The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Sebastian Charlin no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q No worries. Okay. That's interesting model. Very cool. Okay. So your CRO, tell me about the price increase. Everyone's always scared to increase prices. How'd you guys do it without pissing off, pissing off users?

A That was so hard, uh, since it was a first time and we had an increased price since 2016. First of all, And our costs were severely increasing, especially salaries, wages for developers. Um, so initially we wanted to do something like 10%, uh, since it was so long, but at the same time it didn't feel right because going through the hassle of communicating with everyone Um, so last summer we decided to do something a little steeper. We wanted to create like an asymmetrical advantage to go with our pro plan. We have two plans. One is the scheduling only. The other one is like a little more, you have scheduling plus time and attendance. Uh, your businesses, uh, retention rates are better there because you're using it more. So what we did is we increased the base plan by, um, um, and we increased the pro plan by Creating an asymmetrical advantage to switch to the pro plan, you know? Um, so that's, so the, the average increase is about. 26%. Well, if, if you, if you compound everything, depending on our customer split right now. Um, so overall we went for a big increase because it had been five years. It's, it hasn't been so bad. Uh, we sent a communication. We first call our, our larger customers. We gave four months of advance. A notice. And we also, um, said that anyone who would switch to an annual plan would lock up their price for one year. So that would delay furthermore, the…

AI assessment note: “We first call our, our larger customers. We gave four months of advance.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.