Jun 14, 2024 · 58m · more-or-less

#51: Vinod Khosla on What to Build in AI · More or Less Podcast

Vinod Khosla · 25m spoken Sam Lessin · 10m spoken Jessica Lessin · 9m spoken Dave Morin · 4m spoken Brit Morin · 2m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the More or Less podcast, hosts Jessica Lessin, Sam Lessin, Brit Morin, and Dave Morin interview veteran venture capitalist Vinod Khosla to discuss OpenAI's surging revenues, Apple Intelligence, falling compute costs, disciplined seed investing, and the macroeconomic impacts of AI.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The hosts hold 49.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 5.7 Guest teaching 3.7 Guest disagreement 3.1 The hosts pushing back 3.7
05100:0015:0030:0045:000:17–5:16 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Podcast Opening Title and Theme Song Jessica opens by questioning Apple's AI platform strategy and whether OpenAI exclusivity will hold given mentions of Gemini and Anthropic. Vinod largely agrees on Apple's strategic optionality while reframing the milestone around computers learning human intent directly.5:16–11:35 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Small vs. Large Models and Compute Economics Sam probes the tension between expensive PhD-level big models and on-device small models, and Vinod counters by advising startups to completely ignore compute costs as market forces drive prices down. Sam sharply pushes back on the exponential rise in training cluster costs, prompting Vinod to detail the five-year data feedback loop.11:35–19:35 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Vertical AI Disruption and Defensible Expertise Vinod highlights specialized venture bets like synthetic structural engineers, while Sam challenges whether domain expertise is actually defensible once codified into commodity models. Vinod firmly disagrees with Sam's analysis of general practice medicine versus oncology, arguing specialized workflows create durable value.19:35–22:55 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 Dave Morin on Apple's Platform Strategy and Developer Ecosystem Dave delivers an extended monologue analyzing Apple's launch, highlighting the rare execution trifecta of platform, product, and technology while critiquing the restrictive Swift wrapper that locks developers out of raw local model weights. Because this is a host-only platform breakdown without guest participation, guest and pushback scores are zero.22:55–30:00 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Venture Capital Discipline and AI Seed Valuations Sam lays out his skeptic case that seed-stage AI investing is broken by overfunded spinouts, finding rare alignment with Vinod who criticizes non-technical asset managers and ungrounded seed valuations. Vinod outlines his disciplined framework where 80 percent of his seed deals price under twenty-five million post.30:00–38:11 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Everyday AI, ChatGPT Prompts, and Autonomous Strawberry Farming The hosts and Vinod compare everyday ChatGPT workflows, transitioning into Vinod's portfolio company Zordi growing autonomous greenhouse strawberries. Sam repeatedly attacks the long-term margin and edge of boutique farming against agricultural giants like Monsanto, which Vinod brushes aside.38:11–42:54 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Deflationary Economics, Content IP, and Cultural Value Jessica asks about the legal standing and economics of training on copyrighted IP, which Vinod reframes into a broader macro thesis that AI will drive labor costs and expert fees to zero. When Sam suggests hiring humans as conversational data pumps, Vinod educates him on how value shifts entirely to experiential cultural phenomena like Taylor Swift.42:54–52:12 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Silicon Valley Politics, Regulation, and the 2024 Election Vinod articulates a sharp separation between traditional Republicans and MAGA extremists, openly condemning Trump's ethics while assessing Silicon Valley donors. When Jessica suggests the current administration has taken an overly heavy regulatory hand with tech, Vinod rejects the premise by praising bipartisan AI policy and lambasting sensationalist headline writers.52:12–57:34 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Co-Host Post-Interview Debrief and Cultural Recommendations In an executive post-interview debrief after Vinod logs off, the co-hosts unpack his assertions regarding compute deflation and automated greenhouse margins before trading theater recommendations. With no guest present in the segment, guest-side scores and host pushback remain at zero.0:17–5:16 · Guest teaching 3/10 Podcast Opening Title and Theme Song Jessica opens by questioning Apple's AI platform strategy and whether OpenAI exclusivity will hold given mentions of Gemini and Anthropic. Vinod largely agrees on Apple's strategic optionality while reframing the milestone around computers learning human intent directly.5:16–11:35 · Guest teaching 6/10 Small vs. Large Models and Compute Economics Sam probes the tension between expensive PhD-level big models and on-device small models, and Vinod counters by advising startups to completely ignore compute costs as market forces drive prices down. Sam sharply pushes back on the exponential rise in training cluster costs, prompting Vinod to detail the five-year data feedback loop.11:35–19:35 · Guest teaching 6/10 Vertical AI Disruption and Defensible Expertise Vinod highlights specialized venture bets like synthetic structural engineers, while Sam challenges whether domain expertise is actually defensible once codified into commodity models. Vinod firmly disagrees with Sam's analysis of general practice medicine versus oncology, arguing specialized workflows create durable value.19:35–22:55 · Guest teaching 0/10 Dave Morin on Apple's Platform Strategy and Developer Ecosystem Dave delivers an extended monologue analyzing Apple's launch, highlighting the rare execution trifecta of platform, product, and technology while critiquing the restrictive Swift wrapper that locks developers out of raw local model weights. Because this is a host-only platform breakdown without guest participation, guest and pushback scores are zero.22:55–30:00 · Guest teaching 4/10 Venture Capital Discipline and AI Seed Valuations Sam lays out his skeptic case that seed-stage AI investing is broken by overfunded spinouts, finding rare alignment with Vinod who criticizes non-technical asset managers and ungrounded seed valuations. Vinod outlines his disciplined framework where 80 percent of his seed deals price under twenty-five million post.30:00–38:11 · Guest teaching 4/10 Everyday AI, ChatGPT Prompts, and Autonomous Strawberry Farming The hosts and Vinod compare everyday ChatGPT workflows, transitioning into Vinod's portfolio company Zordi growing autonomous greenhouse strawberries. Sam repeatedly attacks the long-term margin and edge of boutique farming against agricultural giants like Monsanto, which Vinod brushes aside.38:11–42:54 · Guest teaching 5/10 Deflationary Economics, Content IP, and Cultural Value Jessica asks about the legal standing and economics of training on copyrighted IP, which Vinod reframes into a broader macro thesis that AI will drive labor costs and expert fees to zero. When Sam suggests hiring humans as conversational data pumps, Vinod educates him on how value shifts entirely to experiential cultural phenomena like Taylor Swift.42:54–52:12 · Guest teaching 5/10 Silicon Valley Politics, Regulation, and the 2024 Election Vinod articulates a sharp separation between traditional Republicans and MAGA extremists, openly condemning Trump's ethics while assessing Silicon Valley donors. When Jessica suggests the current administration has taken an overly heavy regulatory hand with tech, Vinod rejects the premise by praising bipartisan AI policy and lambasting sensationalist headline writers.52:12–57:34 · Guest teaching 0/10 Co-Host Post-Interview Debrief and Cultural Recommendations In an executive post-interview debrief after Vinod logs off, the co-hosts unpack his assertions regarding compute deflation and automated greenhouse margins before trading theater recommendations. With no guest present in the segment, guest-side scores and host pushback remain at zero.0:17–5:16 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Podcast Opening Title and Theme Song Jessica opens by questioning Apple's AI platform strategy and whether OpenAI exclusivity will hold given mentions of Gemini and Anthropic. Vinod largely agrees on Apple's strategic optionality while reframing the milestone around computers learning human intent directly.5:16–11:35 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Small vs. Large Models and Compute Economics Sam probes the tension between expensive PhD-level big models and on-device small models, and Vinod counters by advising startups to completely ignore compute costs as market forces drive prices down. Sam sharply pushes back on the exponential rise in training cluster costs, prompting Vinod to detail the five-year data feedback loop.11:35–19:35 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Vertical AI Disruption and Defensible Expertise Vinod highlights specialized venture bets like synthetic structural engineers, while Sam challenges whether domain expertise is actually defensible once codified into commodity models. Vinod firmly disagrees with Sam's analysis of general practice medicine versus oncology, arguing specialized workflows create durable value.19:35–22:55 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Dave Morin on Apple's Platform Strategy and Developer Ecosystem Dave delivers an extended monologue analyzing Apple's launch, highlighting the rare execution trifecta of platform, product, and technology while critiquing the restrictive Swift wrapper that locks developers out of raw local model weights. Because this is a host-only platform breakdown without guest participation, guest and pushback scores are zero.22:55–30:00 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Venture Capital Discipline and AI Seed Valuations Sam lays out his skeptic case that seed-stage AI investing is broken by overfunded spinouts, finding rare alignment with Vinod who criticizes non-technical asset managers and ungrounded seed valuations. Vinod outlines his disciplined framework where 80 percent of his seed deals price under twenty-five million post.30:00–38:11 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Everyday AI, ChatGPT Prompts, and Autonomous Strawberry Farming The hosts and Vinod compare everyday ChatGPT workflows, transitioning into Vinod's portfolio company Zordi growing autonomous greenhouse strawberries. Sam repeatedly attacks the long-term margin and edge of boutique farming against agricultural giants like Monsanto, which Vinod brushes aside.38:11–42:54 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Deflationary Economics, Content IP, and Cultural Value Jessica asks about the legal standing and economics of training on copyrighted IP, which Vinod reframes into a broader macro thesis that AI will drive labor costs and expert fees to zero. When Sam suggests hiring humans as conversational data pumps, Vinod educates him on how value shifts entirely to experiential cultural phenomena like Taylor Swift.42:54–52:12 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Silicon Valley Politics, Regulation, and the 2024 Election Vinod articulates a sharp separation between traditional Republicans and MAGA extremists, openly condemning Trump's ethics while assessing Silicon Valley donors. When Jessica suggests the current administration has taken an overly heavy regulatory hand with tech, Vinod rejects the premise by praising bipartisan AI policy and lambasting sensationalist headline writers.52:12–57:34 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Co-Host Post-Interview Debrief and Cultural Recommendations In an executive post-interview debrief after Vinod logs off, the co-hosts unpack his assertions regarding compute deflation and automated greenhouse margins before trading theater recommendations. With no guest present in the segment, guest-side scores and host pushback remain at zero.0:17–5:16 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Podcast Opening Title and Theme Song Jessica opens by questioning Apple's AI platform strategy and whether OpenAI exclusivity will hold given mentions of Gemini and Anthropic. Vinod largely agrees on Apple's strategic optionality while reframing the milestone around computers learning human intent directly.5:16–11:35 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Small vs. Large Models and Compute Economics Sam probes the tension between expensive PhD-level big models and on-device small models, and Vinod counters by advising startups to completely ignore compute costs as market forces drive prices down. Sam sharply pushes back on the exponential rise in training cluster costs, prompting Vinod to detail the five-year data feedback loop.11:35–19:35 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Vertical AI Disruption and Defensible Expertise Vinod highlights specialized venture bets like synthetic structural engineers, while Sam challenges whether domain expertise is actually defensible once codified into commodity models. Vinod firmly disagrees with Sam's analysis of general practice medicine versus oncology, arguing specialized workflows create durable value.19:35–22:55 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Dave Morin on Apple's Platform Strategy and Developer Ecosystem Dave delivers an extended monologue analyzing Apple's launch, highlighting the rare execution trifecta of platform, product, and technology while critiquing the restrictive Swift wrapper that locks developers out of raw local model weights. Because this is a host-only platform breakdown without guest participation, guest and pushback scores are zero.22:55–30:00 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Venture Capital Discipline and AI Seed Valuations Sam lays out his skeptic case that seed-stage AI investing is broken by overfunded spinouts, finding rare alignment with Vinod who criticizes non-technical asset managers and ungrounded seed valuations. Vinod outlines his disciplined framework where 80 percent of his seed deals price under twenty-five million post.30:00–38:11 · The hosts pushing back 5/10 Everyday AI, ChatGPT Prompts, and Autonomous Strawberry Farming The hosts and Vinod compare everyday ChatGPT workflows, transitioning into Vinod's portfolio company Zordi growing autonomous greenhouse strawberries. Sam repeatedly attacks the long-term margin and edge of boutique farming against agricultural giants like Monsanto, which Vinod brushes aside.38:11–42:54 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Deflationary Economics, Content IP, and Cultural Value Jessica asks about the legal standing and economics of training on copyrighted IP, which Vinod reframes into a broader macro thesis that AI will drive labor costs and expert fees to zero. When Sam suggests hiring humans as conversational data pumps, Vinod educates him on how value shifts entirely to experiential cultural phenomena like Taylor Swift.42:54–52:12 · The hosts pushing back 5/10 Silicon Valley Politics, Regulation, and the 2024 Election Vinod articulates a sharp separation between traditional Republicans and MAGA extremists, openly condemning Trump's ethics while assessing Silicon Valley donors. When Jessica suggests the current administration has taken an overly heavy regulatory hand with tech, Vinod rejects the premise by praising bipartisan AI policy and lambasting sensationalist headline writers.52:12–57:34 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Co-Host Post-Interview Debrief and Cultural Recommendations In an executive post-interview debrief after Vinod logs off, the co-hosts unpack his assertions regarding compute deflation and automated greenhouse margins before trading theater recommendations. With no guest present in the segment, guest-side scores and host pushback remain at zero.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 51.6% · guest 48.4%0:00 · the hosts 51.6% · guest 48.4%3:00 · the hosts 53.7% · guest 46.3%3:00 · the hosts 53.7% · guest 46.3%6:00 · the hosts 33.7% · guest 66.3%6:00 · the hosts 33.7% · guest 66.3%9:00 · the hosts 32.2% · guest 67.8%9:00 · the hosts 32.2% · guest 67.8%12:00 · the hosts 4% · guest 96%12:00 · the hosts 4% · guest 96%15:00 · the hosts 19.7% · guest 80.3%15:00 · the hosts 19.7% · guest 80.3%18:00 · the hosts 71.1% · guest 28.9%18:00 · the hosts 71.1% · guest 28.9%21:00 · the hosts 99% · guest 1%21:00 · the hosts 99% · guest 1%24:00 · the hosts 34.5% · guest 65.5%24:00 · the hosts 34.5% · guest 65.5%27:00 · the hosts 28.9% · guest 71.1%27:00 · the hosts 28.9% · guest 71.1%30:00 · the hosts 35.2% · guest 64.8%30:00 · the hosts 35.2% · guest 64.8%33:00 · the hosts 53.8% · guest 46.2%33:00 · the hosts 53.8% · guest 46.2%36:00 · the hosts 58.1% · guest 41.9%36:00 · the hosts 58.1% · guest 41.9%39:00 · the hosts 47% · guest 53%39:00 · the hosts 47% · guest 53%42:00 · the hosts 32.9% · guest 67.1%42:00 · the hosts 32.9% · guest 67.1%45:00 · the hosts 31.7% · guest 68.3%45:00 · the hosts 31.7% · guest 68.3%48:00 · the hosts 60.1% · guest 39.9%48:00 · the hosts 60.1% · guest 39.9%51:00 · the hosts 79.2% · guest 20.8%51:00 · the hosts 79.2% · guest 20.8%54:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%54:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%57:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%57:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 7:36 Vinod dismisses the compute cost premise

Vinod directly rejects Sam's line of reasoning about balancing compute expenditure across different model tiers, bluntly advising all startups to ignore compute costs entirely.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 8:42 Sam challenges model cost deflation with training realities

Sam interrupts Vinod's deflationary thesis by highlighting that successive frontier models require an order of magnitude more capital to train, directly contesting the premise that compute can be ignored.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 8:47 Vinod explains frontier model usage amortization

Vinod breaks down the structural economics of foundation models, explaining why high upfront training costs compel providers to maximize inference volume and data capture rather than short-term revenue.

The host holds their own ▶ 20:55 Dave exposes Apple's restrictive developer sandbox

Dave demonstrates authoritative platform knowledge by exposing that Apple has wrapped local models inside Swift UI components without granting developers raw access to on-device weights.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Podcast Opening Title and Theme Song 5323 Jessica opens by questioning Apple's AI platform strategy and whether OpenAI exclusivity will hold given mentions of Gemini and Anthropic. Vinod largely agrees on Apple's strategic optionality while reframing the milestone around computers learning human intent directly.
Small vs. Large Models and Compute Economics 6656 Sam probes the tension between expensive PhD-level big models and on-device small models, and Vinod counters by advising startups to completely ignore compute costs as market forces drive prices down. Sam sharply pushes back on the exponential rise in training cluster costs, prompting Vinod to detail the five-year data feedback loop.
Vertical AI Disruption and Defensible Expertise 6666 Vinod highlights specialized venture bets like synthetic structural engineers, while Sam challenges whether domain expertise is actually defensible once codified into commodity models. Vinod firmly disagrees with Sam's analysis of general practice medicine versus oncology, arguing specialized workflows create durable value.
Dave Morin on Apple's Platform Strategy and Developer Ecosystem 7000 Dave delivers an extended monologue analyzing Apple's launch, highlighting the rare execution trifecta of platform, product, and technology while critiquing the restrictive Swift wrapper that locks developers out of raw local model weights. Because this is a host-only platform breakdown without guest participation, guest and pushback scores are zero.
Venture Capital Discipline and AI Seed Valuations 6424 Sam lays out his skeptic case that seed-stage AI investing is broken by overfunded spinouts, finding rare alignment with Vinod who criticizes non-technical asset managers and ungrounded seed valuations. Vinod outlines his disciplined framework where 80 percent of his seed deals price under twenty-five million post.
Everyday AI, ChatGPT Prompts, and Autonomous Strawberry Farming 5435 The hosts and Vinod compare everyday ChatGPT workflows, transitioning into Vinod's portfolio company Zordi growing autonomous greenhouse strawberries. Sam repeatedly attacks the long-term margin and edge of boutique farming against agricultural giants like Monsanto, which Vinod brushes aside.
Deflationary Economics, Content IP, and Cultural Value 5544 Jessica asks about the legal standing and economics of training on copyrighted IP, which Vinod reframes into a broader macro thesis that AI will drive labor costs and expert fees to zero. When Sam suggests hiring humans as conversational data pumps, Vinod educates him on how value shifts entirely to experiential cultural phenomena like Taylor Swift.
Silicon Valley Politics, Regulation, and the 2024 Election 5565 Vinod articulates a sharp separation between traditional Republicans and MAGA extremists, openly condemning Trump's ethics while assessing Silicon Valley donors. When Jessica suggests the current administration has taken an overly heavy regulatory hand with tech, Vinod rejects the premise by praising bipartisan AI policy and lambasting sensationalist headline writers.
Co-Host Post-Interview Debrief and Cultural Recommendations 6000 In an executive post-interview debrief after Vinod logs off, the co-hosts unpack his assertions regarding compute deflation and automated greenhouse margins before trading theater recommendations. With no guest present in the segment, guest-side scores and host pushback remain at zero.

Statements from this episode (22)

Opinion
Khosla: Apple Partnership Validates OpenAI as the Best LLM
“Obviously from an open AI perspective, it clearly establishes where open AI is in the competition for the best LLMs. Obviously many people wanted that business. And many things were evaluated, and so it's really rewarding to see where Apple thinks the best AI …”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 2:46
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Khosla: Small models will never substitute for large, human-level AI models
“If you want human level intelligence from model, it'll be a big model, and there'll be a couple of them around. Some better than others, some a year or two ahead of others, but I don't think small models substitute for big models, but they do some things reall…”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 6:03
Prediction Held up
Khosla: AI inference costs will drop up to 10x by June 2025
“I think what will happen is the expensive PhD will become dirt cheap. My bet is a year from now, it'll cost one-fifth to one-tenth of what it does today.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 7:38
Insight
Khosla: Startups should ignore compute costs; AI software optimizations become worthless
“And my advice to all our startups is ignore the cost of compute. Because any assumption you make, any dollar you spend on optimizing your software will be worthless within the year.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 7:49
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Khosla: Open-source AI models will die due to massive training costs
“It is costing an order of magnitude more to train, and that's why I don't think open source models will be viable because of the training costs.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 8:48
Insight
Khosla: AI labs must prioritize usage and training data over near-term revenue
“So I'm pretty convinced The next few years, the revenue isn't the important metric. You don't want to, of course, lose so much money you can't afford it, but you're not trying to make tons of money. You're trying to get tons of usage and you're trying to get t…”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 9:56
Opinion
Khosla: OpenAI executes crisply, while Google has great technology but poor execution
“I think OpenAI has been very good in execution, but Google has great technology and technologies. They just haven't been as crisp about their execution.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 10:47
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Khosla: Massive incumbent tech giants will dominate the large language model market
“Large LLMs will belong to the large players, players who can run on train on very large clusters, people who can pay for proprietary content, whether it's with Reddit or somebody else.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 12:15
Opinion
Khosla: Investing in startups building independent GPU cloud infrastructure is silly
“Beyond the model itself, and I think it's silly to invest in the cloud, people who are buying GPUs to build clouds.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 13:59
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Khosla: AI will eventually make almost all professional human expertise essentially free
“One of my big forecasts is almost all expertise will be free.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 14:32
Disclosure
Khosla: Cognition's Devin is building an autonomous AI programmer, not a Copilot
“Of course, we invest in something like Devon. That's very popular. Everybody knows about it. They're building an AI programmer. They're not building tools for programmers like Copilot. They're building a programmer.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 14:59
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Khosla: AI primary care and therapy will become larger than specialized AI
“I think the specialties will become embedded in the generic. And the general, like primary care and mental health therapy are two examples that I think will be larger businesses because there's other aspects than just the knowledge aspect.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 19:06
Assertion Supported
Morin: Apple restricts developers from directly accessing its on-device AI models
“The one thing that I was disappointed about is that you cannot access these local models directly. It's something that a lot of folks aren't talking about. They've put a pretty intense wrapper around it, at least on the developer front. You know, you can use t…”
Dave Morin Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 21:38
Disclosure
Khosla: Has never taken management fees in 20 years of venture investing
“Since I started the firm 20 years ago, I've never been I've taken a dollar in fees.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 23:58
Opinion
Lessin: Seed-stage AI investing is a fool's errand for venture capitalists
“I think most seed investors getting into AI are playing a fool's errand because it's not a place where one to three million dollars Really can move the needle in terms of value, in terms of what the game is.”
Sam Lessin Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 24:22
Insight
Khosla: Blindly funding Google DeepMind spinouts with $2M seed checks is bad
“Anytime somebody leaves deep, deep mind, give them two million dollars, that's a bad strategy.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 26:14
Disclosure
Khosla: 80% of Khosla Ventures seed investments are under $25M post-money valuation
“I would guess That 80% of the investments we've made in C are below twenty-five million posts.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 27:42
Disclosure
Khosla: Passes on 80% to 90% of startups seeking billion-dollar valuations
“I'd say 80% or 90% of the billion dollar valuations, maybe more, we pass on.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 28:10
Assertion Partly supported
Khosla: Portfolio company Zordi operates fully automated, human-free strawberry greenhouses
“We have a greenhouse that's fully automated, including picking the strawberries, which would be hard to do by hand. And they sell at like five times the price in every New York restaurant prices them at like five bucks a strawberry or something. But there are …”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 37:05
Opinion
Khosla: Regulation ensures Europe will never participate in the tech industry again
“I think the Europeans, for example, have ensured they'll never participate in tech again. You know, they keep shooting themselves in the foot.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 46:58
Opinion
Khosla: Marginalizing Muslims is the one thing that could slow India's economy
“Leaving a community of Muslims behind is such a bad idea. It's the one thing that can slow up a rapidly growing economy.”
Vinod Khosla Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 50:54
Opinion
Lessin: Frontier foundation AI models are great research projects, not great businesses
“Like what, it's a great research project. I don't see it being a great business personally.”
Sam Lessin Jun 14, 2024 ▶ 54:30
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 150 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.