StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Mar 11, 2020 · 19m · top-founders

1691 Why This Company Rebranded with $950k Raised Helping Clients Customize Proposals

Andy Jednak · 9m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this SaaS interview, Andy Jednak and Brian of ClientPoint discuss the company's rebranding, 40% year-over-year revenue growth, unit economics, and hybrid go-to-market strategy. They outline how their digital sales enablement platform scales across SMB and enterprise tiers supported by a laddered convertible note and a globally distributed workforce.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 37.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 5.5 Guest teaching 1.8 Guest disagreement 1.8 Nathan pushing back 4.3
05100:0010:001:17–3:18 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Product Value Proposition and Pricing Structure Latka interrupts Andy's high-level marketing overview to demand concrete pricing metrics and per-seat SaaS costs. Andy cooperatively provides their $75 average per-seat rate and enterprise positioning.3:19–5:19 · Nathan as informed peer 4/10 Company Origins and the Paperless Proposal Rebrand Latka maps out the 10-year timeline and spin-out mechanics from a facilities business. Brian explains the tactical necessity of rebranding away from Paperless Proposal because modern prospects already consider themselves paperless.5:20–7:54 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Executive Transition and Laddered Convertible Note Fundraising Latka interrogates the rolling convertible note structure, warning about unfair risk distribution between early and late investors. Andy counters by explaining they use a laddered valuation cap structure across three distinct tranches.7:54–11:08 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Global Workforce and Distributed Team Structure Latka converts monthly churn into annual logo loss and questions their upsell levers. When told they only upsell seats, Latka pushes that utility and consumption pricing like HubSpot's are far more lucrative, which Andy acknowledges.11:09–14:45 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Unit Economics: CAC, LTV, and Payback Periods Andy shares their $7k CAC and $35k LTV, noting it accounts for gross margin, which Latka validates as proper financial discipline. Brian explains how they repurpose info-product webinar funnels for SaaS onboarding.14:45–18:17 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Financial Burn, User Scale, and Growth Trajectory Andy repeatedly deflects sharing specific customer counts and exact burn figures. Latka pushes back to extract a minimum seat threshold and calculates a baseline MRR floor before moving through the closing questions.1:17–3:18 · Guest teaching 1/10 Product Value Proposition and Pricing Structure Latka interrupts Andy's high-level marketing overview to demand concrete pricing metrics and per-seat SaaS costs. Andy cooperatively provides their $75 average per-seat rate and enterprise positioning.3:19–5:19 · Guest teaching 2/10 Company Origins and the Paperless Proposal Rebrand Latka maps out the 10-year timeline and spin-out mechanics from a facilities business. Brian explains the tactical necessity of rebranding away from Paperless Proposal because modern prospects already consider themselves paperless.5:20–7:54 · Guest teaching 4/10 Executive Transition and Laddered Convertible Note Fundraising Latka interrogates the rolling convertible note structure, warning about unfair risk distribution between early and late investors. Andy counters by explaining they use a laddered valuation cap structure across three distinct tranches.7:54–11:08 · Guest teaching 1/10 Global Workforce and Distributed Team Structure Latka converts monthly churn into annual logo loss and questions their upsell levers. When told they only upsell seats, Latka pushes that utility and consumption pricing like HubSpot's are far more lucrative, which Andy acknowledges.11:09–14:45 · Guest teaching 2/10 Unit Economics: CAC, LTV, and Payback Periods Andy shares their $7k CAC and $35k LTV, noting it accounts for gross margin, which Latka validates as proper financial discipline. Brian explains how they repurpose info-product webinar funnels for SaaS onboarding.14:45–18:17 · Guest teaching 1/10 Financial Burn, User Scale, and Growth Trajectory Andy repeatedly deflects sharing specific customer counts and exact burn figures. Latka pushes back to extract a minimum seat threshold and calculates a baseline MRR floor before moving through the closing questions.1:17–3:18 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Product Value Proposition and Pricing Structure Latka interrupts Andy's high-level marketing overview to demand concrete pricing metrics and per-seat SaaS costs. Andy cooperatively provides their $75 average per-seat rate and enterprise positioning.3:19–5:19 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Company Origins and the Paperless Proposal Rebrand Latka maps out the 10-year timeline and spin-out mechanics from a facilities business. Brian explains the tactical necessity of rebranding away from Paperless Proposal because modern prospects already consider themselves paperless.5:20–7:54 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Executive Transition and Laddered Convertible Note Fundraising Latka interrogates the rolling convertible note structure, warning about unfair risk distribution between early and late investors. Andy counters by explaining they use a laddered valuation cap structure across three distinct tranches.7:54–11:08 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Global Workforce and Distributed Team Structure Latka converts monthly churn into annual logo loss and questions their upsell levers. When told they only upsell seats, Latka pushes that utility and consumption pricing like HubSpot's are far more lucrative, which Andy acknowledges.11:09–14:45 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Unit Economics: CAC, LTV, and Payback Periods Andy shares their $7k CAC and $35k LTV, noting it accounts for gross margin, which Latka validates as proper financial discipline. Brian explains how they repurpose info-product webinar funnels for SaaS onboarding.14:45–18:17 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Financial Burn, User Scale, and Growth Trajectory Andy repeatedly deflects sharing specific customer counts and exact burn figures. Latka pushes back to extract a minimum seat threshold and calculates a baseline MRR floor before moving through the closing questions.1:17–3:18 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Product Value Proposition and Pricing Structure Latka interrupts Andy's high-level marketing overview to demand concrete pricing metrics and per-seat SaaS costs. Andy cooperatively provides their $75 average per-seat rate and enterprise positioning.3:19–5:19 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Company Origins and the Paperless Proposal Rebrand Latka maps out the 10-year timeline and spin-out mechanics from a facilities business. Brian explains the tactical necessity of rebranding away from Paperless Proposal because modern prospects already consider themselves paperless.5:20–7:54 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Executive Transition and Laddered Convertible Note Fundraising Latka interrogates the rolling convertible note structure, warning about unfair risk distribution between early and late investors. Andy counters by explaining they use a laddered valuation cap structure across three distinct tranches.7:54–11:08 · Nathan pushing back 5/10 Global Workforce and Distributed Team Structure Latka converts monthly churn into annual logo loss and questions their upsell levers. When told they only upsell seats, Latka pushes that utility and consumption pricing like HubSpot's are far more lucrative, which Andy acknowledges.11:09–14:45 · Nathan pushing back 3/10 Unit Economics: CAC, LTV, and Payback Periods Andy shares their $7k CAC and $35k LTV, noting it accounts for gross margin, which Latka validates as proper financial discipline. Brian explains how they repurpose info-product webinar funnels for SaaS onboarding.14:45–18:17 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Financial Burn, User Scale, and Growth Trajectory Andy repeatedly deflects sharing specific customer counts and exact burn figures. Latka pushes back to extract a minimum seat threshold and calculates a baseline MRR floor before moving through the closing questions.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 46.1% · guest 53.9%0:00 · Nathan 46.1% · guest 53.9%3:00 · Nathan 17.1% · guest 82.9%3:00 · Nathan 17.1% · guest 82.9%6:00 · Nathan 39.2% · guest 60.8%6:00 · Nathan 39.2% · guest 60.8%9:00 · Nathan 41.9% · guest 58.1%9:00 · Nathan 41.9% · guest 58.1%12:00 · Nathan 28.4% · guest 71.6%12:00 · Nathan 28.4% · guest 71.6%15:00 · Nathan 39.2% · guest 60.8%15:00 · Nathan 39.2% · guest 60.8%18:00 · Nathan 61.7% · guest 38.3%18:00 · Nathan 61.7% · guest 38.3%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 15:38 Andy refuses to disclose customer and seat metrics

Andy repeatedly stonewalls Latka's inquiries into concrete customer figures and active platform users, citing confidentiality restrictions.

 Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 7:06 Latka challenges open-ended convertible note risks

Latka refuses to let Andy gloss over a rolling convertible note, detailing how open-ended notes unfairly reward late money over early risk-takers.

 Biggest teaching moment ▶ 7:28 Andy reveals laddered valuation tranches

Andy clarifies the company avoided rolling note unfairness by structuring the fundraising into three distinct tranches with increasing valuation caps.

 Nathan holds their own ▶ 10:41 Latka contrasts seat models with consumption-based SaaS pricing

Latka demonstrates deep SaaS pricing knowledge by citing HubSpot and CloudCheckr models to show why seat-only upsells leave substantial expansion revenue on the table.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Product Value Proposition and Pricing Structure 5114 Latka interrupts Andy's high-level marketing overview to demand concrete pricing metrics and per-seat SaaS costs. Andy cooperatively provides their $75 average per-seat rate and enterprise positioning.
Company Origins and the Paperless Proposal Rebrand 4212 Latka maps out the 10-year timeline and spin-out mechanics from a facilities business. Brian explains the tactical necessity of rebranding away from Paperless Proposal because modern prospects already consider themselves paperless.
Executive Transition and Laddered Convertible Note Fundraising 7426 Latka interrogates the rolling convertible note structure, warning about unfair risk distribution between early and late investors. Andy counters by explaining they use a laddered valuation cap structure across three distinct tranches.
Global Workforce and Distributed Team Structure 6125 Latka converts monthly churn into annual logo loss and questions their upsell levers. When told they only upsell seats, Latka pushes that utility and consumption pricing like HubSpot's are far more lucrative, which Andy acknowledges.
Unit Economics: CAC, LTV, and Payback Periods 6213 Andy shares their $7k CAC and $35k LTV, noting it accounts for gross margin, which Latka validates as proper financial discipline. Brian explains how they repurpose info-product webinar funnels for SaaS onboarding.
Financial Burn, User Scale, and Growth Trajectory 5146 Andy repeatedly deflects sharing specific customer counts and exact burn figures. Latka pushes back to extract a minimum seat threshold and calculates a baseline MRR floor before moving through the closing questions.

Statements from this episode (12)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jednak: ClientPoint clients pay an average of $75 per seat
“On average, our clients pay 75 dollars per seat. The larger ones pay a little bit more, the smaller ones pay a little bit more, the larger ones pay quite a bit less.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 2:53
Assertion Supported
Jednak: ClientPoint began as an internal tool before 2010 commercial launch
“The company actually started as part of a facility services company that was in trouble because a lot of the biggest global players were trying to move into their territory. They needed to figure out how to look really, really big. So what they did was they de…”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 3:33
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jednak: ClientPoint raised $900K on a convertible note mostly from clients
“Right now we're in the midst of a convertible round. One of the board members brought in the first quarter million of that convertible round. When we started to build the team here at the beginning of the year, they decided to double it, and since then we brou…”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 6:07
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint targets a $5M to $7M round in Q2 next year
“We're going to one and a half million, and then we're going to do a five to seven million dollar round in Q two of next year.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 6:28
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint laddered its convertible note across three valuation caps
“We've laddered up the notes. It's actually in three different tranches at three different valuations.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 7:33
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint employs 25 full-time personnel
“We currently have 25 full-time people and a whole lot of contractors.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 7:59
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jednak: ClientPoint monthly churn is 1.25%, mostly from small businesses
“It's one and a quarter percent most of which from a lot of the smaller companies.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 8:57
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint reports $7,000 CAC and $35,000 gross margin-adjusted LTV
“Aggregate total lifetime, you know, value, you know, lifetime you know, value, you know, calculated obviously gross margin, not top line revenue. So calculated the right way is about 35,000 dollars on average across everyone from our tiniest to our biggest. So…”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 11:28
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint's CAC payback period is currently 14 months
“Well right now it's 14 months. You know, a pro forma over the next five years, you know, as we bring investment in, we're going to invest in the growth curve. The payback will change based on Different points in our customer, customer or our country, a company…”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 12:14
Assertion Supported
Jednak: ClientPoint serves enterprise clients Equifax, Principal Financial, and Securitas
“And on top of that, we have you know, a host of very large companies, people like Equifax, Principal Financial you know, Macmillan publishing, ortho clinical diagnostics, Securitas, world leader, the world leader in security, a lot of major, major corporations…”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 14:05
Disclosure
Jednak: ClientPoint aimed for 80% upfront annual payments in 2019
“Our goal in 2019 is 80% of all deals will be annual upfront paid.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 15:19
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jednak: ClientPoint is growing 40% year-over-year
“So we're, we are now at 40% year over year.”
Andy Jednak Mar 11, 2020 ▶ 16:26
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more