Mar 11, 2023 · 1h 29m · allin

E119: Silicon Valley Bank implodes: startup extinction event, contagion risk, culpability, and more

David Friedberg · 23m spoken David Sacks · 22m spoken Chamath Palihapitiya · 17m spoken Jason Calacanis · 16m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this emergency episode of the All-In Podcast, hosts Jason Calacanis, Chamath Palihapitiya, David Sacks, and David Friedberg break down the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), dissecting its root financial causes, systemic threats to tech startups, regulatory failures, and the critical need for emergency government deposit guarantees to prevent widespread banking contagion.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The hosts hold 99.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 8.1 Guest teaching 3.6 Guest disagreement 3.8 The hosts pushing back 4.3
05100:0020:0040:001:00:001:20:000:46–16:36 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Emergency Podcast Announcement and Banter David Friedberg delivers a structured technical breakdown of SVB's balance sheet, contrasting customer deposit liabilities with longer-duration assets like available-for-sale treasuries and hold-to-maturity securities. Chamath Palihapitiya briefly interjects to clarify that SVB primarily bought mortgage-backed securities rather than pure treasuries.16:36–23:54 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Assigning Culpability: Founders, SVB, and Regulators Chamath systematically categorizes responsibility into three distinct buckets: venture capital governance failures, SVB executive duration-mismatch miscalculations, and regulatory accounting loopholes. David Sacks builds on this by identifying the specific accounting loophole that allowed banks to avoid marking ten-year bonds to market.23:54–29:24 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Venture Debt Risks and Governance Breakdown David Sacks and David Friedberg clash sharply over venture debt. Friedberg defends the asset class based on historical 18 percent industry returns, while Sacks pushes back forcefully, arguing that past performance was inflated by a bull market and that funding creditless startups using customer deposits creates severe systemic risk.29:24–34:57 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Risk Management Debate and Regulatory Negligence Sacks rejects Friedberg's defense of bank balance sheet laddering, explicitly comparing SVB's financial engineering to Long-Term Capital Management and Enron. Sacks also criticizes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for failing to foresee systemic risks stemming from rapid rate hikes.34:57–52:47 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Mechanics of the Bank Run and Startup Impact The hosts examine how frozen sweep accounts and receivership mechanics threaten routine operational functions like payroll across thousands of tech and non-tech businesses. Chamath and Jason Calacanis debate potential government interventions, including whether public backstops should include taxpayer equity warrants.52:47–1:13:28 · The hosts as informed peer 9/10 Game Theory of Bank Runs and Market Reaction Sacks outlines the game theory of bank runs, arguing that moving deposits out of regional banks to top-four institutions represents a rational actor response rather than irrational panic. The group analyzes breaking regulatory findings showing a $42 billion single-day deposit withdrawal from SVB.1:13:28–1:17:26 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 VC SVB Exposure and Craft Ventures Case Study Chamath references SEC filings to reveal that nearly every major Silicon Valley VC firm maintained accounts at SVB. Sacks provides a case study of Craft Ventures, explaining how they successfully swept $45 million just before the freeze while scrambling to assist portfolio founders.1:17:26–1:24:54 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Regional Bank Contagion and Depositor Protection Friedberg and Sacks propose an emergency $500 billion backstop facility to restore confidence across regional banks without requiring active taxpayer expenditures. Sacks emphasizes the policy distinction between bailing out equity shareholders versus protecting business depositors.0:46–16:36 · Guest teaching 6/10 Emergency Podcast Announcement and Banter David Friedberg delivers a structured technical breakdown of SVB's balance sheet, contrasting customer deposit liabilities with longer-duration assets like available-for-sale treasuries and hold-to-maturity securities. Chamath Palihapitiya briefly interjects to clarify that SVB primarily bought mortgage-backed securities rather than pure treasuries.16:36–23:54 · Guest teaching 3/10 Assigning Culpability: Founders, SVB, and Regulators Chamath systematically categorizes responsibility into three distinct buckets: venture capital governance failures, SVB executive duration-mismatch miscalculations, and regulatory accounting loopholes. David Sacks builds on this by identifying the specific accounting loophole that allowed banks to avoid marking ten-year bonds to market.23:54–29:24 · Guest teaching 5/10 Venture Debt Risks and Governance Breakdown David Sacks and David Friedberg clash sharply over venture debt. Friedberg defends the asset class based on historical 18 percent industry returns, while Sacks pushes back forcefully, arguing that past performance was inflated by a bull market and that funding creditless startups using customer deposits creates severe systemic risk.29:24–34:57 · Guest teaching 4/10 Risk Management Debate and Regulatory Negligence Sacks rejects Friedberg's defense of bank balance sheet laddering, explicitly comparing SVB's financial engineering to Long-Term Capital Management and Enron. Sacks also criticizes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for failing to foresee systemic risks stemming from rapid rate hikes.34:57–52:47 · Guest teaching 3/10 Mechanics of the Bank Run and Startup Impact The hosts examine how frozen sweep accounts and receivership mechanics threaten routine operational functions like payroll across thousands of tech and non-tech businesses. Chamath and Jason Calacanis debate potential government interventions, including whether public backstops should include taxpayer equity warrants.52:47–1:13:28 · Guest teaching 4/10 Game Theory of Bank Runs and Market Reaction Sacks outlines the game theory of bank runs, arguing that moving deposits out of regional banks to top-four institutions represents a rational actor response rather than irrational panic. The group analyzes breaking regulatory findings showing a $42 billion single-day deposit withdrawal from SVB.1:13:28–1:17:26 · Guest teaching 2/10 VC SVB Exposure and Craft Ventures Case Study Chamath references SEC filings to reveal that nearly every major Silicon Valley VC firm maintained accounts at SVB. Sacks provides a case study of Craft Ventures, explaining how they successfully swept $45 million just before the freeze while scrambling to assist portfolio founders.1:17:26–1:24:54 · Guest teaching 2/10 Regional Bank Contagion and Depositor Protection Friedberg and Sacks propose an emergency $500 billion backstop facility to restore confidence across regional banks without requiring active taxpayer expenditures. Sacks emphasizes the policy distinction between bailing out equity shareholders versus protecting business depositors.0:46–16:36 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Emergency Podcast Announcement and Banter David Friedberg delivers a structured technical breakdown of SVB's balance sheet, contrasting customer deposit liabilities with longer-duration assets like available-for-sale treasuries and hold-to-maturity securities. Chamath Palihapitiya briefly interjects to clarify that SVB primarily bought mortgage-backed securities rather than pure treasuries.16:36–23:54 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Assigning Culpability: Founders, SVB, and Regulators Chamath systematically categorizes responsibility into three distinct buckets: venture capital governance failures, SVB executive duration-mismatch miscalculations, and regulatory accounting loopholes. David Sacks builds on this by identifying the specific accounting loophole that allowed banks to avoid marking ten-year bonds to market.23:54–29:24 · Guest disagreement 7/10 Venture Debt Risks and Governance Breakdown David Sacks and David Friedberg clash sharply over venture debt. Friedberg defends the asset class based on historical 18 percent industry returns, while Sacks pushes back forcefully, arguing that past performance was inflated by a bull market and that funding creditless startups using customer deposits creates severe systemic risk.29:24–34:57 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Risk Management Debate and Regulatory Negligence Sacks rejects Friedberg's defense of bank balance sheet laddering, explicitly comparing SVB's financial engineering to Long-Term Capital Management and Enron. Sacks also criticizes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for failing to foresee systemic risks stemming from rapid rate hikes.34:57–52:47 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Mechanics of the Bank Run and Startup Impact The hosts examine how frozen sweep accounts and receivership mechanics threaten routine operational functions like payroll across thousands of tech and non-tech businesses. Chamath and Jason Calacanis debate potential government interventions, including whether public backstops should include taxpayer equity warrants.52:47–1:13:28 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Game Theory of Bank Runs and Market Reaction Sacks outlines the game theory of bank runs, arguing that moving deposits out of regional banks to top-four institutions represents a rational actor response rather than irrational panic. The group analyzes breaking regulatory findings showing a $42 billion single-day deposit withdrawal from SVB.1:13:28–1:17:26 · Guest disagreement 2/10 VC SVB Exposure and Craft Ventures Case Study Chamath references SEC filings to reveal that nearly every major Silicon Valley VC firm maintained accounts at SVB. Sacks provides a case study of Craft Ventures, explaining how they successfully swept $45 million just before the freeze while scrambling to assist portfolio founders.1:17:26–1:24:54 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Regional Bank Contagion and Depositor Protection Friedberg and Sacks propose an emergency $500 billion backstop facility to restore confidence across regional banks without requiring active taxpayer expenditures. Sacks emphasizes the policy distinction between bailing out equity shareholders versus protecting business depositors.0:46–16:36 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Emergency Podcast Announcement and Banter David Friedberg delivers a structured technical breakdown of SVB's balance sheet, contrasting customer deposit liabilities with longer-duration assets like available-for-sale treasuries and hold-to-maturity securities. Chamath Palihapitiya briefly interjects to clarify that SVB primarily bought mortgage-backed securities rather than pure treasuries.16:36–23:54 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Assigning Culpability: Founders, SVB, and Regulators Chamath systematically categorizes responsibility into three distinct buckets: venture capital governance failures, SVB executive duration-mismatch miscalculations, and regulatory accounting loopholes. David Sacks builds on this by identifying the specific accounting loophole that allowed banks to avoid marking ten-year bonds to market.23:54–29:24 · The hosts pushing back 7/10 Venture Debt Risks and Governance Breakdown David Sacks and David Friedberg clash sharply over venture debt. Friedberg defends the asset class based on historical 18 percent industry returns, while Sacks pushes back forcefully, arguing that past performance was inflated by a bull market and that funding creditless startups using customer deposits creates severe systemic risk.29:24–34:57 · The hosts pushing back 7/10 Risk Management Debate and Regulatory Negligence Sacks rejects Friedberg's defense of bank balance sheet laddering, explicitly comparing SVB's financial engineering to Long-Term Capital Management and Enron. Sacks also criticizes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for failing to foresee systemic risks stemming from rapid rate hikes.34:57–52:47 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Mechanics of the Bank Run and Startup Impact The hosts examine how frozen sweep accounts and receivership mechanics threaten routine operational functions like payroll across thousands of tech and non-tech businesses. Chamath and Jason Calacanis debate potential government interventions, including whether public backstops should include taxpayer equity warrants.52:47–1:13:28 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Game Theory of Bank Runs and Market Reaction Sacks outlines the game theory of bank runs, arguing that moving deposits out of regional banks to top-four institutions represents a rational actor response rather than irrational panic. The group analyzes breaking regulatory findings showing a $42 billion single-day deposit withdrawal from SVB.1:13:28–1:17:26 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 VC SVB Exposure and Craft Ventures Case Study Chamath references SEC filings to reveal that nearly every major Silicon Valley VC firm maintained accounts at SVB. Sacks provides a case study of Craft Ventures, explaining how they successfully swept $45 million just before the freeze while scrambling to assist portfolio founders.1:17:26–1:24:54 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Regional Bank Contagion and Depositor Protection Friedberg and Sacks propose an emergency $500 billion backstop facility to restore confidence across regional banks without requiring active taxpayer expenditures. Sacks emphasizes the policy distinction between bailing out equity shareholders versus protecting business depositors.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 97.3% · guest 2.7%0:00 · the hosts 97.3% · guest 2.7%3:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%3:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%6:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%6:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%9:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%9:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%15:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%15:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%21:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%21:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%24:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%24:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%27:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%27:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%30:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%30:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%33:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%33:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%36:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%36:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%39:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%39:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%42:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%42:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%45:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%45:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%48:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%48:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%51:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%51:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%54:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%54:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%57:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%57:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:00:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:00:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:03:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:03:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:06:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:06:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:09:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%1:09:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%1:12:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:12:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:15:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:15:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:21:00 · the hosts 99.7% · guest 0.3%1:21:00 · the hosts 99.7% · guest 0.3%1:24:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:24:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:27:00 · the hosts 92.6% · guest 7.4%1:27:00 · the hosts 92.6% · guest 7.4%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 25:01 Sacks interrupts Friedberg on venture debt

Sacks aggressively rejects Friedberg's defense of venture debt, interrupting him with 'There is no commitment!' and insisting that using customer deposits to fund startup loans creates systemic failure.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 32:03 Sacks refuses Friedberg's financial engineering framing

Sacks flatly refuses Friedberg's narrative about portfolio laddering, calling it Enron and LTCM style financial engineering that relies on illiquid assets and un-marked bond losses.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 9:00 Friedberg breaks down SVB's financial balance sheet

Friedberg educates the panel on SVB's balance sheet mechanics, explaining how long-duration bond devaluations relative to immediate deposit liabilities caused the insolvency.

The host holds their own ▶ 52:47 Sacks details $620B unrealized bank loss statistics and game theory

Sacks demonstrates deep domain knowledge by citing Wall Street Journal figures on $620 billion in unrealized bank treasury losses to articulate the broader regional bank contagion threat.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Emergency Podcast Announcement and Banter 8622 David Friedberg delivers a structured technical breakdown of SVB's balance sheet, contrasting customer deposit liabilities with longer-duration assets like available-for-sale treasuries and hold-to-maturity securities. Chamath Palihapitiya briefly interjects to clarify that SVB primarily bought mortgage-backed securities rather than pure treasuries.
Assigning Culpability: Founders, SVB, and Regulators 8323 Chamath systematically categorizes responsibility into three distinct buckets: venture capital governance failures, SVB executive duration-mismatch miscalculations, and regulatory accounting loopholes. David Sacks builds on this by identifying the specific accounting loophole that allowed banks to avoid marking ten-year bonds to market.
Venture Debt Risks and Governance Breakdown 8577 David Sacks and David Friedberg clash sharply over venture debt. Friedberg defends the asset class based on historical 18 percent industry returns, while Sacks pushes back forcefully, arguing that past performance was inflated by a bull market and that funding creditless startups using customer deposits creates severe systemic risk.
Risk Management Debate and Regulatory Negligence 8467 Sacks rejects Friedberg's defense of bank balance sheet laddering, explicitly comparing SVB's financial engineering to Long-Term Capital Management and Enron. Sacks also criticizes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for failing to foresee systemic risks stemming from rapid rate hikes.
Mechanics of the Bank Run and Startup Impact 8334 The hosts examine how frozen sweep accounts and receivership mechanics threaten routine operational functions like payroll across thousands of tech and non-tech businesses. Chamath and Jason Calacanis debate potential government interventions, including whether public backstops should include taxpayer equity warrants.
Game Theory of Bank Runs and Market Reaction 9456 Sacks outlines the game theory of bank runs, arguing that moving deposits out of regional banks to top-four institutions represents a rational actor response rather than irrational panic. The group analyzes breaking regulatory findings showing a $42 billion single-day deposit withdrawal from SVB.
VC SVB Exposure and Craft Ventures Case Study 8222 Chamath references SEC filings to reveal that nearly every major Silicon Valley VC firm maintained accounts at SVB. Sacks provides a case study of Craft Ventures, explaining how they successfully swept $45 million just before the freeze while scrambling to assist portfolio founders.
Regional Bank Contagion and Depositor Protection 8233 Friedberg and Sacks propose an emergency $500 billion backstop facility to restore confidence across regional banks without requiring active taxpayer expenditures. Sacks emphasizes the policy distinction between bailing out equity shareholders versus protecting business depositors.

Statements from this episode (33)

Opinion
Sacks: SVB collapse is a Lehman-sized event for Silicon Valley
“This is basically a Lehman sized event for Silicon Valley.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 3:14
Prediction Held up
Sacks: Fed inaction over weekend could spark regional bank runs
“Unless the Fed steps in here over the weekend, we're going to see potentially a run on the regional banking system, a Cascade like we saw in 2008.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 5:42
Assertion Supported
Calacanis: Silicon Valley Bank serves 50% of venture-backed startups
“Silicon Valley Bank is used by 50% of venture backed startups.”
Jason Calacanis Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 6:02
Assertion Supported
Friedberg: SVB had $195B in total liabilities at end of 2022
“In total, Silicon Valley Bank at the end of the year had about one hundred and ninety five billion dollars In liabilities, one hundred and seventy three billion of customer deposits that they owe to customers and twenty two billion of other debt.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 9:35
Assertion Supported
Friedberg: SVB warrant profits dropped from $560M in 2021 to $148M in 2022
“They made five hundred sixty million dollars in profit on their warrants that they had in their venture debt portfolio in 20, 21. That number collapsed to one 48 in 20, 22.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 15:42
Assertion Partly supported
Friedberg: Silicon Valley Bank had only $15 billion in true net book value
“They only had fifteen billion dollars of true net book value, which is the difference between their assets and their liabilities.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 16:08
Disclosure
Chamath: Social Capital required all portfolio companies to extend cash runway to mid-2025
“In our portfolio, my partners and I walked into every company and made them have at least enough money to get through mid- twenty-twenty-five, right?”
Chamath Palihapitiya Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 18:03
Assertion Partly supported
Sacks: 10% of SVB's portfolio was venture debt to creditless startups
“10% of their portfolio is basically being loaned out to startups who have no credit.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 23:17
Assertion Partly supported
Friedberg: Venture debt industry has typically generated 18% returns
“The asset as a, as an asset class, we can make fun of it all we want. It's actually performed pretty well. These guys have generated typically 18% as an industry.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 25:09
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Sacks: Venture debt asset class breaks when startup up-rounds stop
“I believe that the data for all these models is, is skewed because it assumes again, an environment in which companies keep raising up rounds. And as soon as you get into a crisis in which that breaks, then the whole asset class breaks.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 25:57
Assertion Partly supported
Chamath: Venture debt is sole private credit segment funded by customer deposits
“You can't use customer, customer deposits to do some CLO deal or to do like, you know, to back a PE play. These are all LP capital that goes towards that. This is the only sliver, as far as I know, where you take customer deposits to create very risky loans wr…”
Chamath Palihapitiya Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 26:48
Disclosure
Sacks: Craft Ventures instructed portfolio founders to cut burn in early 2022
“We started doing portfolio updates with our entire portfolio of founders in February last year saying this is a regime change. You gotta cut costs. We did another one in May. You can watch them both on YouTube. Okay. And we were telling founders, cut your burn…”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 28:06
Assertion Partly supported
Friedberg: Venture debt comprised only 10% of SVB's loan portfolio
“If you look at SVB's loan portfolio, 70% are really these asset-backed loans, which are 56% of the portfolio is like, you know, pre-payments on, on LP commitments, and then 14% is private banking loans, which is loans against, you know, public securities that …”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 29:52
Insight
Sacks: Deposit banks must hold fully liquid, mark-to-market assets
“If you're a deposit bank, you should be required to keep all of your assets in fully liquid securities that you mark to market every day.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 32:28
Assertion Supported
Friedberg: Rippling missed payroll cycle due to Silicon Valley Bank collapse
“Today it was announced that Rippling, one of those companies could not hit their payroll cycle today, because they had money tied up at Silicon Valley Bank.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 44:34
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Friedberg: Systemic bank runs will occur without immediate 100% deposit backstop
“If that money is not available to them within the first 48 or 72 hours of the end of this weekend, then we are going to have a real crisis on our hands, because then you will see a lot of people trying to move money away from any institution that stores their …”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 45:50
Assertion Partly supported
Calacanis: TARP cost over $400B and generated a $15B profit
“TARP was just over four hundred billion dollars. It actually returned a fifteen billion dollar profit to the American people.”
Jason Calacanis Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 48:00
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Calacanis: US government could profit by backstopping SVB depositors
“I guarantee you, the US government could get some warrants on those companies or warrants and ownership in Silicon Valley Bank and make at least 50 cents on the dollar, maybe even double, and that's the way this bailout should be structured, and it has to be d…”
Jason Calacanis Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 49:11
Assertion Partly supported
Sacks: US banks hold $620B in unrealized treasury losses
“So the Wall Street Journal right now is reporting that US banks have 620 Billion of unrealized losses just on treasuries.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 52:48
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Calacanis: SVB contagion will kill tens of thousands of jobs
“Tens of thousands of highly paid workers, and not just tech workers, are going to be out of jobs, and they don't have jobs waiting for them at Amazon, or Google to bail them out, and this is the start of a contagion, if it doesn't get stopped, I believe that.”
Jason Calacanis Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:00:00
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Sacks: SVB collapse will cause a 60-day deal-making freeze
“Jake, how you tweeted that you think this is gonna cause a sixty-day freeze in, in deal-making activity. I think that's more or less right.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:03:04
Disclosure
Calacanis: Four portfolio companies face payroll crisis due to SVB freeze
“I have three open deals right now that we're doing. I now have to figure out how to get those deals done. And I have four companies that are in this payroll situation in a major way.”
Jason Calacanis Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:03:30
Assertion Supported
Friedberg: SVB faced $42B in withdrawals against $40B in liquid assets
“Forty-two billion dollars of withdrawals is 25% of total deposits, but forty-two billion is greater than the fourteen billion of cash they had on hand, and the twenty-six billion of liquid securities that they had.”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:07:02
Insight
Sacks: Withdrawing funds during a bank run is completely rational game theory
“The downside of taking your funds out immediately is zero. And the upside is you might save a hundred percent of your money. So it's a rational decision when confidence is lost to take out your money.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:10:52
Assertion Partly supported
Chamath: SEC filings show every major Silicon Valley VC had SVB custody accounts
“It's every single major VC in Silicon Valley.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:13:36
Disclosure
Sacks: Craft Ventures swept $45M from SVB right before its collapse
“We had about forty-five million dollars that we were about to distribute to LPs. And I'm like, whoa, that's crazy. So we were able to sweep that to an account we used to make in-kind distributions.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:14:41
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sacks: Big players are actively withdrawing money from other regional banks
“Big players are withdrawing their money from other banks right now out of an abundance of caution.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:16:34
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Friedberg: A Fed deposit guarantee would stop banking panic without spending money
“If a federal agency comes in, if the Fed comes in and says, you know what, we are going to backstop all of these banks, and we are going to put five hundred billion dollars behind it, and we're going to guarantee that all these deposits are going to be made wh…”
David Friedberg Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:18:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Chamath: Even a traditional bank run cannot revive the crypto market
“Nothing can revive the crypto market as we're seeing today, even in a run on the bank, which is exactly what everybody was afraid of in a Bitcoin world. That thing is down.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:20:09
Insight
Sacks: Crypto is dumped first during financial panics because of high liquidity
“When people are panicking about the state of their finances and worried about getting access to their cash, The first thing they dump is crypto because it is very liquid.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:20:27
Assertion Partly supported
Sacks: QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley did not assault anyone on January 6
“He didn't assault anyone. He just wandered through the capital, apparently getting a tour from police officers who were just guiding him through it.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:26:02
Opinion
Sacks: Four-year sentence for QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley is excessive
“I think four years is kind of excessive, and I think the reason why the guy got four years is because of his mental illness, he's not able to defend himself the way that he should be.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:26:56
Opinion
Sacks: Non-violent Capitol trespassers should not face felony charges or jail
“People who just trespassed or wandered through who may not even have known they were trespassing. That, that, that's not jail time. That's not a felony.”
David Sacks Mar 11, 2023 ▶ 1:27:43
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.