why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Goss: Zito generates $400 to $2,200 CPMs versus AdSense's $5 to $20
“But so their CPMs range from five to 20 dollars. Ours range from 400 to 2200 dollars CPMs, right?”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Goss: Samples.com domain was purchased for mid-six figures
“Six figures. I don't remember the exact number, but it was like mid six figures.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Goss: Samples.com recovered ad spend cash within 15 minutes
“Because we can recover our cash within like 15 minutes. So the cash-to-cash cycle is crazy fast.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Goss: Samples.com gets 300K daily visitors and 100K signups
“It's 300,000 people that come to the site and roughly a 100,000 of them sign up.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Goss: Samples.com generated ~$39M with $20M-$25M ad spend in 2016
“So top line was right around 39. I think total ad spend, I would put right around like the 20 to 25 range.”
Disclosure
Goss: Samples.com profits funded Zito over the last two years
“So I've spent the last two years basically reinvesting that money on the Zito side.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Stefan Goss: Samples.com spent $1 to make $1.25 on Facebook lead arbitrage
“So we spent like a buck and make a dollar 25.”