Jul 4, 2024 · 1h 23m · allin

Hot Swap growing, donors revolt, President Kamala? SCOTUS breakdown: Immunity, Chevron, Censorship

Jason Calacanis · 23m spoken David Sacks · 21m spoken Chamath Palihapitiya · 14m spoken David Friedberg · 13m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In Episode 186 of the All-In Podcast, the hosts analyze the political fallout from Joe Biden's debate performance and prospective Democratic replacement candidates, culminating in breaking news of Biden's commitment to stay in the race. The panel also conducts an extensive legal analysis of recent landmark Supreme Court rulings on executive immunity, the Chevron doctrine, social media moderation, and judicial philosophy.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The hosts hold 99.4% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 6.0 Guest teaching 4.8 Guest disagreement 4.9 The hosts pushing back 4.5
05100:0020:0040:001:00:001:20:000:00–4:47 · The hosts as informed peer 1/10 Episode 186 Opening Banter and Host Check-Ins Light banter opening the show and reviewing logistical details for the upcoming All-In Summit. The dynamic is purely casual banter and organizational check-ins.4:47–13:02 · The hosts as informed peer 5/10 Prediction Markets, Biden's Crisis, and the Hot Swap Debate Jason proposes a rapid democratic primary speedrun prediction while citing prediction markets like Polymarket. Chamath and Sacks forcefully shut down the premise, calling it one of the dumbest predictions made on the pod.13:02–19:36 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Assessing Kamala Harris, Party Mechanics, and Outsider Alternatives Sacks lays out party mechanics, DNC delegate rules, and campaign finance restrictions regarding Kamala Harris and the $1B war chest. Friedberg debates an outsider scenario like Jamie Dimon or Bob Iger.19:36–34:36 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Geopolitical Risks, Media Accountability, and Democratic Party Strategy Sacks outlines geopolitical risks in Ukraine and brings up the 1996 Bob Dole precedent as strategy for the Democrats. Friedberg defends pitching outsider executives while Sacks dismisses it as wishcasting.35:11–44:27 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 SCOTUS Ruling on NetChoice and Social Media Content Moderation The panel analyzes NetChoice and First Amendment corporate speech protections alongside jawboning in Missouri v. Biden. Friedberg frames social media platforms as content creation businesses operating under terms of service.44:27–47:06 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Analysis of Supreme Court Non-Partisan Voting Patterns Chamath cites specific case data including Rahimi, Trump v. Anderson, and FDA pill access to prove SCOTUS rulings break across non-ideological lines. He directly educates listeners against the activist court narrative.47:06–55:22 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Overturning the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo Friedberg and Sacks offer deep structural critiques of Chevron doctrine and administrative agency expansion. Friedberg explains how bureaucratic agencies leverage Chevron to expand headcount and demand larger budgets.55:22–1:00:03 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 Debating SCOTUS Judicial Philosophy and Court Packing Proposals Sacks outlines a 3-3-3 court structure while Chamath mockingly rejects Jason's Axios Martin-Quinn chart as a subjective classifier drawn by a child. Jason defends the academic methodology.1:00:03–1:05:25 · The hosts as informed peer 4/10 SCOTUS Takes Up Texas Online Age Verification Case The panel discusses SCOTUS taking up online age verification and humorous market indicators like Rick's Cabaret stock. Friedberg posits an OnlyFans shift hypothesis for the strip club index decline.1:05:25–1:21:07 · The hosts as informed peer 8/10 Presidential Immunity Decision in Trump v. United States and Jan 6th Sacks provides an extensive legal breakdown of presidential immunity and the three-part test set by Roberts. Jason aggressively pushes back on Trump's Georgia phone call, pressuring Pence, and January 6th armed groups.0:00–4:47 · Guest teaching 1/10 Episode 186 Opening Banter and Host Check-Ins Light banter opening the show and reviewing logistical details for the upcoming All-In Summit. The dynamic is purely casual banter and organizational check-ins.4:47–13:02 · Guest teaching 6/10 Prediction Markets, Biden's Crisis, and the Hot Swap Debate Jason proposes a rapid democratic primary speedrun prediction while citing prediction markets like Polymarket. Chamath and Sacks forcefully shut down the premise, calling it one of the dumbest predictions made on the pod.13:02–19:36 · Guest teaching 6/10 Assessing Kamala Harris, Party Mechanics, and Outsider Alternatives Sacks lays out party mechanics, DNC delegate rules, and campaign finance restrictions regarding Kamala Harris and the $1B war chest. Friedberg debates an outsider scenario like Jamie Dimon or Bob Iger.19:36–34:36 · Guest teaching 5/10 Geopolitical Risks, Media Accountability, and Democratic Party Strategy Sacks outlines geopolitical risks in Ukraine and brings up the 1996 Bob Dole precedent as strategy for the Democrats. Friedberg defends pitching outsider executives while Sacks dismisses it as wishcasting.35:11–44:27 · Guest teaching 4/10 SCOTUS Ruling on NetChoice and Social Media Content Moderation The panel analyzes NetChoice and First Amendment corporate speech protections alongside jawboning in Missouri v. Biden. Friedberg frames social media platforms as content creation businesses operating under terms of service.44:27–47:06 · Guest teaching 6/10 Analysis of Supreme Court Non-Partisan Voting Patterns Chamath cites specific case data including Rahimi, Trump v. Anderson, and FDA pill access to prove SCOTUS rulings break across non-ideological lines. He directly educates listeners against the activist court narrative.47:06–55:22 · Guest teaching 6/10 Overturning the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo Friedberg and Sacks offer deep structural critiques of Chevron doctrine and administrative agency expansion. Friedberg explains how bureaucratic agencies leverage Chevron to expand headcount and demand larger budgets.55:22–1:00:03 · Guest teaching 5/10 Debating SCOTUS Judicial Philosophy and Court Packing Proposals Sacks outlines a 3-3-3 court structure while Chamath mockingly rejects Jason's Axios Martin-Quinn chart as a subjective classifier drawn by a child. Jason defends the academic methodology.1:00:03–1:05:25 · Guest teaching 3/10 SCOTUS Takes Up Texas Online Age Verification Case The panel discusses SCOTUS taking up online age verification and humorous market indicators like Rick's Cabaret stock. Friedberg posits an OnlyFans shift hypothesis for the strip club index decline.1:05:25–1:21:07 · Guest teaching 6/10 Presidential Immunity Decision in Trump v. United States and Jan 6th Sacks provides an extensive legal breakdown of presidential immunity and the three-part test set by Roberts. Jason aggressively pushes back on Trump's Georgia phone call, pressuring Pence, and January 6th armed groups.0:00–4:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Episode 186 Opening Banter and Host Check-Ins Light banter opening the show and reviewing logistical details for the upcoming All-In Summit. The dynamic is purely casual banter and organizational check-ins.4:47–13:02 · Guest disagreement 7/10 Prediction Markets, Biden's Crisis, and the Hot Swap Debate Jason proposes a rapid democratic primary speedrun prediction while citing prediction markets like Polymarket. Chamath and Sacks forcefully shut down the premise, calling it one of the dumbest predictions made on the pod.13:02–19:36 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Assessing Kamala Harris, Party Mechanics, and Outsider Alternatives Sacks lays out party mechanics, DNC delegate rules, and campaign finance restrictions regarding Kamala Harris and the $1B war chest. Friedberg debates an outsider scenario like Jamie Dimon or Bob Iger.19:36–34:36 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Geopolitical Risks, Media Accountability, and Democratic Party Strategy Sacks outlines geopolitical risks in Ukraine and brings up the 1996 Bob Dole precedent as strategy for the Democrats. Friedberg defends pitching outsider executives while Sacks dismisses it as wishcasting.35:11–44:27 · Guest disagreement 4/10 SCOTUS Ruling on NetChoice and Social Media Content Moderation The panel analyzes NetChoice and First Amendment corporate speech protections alongside jawboning in Missouri v. Biden. Friedberg frames social media platforms as content creation businesses operating under terms of service.44:27–47:06 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Analysis of Supreme Court Non-Partisan Voting Patterns Chamath cites specific case data including Rahimi, Trump v. Anderson, and FDA pill access to prove SCOTUS rulings break across non-ideological lines. He directly educates listeners against the activist court narrative.47:06–55:22 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Overturning the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo Friedberg and Sacks offer deep structural critiques of Chevron doctrine and administrative agency expansion. Friedberg explains how bureaucratic agencies leverage Chevron to expand headcount and demand larger budgets.55:22–1:00:03 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Debating SCOTUS Judicial Philosophy and Court Packing Proposals Sacks outlines a 3-3-3 court structure while Chamath mockingly rejects Jason's Axios Martin-Quinn chart as a subjective classifier drawn by a child. Jason defends the academic methodology.1:00:03–1:05:25 · Guest disagreement 3/10 SCOTUS Takes Up Texas Online Age Verification Case The panel discusses SCOTUS taking up online age verification and humorous market indicators like Rick's Cabaret stock. Friedberg posits an OnlyFans shift hypothesis for the strip club index decline.1:05:25–1:21:07 · Guest disagreement 7/10 Presidential Immunity Decision in Trump v. United States and Jan 6th Sacks provides an extensive legal breakdown of presidential immunity and the three-part test set by Roberts. Jason aggressively pushes back on Trump's Georgia phone call, pressuring Pence, and January 6th armed groups.0:00–4:47 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 Episode 186 Opening Banter and Host Check-Ins Light banter opening the show and reviewing logistical details for the upcoming All-In Summit. The dynamic is purely casual banter and organizational check-ins.4:47–13:02 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Prediction Markets, Biden's Crisis, and the Hot Swap Debate Jason proposes a rapid democratic primary speedrun prediction while citing prediction markets like Polymarket. Chamath and Sacks forcefully shut down the premise, calling it one of the dumbest predictions made on the pod.13:02–19:36 · The hosts pushing back 5/10 Assessing Kamala Harris, Party Mechanics, and Outsider Alternatives Sacks lays out party mechanics, DNC delegate rules, and campaign finance restrictions regarding Kamala Harris and the $1B war chest. Friedberg debates an outsider scenario like Jamie Dimon or Bob Iger.19:36–34:36 · The hosts pushing back 5/10 Geopolitical Risks, Media Accountability, and Democratic Party Strategy Sacks outlines geopolitical risks in Ukraine and brings up the 1996 Bob Dole precedent as strategy for the Democrats. Friedberg defends pitching outsider executives while Sacks dismisses it as wishcasting.35:11–44:27 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 SCOTUS Ruling on NetChoice and Social Media Content Moderation The panel analyzes NetChoice and First Amendment corporate speech protections alongside jawboning in Missouri v. Biden. Friedberg frames social media platforms as content creation businesses operating under terms of service.44:27–47:06 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Analysis of Supreme Court Non-Partisan Voting Patterns Chamath cites specific case data including Rahimi, Trump v. Anderson, and FDA pill access to prove SCOTUS rulings break across non-ideological lines. He directly educates listeners against the activist court narrative.47:06–55:22 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 Overturning the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo Friedberg and Sacks offer deep structural critiques of Chevron doctrine and administrative agency expansion. Friedberg explains how bureaucratic agencies leverage Chevron to expand headcount and demand larger budgets.55:22–1:00:03 · The hosts pushing back 6/10 Debating SCOTUS Judicial Philosophy and Court Packing Proposals Sacks outlines a 3-3-3 court structure while Chamath mockingly rejects Jason's Axios Martin-Quinn chart as a subjective classifier drawn by a child. Jason defends the academic methodology.1:00:03–1:05:25 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 SCOTUS Takes Up Texas Online Age Verification Case The panel discusses SCOTUS taking up online age verification and humorous market indicators like Rick's Cabaret stock. Friedberg posits an OnlyFans shift hypothesis for the strip club index decline.1:05:25–1:21:07 · The hosts pushing back 8/10 Presidential Immunity Decision in Trump v. United States and Jan 6th Sacks provides an extensive legal breakdown of presidential immunity and the three-part test set by Roberts. Jason aggressively pushes back on Trump's Georgia phone call, pressuring Pence, and January 6th armed groups.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 98.2% · guest 1.8%0:00 · the hosts 98.2% · guest 1.8%3:00 · the hosts 98.9% · guest 1.1%3:00 · the hosts 98.9% · guest 1.1%6:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%6:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%9:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%9:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%15:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%15:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%18:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%21:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%21:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%24:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%24:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%27:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%27:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%30:00 · the hosts 99.1% · guest 0.9%30:00 · the hosts 99.1% · guest 0.9%33:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%33:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%36:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%36:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%39:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%39:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%42:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%42:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%45:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%45:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%48:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%48:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%51:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%51:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%54:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%54:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%57:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%57:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:00:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:00:00 · the hosts 99.8% · guest 0.2%1:03:00 · the hosts 99.6% · guest 0.4%1:03:00 · the hosts 99.6% · guest 0.4%1:06:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:06:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:09:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:09:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:12:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:15:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:15:00 · the hosts 100% · guest 0%1:18:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%1:18:00 · the hosts 99.9% · guest 0.1%1:21:00 · the hosts 79.5% · guest 20.5%1:21:00 · the hosts 79.5% · guest 20.5%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 13:02 Chamath dismisses Jason's hot swap prediction

Chamath forcefully rejects Jason's primary speedrun idea, calling it one of the dumbest predictions Jason has ever made on the podcast.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 1:20:30 Jason refuses Sacks' framing on January 6th weapon caches

Jason repeatedly refuses to accept Sacks' minimizing of January 6th defendants, pointing out that groups like the Oath Keepers staged large caches of weapons in surrounding hotels.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 44:47 Chamath dismantles the partisan SCOTUS narrative with vote data

Chamath systematically lists recent SCOTUS case outcomes like Rahimi (8-1) and FDA (9-0) to correct the widespread media narrative that the court acts purely as a partisan conservative bloc.

The host holds their own ▶ 50:32 Friedberg details administrative agency expansion mechanics

Friedberg demonstrates clear domain expertise in government agency operations, explaining how Chevron allowed unelected regulators to continuously expand their authority and budgets.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Episode 186 Opening Banter and Host Check-Ins 1111 Light banter opening the show and reviewing logistical details for the upcoming All-In Summit. The dynamic is purely casual banter and organizational check-ins.
Prediction Markets, Biden's Crisis, and the Hot Swap Debate 5676 Jason proposes a rapid democratic primary speedrun prediction while citing prediction markets like Polymarket. Chamath and Sacks forcefully shut down the premise, calling it one of the dumbest predictions made on the pod.
Assessing Kamala Harris, Party Mechanics, and Outsider Alternatives 6665 Sacks lays out party mechanics, DNC delegate rules, and campaign finance restrictions regarding Kamala Harris and the $1B war chest. Friedberg debates an outsider scenario like Jamie Dimon or Bob Iger.
Geopolitical Risks, Media Accountability, and Democratic Party Strategy 6565 Sacks outlines geopolitical risks in Ukraine and brings up the 1996 Bob Dole precedent as strategy for the Democrats. Friedberg defends pitching outsider executives while Sacks dismisses it as wishcasting.
SCOTUS Ruling on NetChoice and Social Media Content Moderation 7444 The panel analyzes NetChoice and First Amendment corporate speech protections alongside jawboning in Missouri v. Biden. Friedberg frames social media platforms as content creation businesses operating under terms of service.
Analysis of Supreme Court Non-Partisan Voting Patterns 8653 Chamath cites specific case data including Rahimi, Trump v. Anderson, and FDA pill access to prove SCOTUS rulings break across non-ideological lines. He directly educates listeners against the activist court narrative.
Overturning the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo 8644 Friedberg and Sacks offer deep structural critiques of Chevron doctrine and administrative agency expansion. Friedberg explains how bureaucratic agencies leverage Chevron to expand headcount and demand larger budgets.
Debating SCOTUS Judicial Philosophy and Court Packing Proposals 7566 Sacks outlines a 3-3-3 court structure while Chamath mockingly rejects Jason's Axios Martin-Quinn chart as a subjective classifier drawn by a child. Jason defends the academic methodology.
SCOTUS Takes Up Texas Online Age Verification Case 4333 The panel discusses SCOTUS taking up online age verification and humorous market indicators like Rick's Cabaret stock. Friedberg posits an OnlyFans shift hypothesis for the strip club index decline.
Presidential Immunity Decision in Trump v. United States and Jan 6th 8678 Sacks provides an extensive legal breakdown of presidential immunity and the three-part test set by Roberts. Jason aggressively pushes back on Trump's Georgia phone call, pressuring Pence, and January 6th armed groups.

Statements from this episode (26)

Assertion Partly supported
Calacanis: Harris's nominee betting odds jumped from 18% to 50%
“VP Harris's chances of being the Democratic nominee have gone from 18% to 50%, the same time President Biden has dropped from 66% to 28%.”
Jason Calacanis Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 6:38
Assertion Partly supported
Chamath: Biden's campaign funds can only transfer to Harris
“You can only move it to Harris. You cannot move it. You cannot move the entire, entirety of that budget.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 10:51
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Calacanis: Democrats will hold a 10-week, five-debate primary speed run
“They're going to do a democratic primary speed run. Here's what's going to happen. They're going to do five debates in 10 weeks. And then, whoever wins, wins.”
Jason Calacanis Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 11:53
Prediction Held up
Sacks: Kamala Harris is the only candidate option if Biden exits
“We are gonna get President Kamala Harris. She's the only alternative.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 13:42
Assertion Contradicted
Sacks: Democrats must refund $1B if replacing both Biden and Harris
“They would lose roughly a billion dollars of contributions to the Biden-Harris campaign if neither Biden nor Harris is running at the top of the ticket. They'd have to refund all of that money back to the donors who contributed it.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 14:02
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Sacks: Democratic Party will never select an outsider presidential candidate
“They're never going to hand the reins of the party to a total outsider. The Democratic Party is the ultimate insider party, and they are going to pick an insider.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 18:25
Assertion Supported
Sacks claims American cluster bombs killed Russian civilians in Crimea
“American cluster bombs were used to kill Russian civilians sunbathing on the beach in Crimea.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 21:05
Assertion Contradicted
Chamath: Biden approved US private contractors fighting in Ukraine
“Biden actually approved Private contractors now going into Ukraine and starting to fight. Americans will be on the battlefield as of, I think this was just a few days ago.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 22:23
Assertion Contradicted
Chamath: Democrats must wrap up nominee replacement by mid-August
“How the electoral college works and how the ballot system works is that you don't have infinite time. You have to get all of this wrapped up and cinched up by the middle of August at the latest.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 24:53
Assertion Supported
Sacks: Biden administration pressured social media companies to remove user speech
“And basically what that case was about was the Biden administration was engaged in attempts To influence or pressure social media companies to take down speech. It's a practice known as jawboning.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 38:56
Insight
Friedberg: Social media platforms are editorial content companies, not public utilities
“At the end of the day, these are all, as I've shared in the past, my belief is they're all content companies. They have a choice as executives and its editors. Of those companies to decide how to editorialize the content on their platforms.”
David Friedberg Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 39:46
Opinion
Friedberg: Texas and Florida social media and meat laws limit innovation
“What else is striking is just how Insular and protectionist Texas and Florida are being, and it's not just with this law, it's also with the lab-grown meat or cultivated meat laws that they'passed, and other states are passing similar laws, which is limiting i…”
David Friedberg Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 42:41
Opinion
Chamath: Supreme Court decisions are unpredictable and not strictly ideological
“I think that the court's decisions are relatively unpredictable in the sense that it's not just a conservative block versus a liberal block.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 46:23
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Friedberg: Overturning Chevron will limit agency authority and bureaucratic overhead
“And I'm optimistic that this ruling will limit the agency's authorities and limit their ability to create more bureaucratic overhead.”
David Friedberg Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 52:09
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Friedberg: Ending Chevron deference will cause negative environmental and public health impacts
“There's a negative consequence that will arise to some degree with respect to health of the environment, health of people, etc.”
David Friedberg Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 52:45
Opinion
Sacks: Overturning Chevron offers a chance to restore American democracy
“Now I think by reversing it, you actually give a chance for the restoration of democracy.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 54:33
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sacks: US Supreme Court is structured as a three-three-three ideologically balanced bench
“It's a three, three, three court, meaning there's three conservatives, there's three liberals, and there's three justices in the middle. You have this middle block led by the Chief Justice Roberts with Kavanaugh and Barrett, and then you got the conservatives …”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 56:14
Opinion
Sacks: US Supreme Court is one of America's last functional institutions
“I think that the court right now is one of the last highly functional institutions in American public life and for Elected leaders to be calling for its destruction is just sad.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 57:00
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Sacks: Expanding Supreme Court seats will trigger escalating court-packing by Republicans
“You try to increase that to 13, then the next time the Republicans have control, they're going to increase it to 15 or 21 or whatever, and pretty soon we're going to have a hundred justices on the court.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 59:38
Assertion Supported
Calacanis: Some adult websites block entire states over age-verification laws
“I think a couple of these sites, because of the threat of, you know, this, these laws of age gating, they've just decided to wholesale leave certain states by IP address.”
Jason Calacanis Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:00:43
Assertion Contradicted
Chamath Palihapitiya: Rick's Cabaret stock price presaged the last two recessions
“What's interesting about the Rick's Cabaret stock price is that it has presaged the last two recessions.”
Chamath Palihapitiya Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:02:03
Opinion
Friedberg: OnlyFans disrupted strip clubs, rendering Rick's Cabaret index invalid
“The strip club industry has been decimated by OnlyFans. As a result, Rick's Cabaret is more likely down because of OnlyFans and the lack of Shall we say employee base available to work in these establishments because they make more money working online at Only…”
David Friedberg Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:02:49
Opinion
Sacks: Special Counsel Jack Smith should resign following Supreme Court rulings
“When you combine that judgment with this judgment, I think Jack Smith should just resign. It's pretty clear that Supreme Court has kicked the legs out from under his case.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:17:48
Assertion Supported
Sacks: DOJ heavily prosecuted hundreds of nonviolent January 6 participants
“They took hundreds of people who did not engage in any violence on January six. Many of them just wandered through an open door in the capital, and they were prosecuted to the hilt.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:18:39
Assertion Contradicted
David Sacks asserts no guns were present at the Capitol on January 6
“I'm just clarifying that there were no guns at the Capitol because that's a lie.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:20:48
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Sacks: Democrats are more likely than not to keep Biden on ticket
“Whoa. I think it's more likely than not that they're not going to replace Biden because the only feasible alternative is Harris and should be worse, and I think it's more dangerous for the country, frankly.”
David Sacks Jul 4, 2024 ▶ 1:21:21
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 460 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.