The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Devin Wijesinghe no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 4.15

Q All right, Devin, take us, teach us some lessons about economics. So you're unique. Most companies kind of at this kind of monthly recurring revenue level, um, you know, there, there are poos, especially in SMB are like sub, you know, a hundred bucks, right? You have kind of less customers paying you way more. Do you have an inside sales team? How do you think about CAC and LTV?

A Yeah, so we do. So we have somewhat of a traditional and a traditional model. So target accounts that are, you know, given, uh, by not just industry, but ones we have specific verticals, uh, attached to. So whether it be CPG and auto and so forth that we have people go after. And then we also have, uh, an inside team that fields the inbound, um, and, you know, gets the, you know, kind of call to close, if you will, accounts. So CAC LTV, we're, we're always, um, You know, we're always investing if there's growth and CAC LTV makes less sense to worry too much about when you, if you're, you know, growing quickly, just because, um, you're going to continue to put money into, you know, Marketing and so on and so forth. So as we think about LTV, um, that's like one of these funny math numbers, right? So you can kind of say LTV is, oh, three years. Cause that's an average. But like that, you could just like put, you could say, oh, I'm worried about my CAC LTV and go bankrupt. Right? So we think about it as not just CAC LTV, but true CAC LTV against what our contract values are. Typically, you know, 12 months plus, you know, incorporating churn and, um, and then incorporating upsells into those. And then also, you know.

AI assessment note: “Yeah, so we do. So we have somewhat of a traditional and a traditional model.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.