The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Steve Munford no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q So that begs the question, right? Why do a secondary, you could have maybe, I mean, you really need to have like one 21 40 in ARR to have a, you know, a good IPO these days, but why not IPO instead of doing a secondary with TCB?

A Yeah. I mean, absolutely. When, when you're the rule of, I think we're world one 20. So, so we are not a company that needed the money to fund operations. We're a profitable, high growth company. And an IPO. Yes, absolutely. That was, uh, we could have done that. Um, but I tell you, we, we, we see the opportunity to build a company that is, you know, really the platform for identity, which really it's a, it's a multi multi-billion dollar company. And the ability to, to listen, there's a lot of private capital available and the ability to operate a company, not under the scrutiny of a public market, not to be a sub, I don't know, subscale public market company. You got a lot more latitude to focus on the business versus focus on a lot of other investors. And it's a lot easier to run a company if you have a couple investors that share in your thesis and are working alongside you than to have all the overhead of running a public company. I've run a couple of public companies and, and it is very, very different than, you know, having one smart investor that wakes up every day and cares as much about your business as you do is very different than having, you know, 20 or 30 or 40 or thousands of public company investors.

AI assessment note: “ability to operate a company, not under the scrutiny of a public market”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.