The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Rudolph: Banza lot testing was 97% lower than activist claims
“We published a statement very quickly on our website that, you know, not only acknowledged historical testing results for what was sort of being questioned, but also even tested the same lot. It was 97% lower than what was being claimed.”
Banza intentionally omitted gluten-free labels to target mainstream consumers
“We actually intentionally did not put gluten-free on the front of our packaging because we wanted to be seen as a mainstream option for anyone who's buying pasta”
Suplicy: Winning health food brands reintroduce ancient staples conveniently
“What I think is very interesting between our three brands is that we are focusing on things that people have been needing for thousands of years. We're just kind of reintroducing them in a way that is more convenient.”
Rudolph: Chickpea pasta did not exist commercially prior to Banza
“Chickpea pasta did not exist, so there was no precedent for manufacturing it”