Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each
question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on
four things from 1 to 5:
directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow),
precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted
mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange
scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean.
Full method →
Oli Gardner no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone
Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5.
An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression.
The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the
cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only
toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.
Answered produced feed
D 4 · C 3 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.55
Q Yeah. And then if you look at, I mean, it looks like the way you guys are driving expansion revenue based off your features on the landing page are, are you drive people, uh, to increase ARPUs if they add more landing pages or overlays? Uh, is that correct? And if, if so, are there any other levers you're using utility wise that drive people into more paying you more?
A Yeah, that's the, that's the basics of it. Um, and you know, and just some more pro things, like if you're integrating with Salesforce and Marketo, you're a, you're a larger company, and you know, you're going to be having more use out of this product, so that we kind of get there, and also some features like dynamic text replacement, that actually might be across the board now, I think it is. Yeah, um, overlays, because they're so successful, And there's so much data and so much traffic, but yeah, so there's a limitation on how many you can have live at one time. Part of that's actually, you know, it's not necessarily our intention, but it's a good behavioral trait, especially if it's on one website, because you don't want those everywhere. That's not responsible use of technology. And the reason we call them overlays, they are pop-ups, but we call them overlays because we're trying to draw a line in the sand behind, you know, between the past when these things have been abused In terms of interaction and psychology, and we're trying to do it right, trying to be responsible with the technology because the technology is not the problem. We are.
AI assessment note: “Yeah, that's the, that's the basics of it. Um, and you know, and just some more pro things”
Answered produced feed
D 4 · C 3 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.55
Q Yeah. And then if you look at, I mean, it looks like the way you guys are driving expansion revenue based off your features on the landing page are, are you drive people, uh, to increase ARPUs if they add more landing pages or overlays? Uh, is that correct? And if, if so, are there any other levers you're using utility wise that drive people into more paying you more?
A Yeah, that's the, that's the basics of it. Um, and you know, and just some more pro things, like if you're integrating with Salesforce and Marketo, you're a, you're a larger company, and you know, you're going to be having more use out of this product, so that we kind of get there, and also some features like dynamic text replacement, that actually might be across the board now, I think it is. Yeah, um, overlays, because they're so successful, And there's so much data and so much traffic, but yeah, so there's a limitation on how many you can have live at one time. Part of that's actually, you know, it's not necessarily our intention, but it's a good behavioral trait, especially if it's on one website, because you don't want those everywhere. That's not responsible use of technology. And the reason we call them overlays, they are pop-ups, but we call them overlays because we're trying to draw a line in the sand behind, you know, between the past when these things have been abused In terms of interaction and psychology, and we're trying to do it right, trying to be responsible with the technology because the technology is not the problem. We are.
AI assessment note: “Yeah, that's the, that's the basics of it. Um, and you know, and just some more pro things”
