Joel Becker of METR discusses why paper-writing and code benchmarks capture only a fraction of what is required to fully automate AI research and development.
“There's this, Very long tail of things potentially involved in in R&D that would perhaps need to be fully automated in order to lead to capabilities explosion. I expect we're measuring, you know, in some ways only, only a small proportion of, only a small proportion of those capabilities. And so I expect, you know, the capabilities needed for the full loop to close to come somewhat later.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Joel Becker
Opinion
Becker: Overly Bullish AI Developer Speedup Estimates Are Inflated
“I do think that very bullish estimates of speed up today are, you know, to some extent inflated by what we document in that original paper, that people's expectations of speed up tend to be too optimistic, it seems. They also tend to be inflated, I think, by n…”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 20:08Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
Insight
Becker: Algorithmic Progress in AI Is Strictly a Function of Compute
“The suggestion in this paper is that if you think that algorithmic progress, you know, that, that is coming up with the transformer, coming up with RLHF, you know, MOEs, all of this stuff, better learning rate schedules is, is is itself a function of compute b…”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 35:18Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
PredictionNot checkable as stated
Becker: Halving AI Compute Growth Halves Algorithmic Progress and Milestones
“And both of them both of those components half when compute halves sort of trivially, because compute is halving, and algorithmic progress halves because compute is this important input, and compute halves, then you might expect time horizon growth to half. An…”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 36:12Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
Insight
Becker: AI Scaffolding Value Does Not Persist Across Model Generations
“Within model generation, it's valuable, and across model generations, it's not so valuable.”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 59:09Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
Disclosure
Becker: Stopped Investing in Personal Software Engineering Skills Due to AI
“Intentionally not investing in engineering skills, because the areas are getting so good, maybe that's the wrong decision.”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 59:13Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
AssertionSupported
Becker: Current Frontier Models Cannot Cause Catastrophic Harm
“We find, we think it's not capable enough, you know, on the basis of some of this capabilities evidence that you've alluded to commit these catastrophic harms.”
Joel BeckerFeb 27, 2026▶ 2:34Measuring Exponential Trends Rising (in AI) — Joel Becker, METR
Made with StarZero
Turn any episode into a week of clips.
This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.