighth when Beijing announced that they were going to put a worldwide export license on any product that had .1% of Chinese rare earths in it, which would have ground the Western trading system to a halt.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 8:22
Insight
Bessent notes China maintains production despite tariffs to prioritize jobs
“The Chinese business model It's based on volume, it's based on employment, it's based on a five-year plan, and I think everyone neglected the idea that despite the tar, the tariffs, the Chinese were going to keep producing, that it's one of these, they may los…”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 8:51
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bessent predicts U.S. tariff revenue will fall as domestic manufacturing reshores
“So what should happen is over time, tariff income will come down and U.S. Tax receipts will come up, whether it's from factory jobs or more manufacturing, And through higher payroll taxes.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 10:06
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Bessent asserts the executive branch has absolute authority to raise trade revenues
“The president has absolute ability or the executive branch has absolute ability through three of ones, two 32 and something called one 22 to raise revenue on trade.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 15:01
Assertion Supported
Bessent states cumulative inflation reached 21% to 22% under the Biden administration
“I think cumulative CPI during the Biden administration was 21, 22%.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 17:30
Prediction Partly held up
Bessent predicts declining rental prices will continue to drop
“We are now seeing rents are down about five percent. I think that trend will continue.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 19:00
Assertion Partly supported
Bessent states real incomes are up 1.8% under Trump administration
“Real incomes are about, up about 1.8% since President Trump took office, and that's back to the Main Street question.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 19:10
Opinion
Bessent describes Bureau of Labor Statistics economic data as problematic
“Look, the BLS is problematic. We've seen that the whole time.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 21:25
Opinion
Bessent claims prolonged Federal Reserve quantitative easing drove economic inequality
“And the fed constant probably kept or definitely kept QE going for too long. And, you know, I called the fed the engine of inequality. And someone said to me, would you believe that the fed is responsible for economic equality in the system. And I said, absolu…”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 27:29
Assertion Partly supported
Bessent claims the Federal Reserve is currently losing $100 billion annually
“And no one told the Fed that you're not supposed to buy high, so. They paid a high, high price for bonds, low interest rates, and their arbitrage, the Fed's losing about a hundred billion dollars a year now.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 30:13
Assertion Supported
Bessent cites MIT study blaming budget deficits for 42% of recent inflation
“And there, there's a very good study from MIT that's come out that shows, you know, in a way that only PhDs at MIT can be very precise. 42% of the great inflation was caused by the budget deficit. Another 17% was caused by the increase in inflation expectation…”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 31:33
Insight
Bessent: Financial markets act like biology, not precise math or physics
“The economy, the markets are biology. They're not math. They're not physics. They're nonlinearities. They're very complex systems. They're mutations in the system. And this idea that we can have this decimal point certainty is just absurd.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 39:13
Assertion Supported
Bessent: Half of U.S. community banks vanished since 2008 crisis
“About half of them have disappeared since the GFC.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 44:09
Disclosure
Bessent reveals U.S. government is taking equity stakes in strategic industries
“If you look at the industries where we are taking stakes and moving forward, we've identified five to eight strategic industries where the U S we have to have endogenous production, or at least adjacent to us in North America or this hemisphere.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 48:09
Assertion Supported
Bessent notes 80% to 90% of U.S. pharmaceutical precursors originate overseas
“80, 90% of the precursor chemicals that go into U.S. Pharmaceuticals are made overseas. Majority in China or India.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 48:52
Opinion
Bessent calls Taiwan's 97% advanced chip concentration the top economic threat
“I believe that the greatest economic threat to the world economy, to the US economy, more than the Arab oil embargo that I lived through in the seventies when I was lined up with my parents to the, at the pump to do odd even days because of the oil embargo, th…”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 49:08
Prediction Held up
Bessent predicts U.S. households will receive $1,000 to $2,000 Q1 tax refunds
“And I can see that we're going to have a gigantic refund year in the first quarter because no one chains their working Americans did not change their withholding. So I think households could see depending on the number of workers, 1002 thousand dollar refunds,…”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 52:21
Assertion Supported
Bessent: 38% of Americans do not own equities directly or indirectly
“Right now, about 38% of Americans Do not own equities, either directly or through some kind of a four or one K or something.”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 53:32
Assertion Supported
Bessent claims Susan and Michael Dell are contributing $6.25B to Trump accounts
“Philanthropists like Susan and Michael Dell, We're going to put in 6.25 billion dollars to top up the accounts”
Scott Bessent Dec 22, 2025 ▶ 55:41
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.