The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Daniel Chait no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Round out the space for us when you use your, if you're going to compare yourself to others, who, I mean, who do you compare yourself to?

A Yeah. So, uh, you know, the, the recruiting software space, as you probably know, is incredibly crowded. There are literally hundreds to way too many, too many to, to measure. Uh, but you can think about it in different categories. Like if you think about kind of small customers under a hundred employees, that's where you have many of the kind of free software. People are using things like Asana and Google sheets, and they may upgrade to, um, a tool like a jazz or a workable, um, Um, in the sort of mid-market, um, I think in the tech world, especially companies like up to a thousand or 2000 employees, there was a lot of time where that was kind of Jobbytes territory, um, and we've seen a lot of movement from them in recent years, uh, and companies like iSIMS as well, and then at the enterprise, which has kind of, um, been traditionally dominated by a lot of the big ERP systems like Oracle and SAP, we're now seeing a lot of movement to, you know, newer companies like ourselves, Um, and, uh, you know, who's just over the, over the, uh, water here in New Jersey and a few other players like that. But like I said, the competition is extremely, uh, fragmented market. I think one of the things that we're going to do is try to sort of, um, raise the bar of, uh, of our industry and try to deliver a lot more value and kind of make it a more active and dynamic industry.

AI assessment note: “at the enterprise... we're now seeing a lot of movement to, you know, newer companies like ourselves”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.