The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Eric Berry no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q How did you tell me the story? How did you win the MSN homepage?

A Uh, that's a really good question. That's a lot of, a lot of effort. Um, so we've been talking to them forever. Um, and it just took years, uh, like actually years of working with them, uh, talking to them about the, the values of native, um, you know, MSN is one of the most sophisticated publishers that there is. And, uh, they look at why, why are they sophisticated? Well, because they make so much money and, uh, they have so much data. They have the full force of the Microsoft analytics teams, uh, which are very smart. And so they look at things like revenue per pixel, They look at retention. They look at all sorts of metrics. And so, uh, things around, um, ad formats that beyond simply what's the revenue per thousand impressions or whatever, but what's the aggregate impact on the lifetime value of a user? Uh, all of this is factored in and we were able to make a really strong case that native will outperform, um, traditional display and, And it's correct. And it bore out. And so they tested it and they have rigorous AB testing capabilities. Um, and so it's really through data.

AI assessment note: “we were able to make a really strong case that native will outperform”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.