solar geoengineering
11 statements across 3 episodes · 3 bullish · 3 bearish · 3 people on the record · first statement Jun 16, 2022 by Dan Visioni · across every show →
Everything said about solar geoengineering, oldest first
Jun 16, 2022 neutral
Jun 16, 2022 bearish
Jun 16, 2022 negative
Jun 16, 2022 positive
Jun 16, 2022 neutral
Visioni: Solar geoengineering cannot fully replicate a low-CO2 climate
“By cooling with these methods or with any methods, we would not be just turning back the dial of time to a time where there was less CO₂, because the sulfates do cool differently than the CO₂ warps. And even if maybe we can try and get it as close as possible,…”
Jun 16, 2022 neutral
Feb 2, 2023 negative
Jul 1, 2026 positive
Yedvab: Safe geoengineering alternatives reduce the risk of rogue deployments
“I believe that having a safe option essentially lowers the risk That people will go the wrong way because there is an alternative. Or to say it otherwise, if we didn't have options, I would say that the likelihood that someone would go the wrong way would be m…”
Jul 1, 2026
Yedvab: 0.5 degrees of cooling costs $10 billion using Stardust particles
“So in, in terms of giving orders of magnitude or estimates, and we have a very detailed breakdown for every million tons of particles that will be Dispersed, the cost will be roughly ten billion dollars, and you'll get half a degree of cooling.”
Jul 1, 2026 positive
Yedvab: Having no geoengineering options is worse than moral hazard risk
“I would argue that, you know, Having no option is not a good balance for this. You need to have options. You want to make sure that you are not stuck in a position that in 10 years from now, people are saying, why no one worked on, on giving us option?”