why aren't all 8 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Lemkin: The majority of Bill.com's revenue no longer comes from software
“The majority of bill.com's revenue is no longer from software.”
Assertion Contradicted
Lacerte: Bill.com has reached 121,000 customers
“Yeah, a 121,000.”
Assertion Partly supported
Lacerte: Bill grew its network by pricing ACH at 29¢ versus checks
“And on the payment side, we'd be like, we'll just cut you a check. So we didn't force people to connect their vendors, but then we did incentives from a pricing perspective, a check was A dollar 49 or whatever, a dollar 69 a day, and an ACH was 29 cents. So th…”
Assertion Contradicted
Lacerte: Bill net revenue retention increased to 124%
“In fact, I think in the last quarter numbers, we announced that the net revenue retention had bumped up to one 24, right?”
Assertion Supported
Divvy went from first institutional round to $2.5B exit in four years
“We went from our first institutional round of funding to getting acquired in, in about four years, right? In a two and a half billion dollar exit.”
Assertion Supported
Clayton: Bill.com revenue growth accelerated in each quarter since IPO
“If you look at our last four quarters since we've been public, every quarter it's accelerated in terms of growth.”
Assertion Partly supported
Lemkin: Bill.com's net retention rate expanded from 110% to 130% post-IPO
“Bill.com has gone from one 10 to almost one 30 since IPO.”
Assertion Supported
Blond: Bill.com acquired Divvy for $2.5 billion in 2021
“Last year, two and a half billion dollar acquisition by Bill.com.”