Minimum Viable Product
also referred to as: mvp
13 statements across 11 episodes · 6 bullish · 4 bearish · 8 people on the record · first statement Jun 21, 2017 by Michael Seibel · across every show →
Everything said about Minimum Viable Product, oldest first
Jun 21, 2017 negative
Sep 1, 2018 positive
Sep 5, 2018 positive
Seibel: Building an MVP in two weeks prevents problem and customer drift
“Typically, the longer it takes, the more you're going to have MVP and problem drift or customer drift. If you decide to only build your MVP in two weeks, it's a lot easier to stay on task and make sure actually solving that problem for that customer.”
Sep 5, 2018 positive
Aim for a 'minimum remarkable product' rather than a standard MVP
“I don't really like the word viable, because it's kind of insinuating that you're gonna put like the, like, just the least crappy thing you can out there. I much prefer the word remarkable. So minimum remarkable product. Ah, the product that is the least you c…”
Sep 8, 2018 positive
Jan 24, 2020
Seibel: Needing a polished MVP means incumbents are doing a good job
“If you can find a small population of people that have enough of a problem that the other folks aren't solving, that they're willing to use something that's pretty bad, that's a very good sign. If the only way you can find any group of users, even 10, even a h…”
Jan 24, 2020
Migicovsky: Startups should test hypotheses by layering MVPs on existing products
“One of the hacks that I like to use at this stage is to actually layer the MVP onto the existing product. So for example, if there's already some software that your users, not your users, like the people in the community are already using to track their compet…”
Jan 24, 2020 positive
Apr 20, 2022 negative
Dec 1, 2022
Feb 29, 2024 negative
Apr 22, 2026 positive