The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Musk: Grokopedia is more neutral, accurate, and detailed than Wikipedia
“We used that latest version of Grok to create Grokopedia which I think is much more, it's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but it actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page.”
Musk: Grokopedia was built by AI modifying 1M top Wikipedia articles
“We took that version of Grok and said, okay, cycle through the million most popular articles in Wikipedia and add modify and delete. So that means research the rest of the internet whatever's publicly available and Correct what's correct Wikipedia articles and…”
Sacks accuses Wikipedia of explicitly censoring conservative publications as reliable sources
“Wikipedia is massively biased because they literally have censored the leading conservative publications from being citations and sources in Wikipedia.”
Sacks: Wikipedia has become hyper-partisan and biased by activist editors
“Wikipedia is so biased, and it's a constant war, you know, if something gets corrected, five minutes later, there'll be an army of people trying to, I mean, it's become hyper-partisan, and there's, like, activists all over it.”