Burn Multiple
topic on 4 shows · 14 statements across 9 episodes
Innovators & Investors
Lenny's Podcast
the Official SaaStr Podcast
All-In
14 statements about Burn Multiple, every show
Jake Soffer: Early-stage CAC and burn metrics matter less than painkiller validation
“I love like the pretty dashboards of looking at CAC and CAC payback and burn multiple and all that stuff. But this early on, not saying that stuff isn't valuable, but it doesn't matter. All that matters is, are you solving a need Are you a painkiller or a vita…”
Norton: Owner.com has operated at a sub-1.0 burn multiple
“We've reduced calc pretty significantly and we've operated with a one or a sub one burn multiple.”
Jackson: Early-stage startups should ignore burn multiple, gross margin, and NRR
“And then there are metrics to track efficiency, right? Things like burn multiple, gross margin, NRR, all of these things. They're all of them are just like not applicable at this stage. It's too early and you shouldn't be worrying about that stuff.”
Jackson: Strong PMF requires >60% gross margin, <10% churn, and >110% NRR
“So like, you know, we're talking about our gross margin needs to be above 60%, hopefully above 70%. Our burn multiple is now below three, right? Like ideally we're in like the, ideally we're like close to one, right? Burn multiple, like in the one to three zon…”
David Sacks: CAC Payback and Magic Number are flawed and easily miscalculated
“What I was seeing in metrics like CAC, is that if the finance team simply misattributed a certain expense, then, like, it would make the CAC Payback look great... Magic number is even the worst version of this. Like, no one knows how to calculate. It was const…”
David Sacks: Burn Multiple should trend from 2.0 to zero at IPO
“Your burn multiple, which is just your burn divided by your net new ARR, it should be going down. And obviously, by the time... That's the point, it should be going down, and so, like, if you're a late stage company, you're like a growth stage company, like, y…”
David Sacks: Startups must cap their Burn Multiple at 2.0 during downturns
“Do not let your burn multiple go above two, because We're going into a tough period. It's more likely that you're gonna miss than exceed, and if you miss, your burn multiple's gonna, like, go off the charts. It's gonna be even worse than you're planning, right…”
Sacks advises founders to keep 2023 burn multiples strictly below two
“I warn founders going into this year do not have a burn multiple greater than two because there's just so many headwinds right now that what happens is if you end up missing your revenue forecast, your burn multiple is going to look terrible. It could shoot up…”
Shen: Startups Over $5M–$10M ARR Should Prioritize CAC Payback Over Burn Multiples
“My big recommendation is for later stage companies, particularly if you're five, if not ten million AR and higher, to definitely start measuring your business by a CAC payback, because it's a true measure of new revenue that you're generating from your sales a…”
A SaaS burn multiple under 1.5 is good for sub-$25M ARR
“As a rule of thumb, for earlier stage companies below twenty-five million ARR it's probably not, not fair to still call them earlier, like, let's say early and mid-stage company at less than twenty-five million ARR one to 1.5 is generally considered to be good…”
The median a16z portfolio burn multiple for $0-10M ARR is 1.6
“Here this data set comes from Andreessen Horowitz, and you can see the typical numbers that they can see here in their portfolio for different revenue bands, and as you can see, the median for them in the zero to ten million ARR range is 1.6”
Capital-efficient founders retain double the equity scaling to $100M ARR
“If there are two companies growing from zero to about a hundred million in ARR, one of them has a burn multiple of four. The other one has a burn multiple initially starting at about three and then decreasing to about .75. Then just because you have to raise s…”
Janz: Good burn multiple for $1M-$25M ARR SaaS is 1.5 to 2
“As a general rule of thumb, for SaaS companies, around a million to twenty-five million in an ARR, which I'm assuming is probably the like, the range most people in the audience here are in one to five 1.5 to two is, is good. One to 1.5 or even lower is, is gr…”
Sacks: A startup burn multiple above 3 is bad
“If you can spend a dollar or less to generate an Incremental dollar of ARR. You're doing amazing. And between one and two is good. So in other words, if you're burning twenty million in a year to add an incremental ten million of ARR, you're doing quite well i…”