The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jake Moore no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 3 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.55

Q That's super cool. So, so you're, it's really a negotiate. I mean, you're, you're negotiating. It's not like, okay, number of paywall experiments, or number of downloads your app is getting, or are there any usage-based pricing axes you automatically sort of upgrade people against?

A Yeah, I mean, if it's self-serve, you can just Come in on the startup plan. It's usage based. Pay for what you, what you use. Um, usually huge customers, it doesn't scale well with them. Um, and so they want to deal. Um, and on top of that, we have so much industry knowledge. We run, you know, thousands of experiments per year. We've built We've built for our customers, you know, north of three to 4000 paywalls. I mean, I don't even know. I've never heard of such a thing. I don't know why anyone would even have done such a thing prior to this, but for people on the growth plan, we really like to take over their success in the first four weeks. So we, we jump in there, figure out everything that's going wrong, and we add in everything that we know has a chance at being right. Um, we always say we're not, we're not experts in success, but we've seen a lot of failed experiments Um, and you know, what we can do is tell you which experiments probably won't work. Um, but we don't know which ones will work. Um, so all we do is come in for the first four weeks, run all these experiments, um, for you, and then hopefully you, you see the power of the tool in that and stick around long-term.

AI assessment note: “if it's self-serve, you can just Come in on the startup plan. It's usage based.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.