Chai-2

3 statements across 1 episodes · 2 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 people on the record · first statement Aug 11, 2026 by Matt McPartlon · said 28 times in 1 episodes since 2026 · across every show →

Mentions by year

brought up most by RJ Haneke (9), Neil Patil (8), Matt McPartlon (7)

tap a year for its mentions
001513012026episodesmentions
0112026episodes it came up in
00150.53012026episodesmentions per episode

every mention, scene by scene, with the transcript →

Everything said about Chai-2, oldest first

Aug 11, 2026
Disclosure
McPartlon: Chai-2 was evaluated on targets with no known antibody binders
“We actually chose these targets specifically like to have no known antibody binder. So like if we did get a hit, like it was definitely the first antibody hit to this target.”
Matt McPartlon Aug 11, 2026 ▶ 35:01 🔬They Thought the Model Was Broken — Matt McPartlon & Neil Patil, Chai Discovery
Aug 11, 2026 positive
Assertion Supported
McPartlon: Chai-2 generated binders for 25 targets with 20% hit rate
“So we designed antibodies to 50 targets for that paper, got binders to about half of them with being on average around a 20% hit rate for binding.”
Matt McPartlon Aug 11, 2026 ▶ 22:51 🔬They Thought the Model Was Broken — Matt McPartlon & Neil Patil, Chai Discovery
Aug 11, 2026 positive
Assertion Supported
McPartlon: Chai-2 achieved 0.33 angstrom error in cryo-EM testing
“And in this case, it was a 0.33 angstrom error, which is one third the width of an atom.”
Matt McPartlon Aug 11, 2026 ▶ 34:45 🔬They Thought the Model Was Broken — Matt McPartlon & Neil Patil, Chai Discovery
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.