Aug 18, 2026 · 55m · allin

Mass Surveillance, Police Misuse, and Who Controls Your Flock Cameras with Flock CEO, Garret Langley

Garrett Langley · 25m spoken Jason Calacanis · 23m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Jason Calacanis interviews Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley to explore the operational capabilities, ethical boundaries, and privacy safeguards of automated license plate readers and emergency drones across American cities.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The hosts hold 47% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 4.5 Guest teaching 3.7 Guest disagreement 1.0 The hosts pushing back 2.4
05100:0015:0030:0045:002:16–4:22 · The hosts as informed peer 3/10 Flock's Origins, Scale, and Crime Reduction Footprint Jason opens the interview by framing Flock's balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Garrett explains the company's background, core technology footprint, and statistics regarding crime reduction and missing persons recovery.4:22–8:15 · The hosts as informed peer 4/10 City Council Approvals and Data Retention Policies Jason probes into how communities approve Flock cameras and how data retention policies work to prevent rogue access. Garrett outlines the city council approval process and Flock's default data retention timeline shift from 30 days to 7 days.8:15–13:00 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Crime Clearance Rates vs. Privacy: 7 Days to 30 Days Jason asks about clearance stats across retention windows and describes his personal security setup. Garrett explains that 90% of crimes are cleared in the first 7 days, but complex cases like delayed reported assaults or missing persons need longer, while clarifying that Flock does not do facial recognition or video recording like some competitors.13:00–18:18 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Activism, Camera Vandalism, and Public Communications Jason challenges Garrett on his public communications, calling out his previous comments framing camera vandals as terrorists when they are primarily privacy activists. Garrett acknowledges making communication mistakes while pointing out the felony legal consequences of damaging municipal safety cameras.18:18–26:00 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Combatting Police Abuse with Automated Audit Assistance Jason questions what mechanisms prevent police officers from abusing ALPR data for personal stalking or corruption. Garrett details the new automated audit assistant feature that identifies suspicious search patterns, citing real-world terminations of offending officers.26:00–32:42 · The hosts as informed peer 0/10 Sponsor Message: Numeral Sales Tax Solution Mid-roll commercial break sponsor message for Numeral Sales Tax Solution.32:42–37:55 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Churn, Misinformation, and Ethical Competition Jason and Garrett discuss city cancellations, competitor tactics, and ethical lines in surveillance technology. Garrett clarifies that many cancellations stem from misinformation confusing Flock with facial-recognition competitors, and several cities subsequently reinstated Flock.37:55–43:02 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Vehicle Identification Technology and Socioeconomic Perspectives on Safety Jason and Garrett examine vehicle feature tagging (dents, roof racks) and delve into the socioeconomic divide regarding public safety, contrasting affluent neighborhoods with gated security against underprivileged communities that rely on municipal cameras.43:02–45:35 · The hosts as informed peer 4/10 Community Security Choices and Personal Safety Perspectives Jason articulates his parental perspective on accepting license plate tracking over 30 days while opposing facial recognition. Garrett shares an anecdote of an adversarial local politician whose perspective changed after being targeted by violence.45:35–54:29 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Navigating Public Scrutiny, Morale, and Executive Accountability Jason brings up public criticism, internal team morale, and media scrutiny like Tucker Carlson's critique, advising proactive transparency. Garrett introduces Flock's expanding drone business and explains how rooftop drones de-escalate 911 calls by rapidly assessing situations before armed police arrive.54:29–55:36 · The hosts as informed peer 4/10 State Surveillance Regulations and Interview Conclusion Jason and Garrett conclude by comparing state-level ALPR data retention regulations across the United States (from New Hampshire's 3-minute limit to Washington's 21 days). Jason wraps up emphasizing local community choice.2:16–4:22 · Guest teaching 4/10 Flock's Origins, Scale, and Crime Reduction Footprint Jason opens the interview by framing Flock's balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Garrett explains the company's background, core technology footprint, and statistics regarding crime reduction and missing persons recovery.4:22–8:15 · Guest teaching 3/10 City Council Approvals and Data Retention Policies Jason probes into how communities approve Flock cameras and how data retention policies work to prevent rogue access. Garrett outlines the city council approval process and Flock's default data retention timeline shift from 30 days to 7 days.8:15–13:00 · Guest teaching 5/10 Crime Clearance Rates vs. Privacy: 7 Days to 30 Days Jason asks about clearance stats across retention windows and describes his personal security setup. Garrett explains that 90% of crimes are cleared in the first 7 days, but complex cases like delayed reported assaults or missing persons need longer, while clarifying that Flock does not do facial recognition or video recording like some competitors.13:00–18:18 · Guest teaching 4/10 Activism, Camera Vandalism, and Public Communications Jason challenges Garrett on his public communications, calling out his previous comments framing camera vandals as terrorists when they are primarily privacy activists. Garrett acknowledges making communication mistakes while pointing out the felony legal consequences of damaging municipal safety cameras.18:18–26:00 · Guest teaching 5/10 Combatting Police Abuse with Automated Audit Assistance Jason questions what mechanisms prevent police officers from abusing ALPR data for personal stalking or corruption. Garrett details the new automated audit assistant feature that identifies suspicious search patterns, citing real-world terminations of offending officers.26:00–32:42 · Guest teaching 0/10 Sponsor Message: Numeral Sales Tax Solution Mid-roll commercial break sponsor message for Numeral Sales Tax Solution.32:42–37:55 · Guest teaching 4/10 Churn, Misinformation, and Ethical Competition Jason and Garrett discuss city cancellations, competitor tactics, and ethical lines in surveillance technology. Garrett clarifies that many cancellations stem from misinformation confusing Flock with facial-recognition competitors, and several cities subsequently reinstated Flock.37:55–43:02 · Guest teaching 4/10 Vehicle Identification Technology and Socioeconomic Perspectives on Safety Jason and Garrett examine vehicle feature tagging (dents, roof racks) and delve into the socioeconomic divide regarding public safety, contrasting affluent neighborhoods with gated security against underprivileged communities that rely on municipal cameras.43:02–45:35 · Guest teaching 3/10 Community Security Choices and Personal Safety Perspectives Jason articulates his parental perspective on accepting license plate tracking over 30 days while opposing facial recognition. Garrett shares an anecdote of an adversarial local politician whose perspective changed after being targeted by violence.45:35–54:29 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating Public Scrutiny, Morale, and Executive Accountability Jason brings up public criticism, internal team morale, and media scrutiny like Tucker Carlson's critique, advising proactive transparency. Garrett introduces Flock's expanding drone business and explains how rooftop drones de-escalate 911 calls by rapidly assessing situations before armed police arrive.54:29–55:36 · Guest teaching 4/10 State Surveillance Regulations and Interview Conclusion Jason and Garrett conclude by comparing state-level ALPR data retention regulations across the United States (from New Hampshire's 3-minute limit to Washington's 21 days). Jason wraps up emphasizing local community choice.2:16–4:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Flock's Origins, Scale, and Crime Reduction Footprint Jason opens the interview by framing Flock's balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Garrett explains the company's background, core technology footprint, and statistics regarding crime reduction and missing persons recovery.4:22–8:15 · Guest disagreement 1/10 City Council Approvals and Data Retention Policies Jason probes into how communities approve Flock cameras and how data retention policies work to prevent rogue access. Garrett outlines the city council approval process and Flock's default data retention timeline shift from 30 days to 7 days.8:15–13:00 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Crime Clearance Rates vs. Privacy: 7 Days to 30 Days Jason asks about clearance stats across retention windows and describes his personal security setup. Garrett explains that 90% of crimes are cleared in the first 7 days, but complex cases like delayed reported assaults or missing persons need longer, while clarifying that Flock does not do facial recognition or video recording like some competitors.13:00–18:18 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Activism, Camera Vandalism, and Public Communications Jason challenges Garrett on his public communications, calling out his previous comments framing camera vandals as terrorists when they are primarily privacy activists. Garrett acknowledges making communication mistakes while pointing out the felony legal consequences of damaging municipal safety cameras.18:18–26:00 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Combatting Police Abuse with Automated Audit Assistance Jason questions what mechanisms prevent police officers from abusing ALPR data for personal stalking or corruption. Garrett details the new automated audit assistant feature that identifies suspicious search patterns, citing real-world terminations of offending officers.26:00–32:42 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Sponsor Message: Numeral Sales Tax Solution Mid-roll commercial break sponsor message for Numeral Sales Tax Solution.32:42–37:55 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Churn, Misinformation, and Ethical Competition Jason and Garrett discuss city cancellations, competitor tactics, and ethical lines in surveillance technology. Garrett clarifies that many cancellations stem from misinformation confusing Flock with facial-recognition competitors, and several cities subsequently reinstated Flock.37:55–43:02 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Vehicle Identification Technology and Socioeconomic Perspectives on Safety Jason and Garrett examine vehicle feature tagging (dents, roof racks) and delve into the socioeconomic divide regarding public safety, contrasting affluent neighborhoods with gated security against underprivileged communities that rely on municipal cameras.43:02–45:35 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Community Security Choices and Personal Safety Perspectives Jason articulates his parental perspective on accepting license plate tracking over 30 days while opposing facial recognition. Garrett shares an anecdote of an adversarial local politician whose perspective changed after being targeted by violence.45:35–54:29 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Navigating Public Scrutiny, Morale, and Executive Accountability Jason brings up public criticism, internal team morale, and media scrutiny like Tucker Carlson's critique, advising proactive transparency. Garrett introduces Flock's expanding drone business and explains how rooftop drones de-escalate 911 calls by rapidly assessing situations before armed police arrive.54:29–55:36 · Guest disagreement 1/10 State Surveillance Regulations and Interview Conclusion Jason and Garrett conclude by comparing state-level ALPR data retention regulations across the United States (from New Hampshire's 3-minute limit to Washington's 21 days). Jason wraps up emphasizing local community choice.2:16–4:22 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Flock's Origins, Scale, and Crime Reduction Footprint Jason opens the interview by framing Flock's balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Garrett explains the company's background, core technology footprint, and statistics regarding crime reduction and missing persons recovery.4:22–8:15 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 City Council Approvals and Data Retention Policies Jason probes into how communities approve Flock cameras and how data retention policies work to prevent rogue access. Garrett outlines the city council approval process and Flock's default data retention timeline shift from 30 days to 7 days.8:15–13:00 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Crime Clearance Rates vs. Privacy: 7 Days to 30 Days Jason asks about clearance stats across retention windows and describes his personal security setup. Garrett explains that 90% of crimes are cleared in the first 7 days, but complex cases like delayed reported assaults or missing persons need longer, while clarifying that Flock does not do facial recognition or video recording like some competitors.13:00–18:18 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Activism, Camera Vandalism, and Public Communications Jason challenges Garrett on his public communications, calling out his previous comments framing camera vandals as terrorists when they are primarily privacy activists. Garrett acknowledges making communication mistakes while pointing out the felony legal consequences of damaging municipal safety cameras.18:18–26:00 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Combatting Police Abuse with Automated Audit Assistance Jason questions what mechanisms prevent police officers from abusing ALPR data for personal stalking or corruption. Garrett details the new automated audit assistant feature that identifies suspicious search patterns, citing real-world terminations of offending officers.26:00–32:42 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Sponsor Message: Numeral Sales Tax Solution Mid-roll commercial break sponsor message for Numeral Sales Tax Solution.32:42–37:55 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Churn, Misinformation, and Ethical Competition Jason and Garrett discuss city cancellations, competitor tactics, and ethical lines in surveillance technology. Garrett clarifies that many cancellations stem from misinformation confusing Flock with facial-recognition competitors, and several cities subsequently reinstated Flock.37:55–43:02 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Vehicle Identification Technology and Socioeconomic Perspectives on Safety Jason and Garrett examine vehicle feature tagging (dents, roof racks) and delve into the socioeconomic divide regarding public safety, contrasting affluent neighborhoods with gated security against underprivileged communities that rely on municipal cameras.43:02–45:35 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 Community Security Choices and Personal Safety Perspectives Jason articulates his parental perspective on accepting license plate tracking over 30 days while opposing facial recognition. Garrett shares an anecdote of an adversarial local politician whose perspective changed after being targeted by violence.45:35–54:29 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Navigating Public Scrutiny, Morale, and Executive Accountability Jason brings up public criticism, internal team morale, and media scrutiny like Tucker Carlson's critique, advising proactive transparency. Garrett introduces Flock's expanding drone business and explains how rooftop drones de-escalate 911 calls by rapidly assessing situations before armed police arrive.54:29–55:36 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 State Surveillance Regulations and Interview Conclusion Jason and Garrett conclude by comparing state-level ALPR data retention regulations across the United States (from New Hampshire's 3-minute limit to Washington's 21 days). Jason wraps up emphasizing local community choice.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 84.9% · guest 15.1%0:00 · the hosts 84.9% · guest 15.1%3:00 · the hosts 47.9% · guest 52.1%3:00 · the hosts 47.9% · guest 52.1%6:00 · the hosts 15.6% · guest 84.4%6:00 · the hosts 15.6% · guest 84.4%9:00 · the hosts 50.2% · guest 49.8%9:00 · the hosts 50.2% · guest 49.8%12:00 · the hosts 66.2% · guest 33.8%12:00 · the hosts 66.2% · guest 33.8%15:00 · the hosts 27.8% · guest 72.2%15:00 · the hosts 27.8% · guest 72.2%18:00 · the hosts 20.8% · guest 79.2%18:00 · the hosts 20.8% · guest 79.2%21:00 · the hosts 50.3% · guest 49.7%21:00 · the hosts 50.3% · guest 49.7%24:00 · the hosts 57.1% · guest 42.9%24:00 · the hosts 57.1% · guest 42.9%27:00 · the hosts 53.2% · guest 46.8%27:00 · the hosts 53.2% · guest 46.8%30:00 · the hosts 28.3% · guest 71.7%30:00 · the hosts 28.3% · guest 71.7%33:00 · the hosts 38.4% · guest 61.6%33:00 · the hosts 38.4% · guest 61.6%36:00 · the hosts 38.5% · guest 61.5%36:00 · the hosts 38.5% · guest 61.5%39:00 · the hosts 74.1% · guest 25.9%39:00 · the hosts 74.1% · guest 25.9%42:00 · the hosts 69.2% · guest 30.8%42:00 · the hosts 69.2% · guest 30.8%45:00 · the hosts 34.9% · guest 65.1%45:00 · the hosts 34.9% · guest 65.1%48:00 · the hosts 39% · guest 61%48:00 · the hosts 39% · guest 61%51:00 · the hosts 41.6% · guest 58.4%51:00 · the hosts 41.6% · guest 58.4%54:00 · the hosts 59.9% · guest 40.1%54:00 · the hosts 59.9% · guest 40.1%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 16:02 Garrett rejects the zero-sum privacy vs safety mindset

Garrett firmly pushes back against one-sided critics, stating that those who look exclusively at privacy or safety are both on the wrong side of the equation.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 13:30 Jason calls out Garrett's rhetoric and poor communications

Jason refuses Garrett's previous framing of camera vandals as terrorists, correcting him that they are privacy activists reacting to a perceived lack of nuance.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 8:36 Garrett educates on delayed crime reporting reality

Garrett explains the stark realities of crime clearance, showing why a 7-day retention fails homicide welfare checks and sexual assault investigations.

The host holds their own ▶ 22:15 Jason proposes enterprise dual-authorization architecture

Jason leverages his tech enterprise background to outline a multi-key supervisor approval architecture to mitigate internal police data abuse.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Flock's Origins, Scale, and Crime Reduction Footprint 3412 Jason opens the interview by framing Flock's balance between public safety and privacy concerns. Garrett explains the company's background, core technology footprint, and statistics regarding crime reduction and missing persons recovery.
City Council Approvals and Data Retention Policies 4312 Jason probes into how communities approve Flock cameras and how data retention policies work to prevent rogue access. Garrett outlines the city council approval process and Flock's default data retention timeline shift from 30 days to 7 days.
Crime Clearance Rates vs. Privacy: 7 Days to 30 Days 5513 Jason asks about clearance stats across retention windows and describes his personal security setup. Garrett explains that 90% of crimes are cleared in the first 7 days, but complex cases like delayed reported assaults or missing persons need longer, while clarifying that Flock does not do facial recognition or video recording like some competitors.
Activism, Camera Vandalism, and Public Communications 6426 Jason challenges Garrett on his public communications, calling out his previous comments framing camera vandals as terrorists when they are primarily privacy activists. Garrett acknowledges making communication mistakes while pointing out the felony legal consequences of damaging municipal safety cameras.
Combatting Police Abuse with Automated Audit Assistance 6524 Jason questions what mechanisms prevent police officers from abusing ALPR data for personal stalking or corruption. Garrett details the new automated audit assistant feature that identifies suspicious search patterns, citing real-world terminations of offending officers.
Sponsor Message: Numeral Sales Tax Solution 0000 Mid-roll commercial break sponsor message for Numeral Sales Tax Solution.
Churn, Misinformation, and Ethical Competition 5412 Jason and Garrett discuss city cancellations, competitor tactics, and ethical lines in surveillance technology. Garrett clarifies that many cancellations stem from misinformation confusing Flock with facial-recognition competitors, and several cities subsequently reinstated Flock.
Vehicle Identification Technology and Socioeconomic Perspectives on Safety 6412 Jason and Garrett examine vehicle feature tagging (dents, roof racks) and delve into the socioeconomic divide regarding public safety, contrasting affluent neighborhoods with gated security against underprivileged communities that rely on municipal cameras.
Community Security Choices and Personal Safety Perspectives 4301 Jason articulates his parental perspective on accepting license plate tracking over 30 days while opposing facial recognition. Garrett shares an anecdote of an adversarial local politician whose perspective changed after being targeted by violence.
Navigating Public Scrutiny, Morale, and Executive Accountability 6513 Jason brings up public criticism, internal team morale, and media scrutiny like Tucker Carlson's critique, advising proactive transparency. Garrett introduces Flock's expanding drone business and explains how rooftop drones de-escalate 911 calls by rapidly assessing situations before armed police arrive.
State Surveillance Regulations and Interview Conclusion 4411 Jason and Garrett conclude by comparing state-level ALPR data retention regulations across the United States (from New Hampshire's 3-minute limit to Washington's 21 days). Jason wraps up emphasizing local community choice.

Statements from this episode (26)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Langley: Flock solved 1M crimes and found 10K missing people last year
“And if you look at like last year, to your point, we've had a tremendous impact on the country north of a million crimes solved using Flock, north of 10,000 people found who were missing.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 3:08
Assertion Supported
Langley: Flock Safety operates in over 6,000 US cities
“And so we're in, you know, roughly six, you know, just over 6000 or so cities across the country.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 3:57
Assertion Contradicted
Langley: The last local government tech company IPO was over 20 years ago
“The last company to go public that serviced local government It was over 20 years ago.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 6:03
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Langley: Flock attended nearly 10,000 city council meetings in the prior year
“And so I think last year we went to something close to 10,000 city council meetings as a business.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 6:31
Disclosure
Langley: Flock reduced default camera data retention from 30 to 7 days
“And so for the longest time, 30 days was our default. We've recently shifted that down to seven days.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 7:49
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Langley: 90% of crimes are solved within seven days of data retention
“We think 90% of crimes will get solved within seven days of data retention.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 8:42
Disclosure
Langley: Flock avoids facial recognition and video capture unlike competitors
“We don't do facial recognition. We don't capture video. We don't look inside the car. We don't even allow in our system to search for people for our licensing cameras. And that's in direct conflict with some of our biggest competitors who do all of the things …”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 12:20
Assertion Supported
Langley: Flock camera vandal in Midwest faces 15 to 20 years
“And I saw this individual who just got arrested in, I think it was either Ohio or Illinois. And Jason, he's facing like, 15 to 20 years in jail.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 15:14
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Langley: Demographic and wealth disparities directly determine perceived personal safety
“Today, depending on the color of your skin and your wealth level and your race, I'm sorry, and your sex determines how safe you feel. Women feel less safe than men. That's a fact. But minorities feel less safe than you and me. That's a fact. If you live in a l…”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 16:55
Assertion Partly supported
Langley: Nine Georgia police officers fired for abusing Flock system
“They're publicly saying, I fired nine officers today, which is the most severe offense in Georgia for abusing the system. They're out of my police department. I don't want them.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 21:31
Disclosure
Flock Safety makes audit assistance tool mandatory for police customers
“And so we now are requiring that as a mandatory, it's not even a default, it's a mandatory feature you have to have turned on.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 21:59
Assertion Partly supported
Langley: California recorded 7,000 state database abuses last year
“And you look at like California, you know, there was 7000 reported abuses of their state database last year.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 24:49
Insight
Langley: Tech providers must set strong policy defaults for police chiefs
“And that chief's relying on me to educate him on what I think is best. And so I do think the responsibility falls on us to give those strong defaults and then allow them to pivot against it. And still respect the democratic process, but focus on the defaults.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 27:04
Disclosure
Langley: Flock Safety will never build AI that defines suspicion
“Yeah, that I don't want to do. Like, I think we've been really consistent that we never want to be a company that defines suspicion. That's really dangerous.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 31:26
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Calacanis: Cities that dropped Flock will reconsider once guardrails are clear
“I predict as you explain this and you change the defaults and the audits get in place and the dirty cops get, you know, taken out of this, that you'll see some number of those cities, you know, and the city councils readdress this when things cool down a littl…”
Jason Calacanis Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 34:55
Assertion Open · timeframe Aug 2026
Langley: Close to 20 cities have turned Flock cameras back on
“We've had close to 20 cities already turned their cameras back on.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 36:40
Opinion
Langley: Reckless competitors lack audit tools and it will catch up
“And our competitors to your point, yes, they run more reckless. They run without these tools, without the scrutiny. And I think it's gonna catch up to them. It will catch up to them eventually.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 37:44
Assertion Supported
Langley: Flock enables vehicle queries by visual defects like missing hubcaps
“The detectives, they would go in and say, okay, show me all the cars in this 15 minute window that did not have a back right hubcap. And that's the beginning of an investigation, not the end of an investigation.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 38:53
Assertion Contradicted
Calacanis: Poorest NYC communities most favored stop-and-frisk policing
“The people in the poorest communities were the most in favor of stop, ask, and frisk.”
Jason Calacanis Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 41:30
Opinion
Langley: Flock Safety supporters are typically people without other security means
“It's worth looking at who is so against what we do and who is so for it. And it's typically people who don't have any other way to protect themselves. Who need this, right? Who want this.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 42:28
Assertion Partly supported
Langley: Anti-Flock Illinois Official Became Advocate After Flock Solved Shooting At Her Home
“I had this interesting conversation with an elected official in Illinois who was one of our largest antagonists, very anti-flock and really sad, really scary. She was the victim of political violence. Someone shot at her house, and the police used a flat camer…”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 44:39
Opinion
Langley: Internal Morale Suffered the Biggest Damage From Flock's PR Crisis
“You know, I think the biggest damage is the internal morale, right?”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 46:09
Disclosure
Langley: Flock Safety raised capital and sits at 0.1% churn
“You know, we raised more money at the beginning of the year. Companies still growing. We could be growing faster. If we used to have zero churn, now we have to your .1%.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 46:58
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Langley: LPR is under 50% of Flock's revenue as drones grow fastest
“So drones is probably our fastest growing business unit right now. You know, our LPR business is just under 50% kind of our forward looking revenue.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 49:42
Assertion Supported
Langley: Zero federal regulation exists for police drone deployments outside air safety
“There's very little state regulation. There's zero federal regulation outside of air safety, which is important, but nothing yet.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 54:16
Assertion Supported
Langley: New Hampshire Mandates Three-Minute Limit on ALPR Data Retention
“So you've got New Hampshire at three minutes.”
Garrett Langley Aug 18, 2026 ▶ 54:35
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.