Nov 14, 2018 · 20m · top-founders

1208 Will This $250m+ Valuation Company be DeFacto Security Rating Standard?

Alex Yampolskiy · 11m spoken Nathan Latka · 6m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this interview with Nathan Latka, SecurityScorecard co-founder and CEO Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy discusses scaling his cybersecurity ratings platform to over $25M in ARR and a $250M+ valuation. Yampolskiy details the company's non-intrusive scoring methodology, capital-efficient SaaS unit economics, venture funding journey, and long-term vision to create the global standard for third-party cyber risk.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 36.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 5.5 Guest teaching 2.5 Guest disagreement 2.0 Nathan pushing back 4.8
05100:0010:0020:004:48–8:25 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Customer Scale, Revenue Expansion, and Engineering Focus Nathan rigorously tests Yampolskiy's top-line ARR calculations against customer count and average contract value. When Yampolskiy discusses churn, Nathan quickly intervenes to clarify gross logo churn versus net revenue retention.8:25–11:49 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Unit Economics, Inherent Network Effects, and Marketing Investments Nathan probes on customer acquisition payback periods and deduces allowable CAC based on ACV. Yampolskiy deflects exact payback figures slightly before settling on under a year and detailing event marketing expenditures.11:51–15:24 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Founding Inspiration, Venture Funding, and $250M+ Valuation Nathan inspects fundraising rounds and valuation before catching a logical contradiction when Yampolskiy claims venture money is untouched while simultaneously stating they are not cash flow positive. Nathan directly calls out the discrepancy, forcing Yampolskiy to qualify his statement.15:25–20:54 · Nathan as informed peer 3/10 Acquisition Philosophy and Vision for Standardized Cyber Metrics The conversation shifts to acquisition appetite where Yampolskiy shares his Henry Ford analogy on category creation. The interview transitions smoothly into the standard Famous Five rapid-fire questions without conflict.4:48–8:25 · Guest teaching 3/10 Customer Scale, Revenue Expansion, and Engineering Focus Nathan rigorously tests Yampolskiy's top-line ARR calculations against customer count and average contract value. When Yampolskiy discusses churn, Nathan quickly intervenes to clarify gross logo churn versus net revenue retention.8:25–11:49 · Guest teaching 2/10 Unit Economics, Inherent Network Effects, and Marketing Investments Nathan probes on customer acquisition payback periods and deduces allowable CAC based on ACV. Yampolskiy deflects exact payback figures slightly before settling on under a year and detailing event marketing expenditures.11:51–15:24 · Guest teaching 2/10 Founding Inspiration, Venture Funding, and $250M+ Valuation Nathan inspects fundraising rounds and valuation before catching a logical contradiction when Yampolskiy claims venture money is untouched while simultaneously stating they are not cash flow positive. Nathan directly calls out the discrepancy, forcing Yampolskiy to qualify his statement.15:25–20:54 · Guest teaching 3/10 Acquisition Philosophy and Vision for Standardized Cyber Metrics The conversation shifts to acquisition appetite where Yampolskiy shares his Henry Ford analogy on category creation. The interview transitions smoothly into the standard Famous Five rapid-fire questions without conflict.4:48–8:25 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Customer Scale, Revenue Expansion, and Engineering Focus Nathan rigorously tests Yampolskiy's top-line ARR calculations against customer count and average contract value. When Yampolskiy discusses churn, Nathan quickly intervenes to clarify gross logo churn versus net revenue retention.8:25–11:49 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Unit Economics, Inherent Network Effects, and Marketing Investments Nathan probes on customer acquisition payback periods and deduces allowable CAC based on ACV. Yampolskiy deflects exact payback figures slightly before settling on under a year and detailing event marketing expenditures.11:51–15:24 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Founding Inspiration, Venture Funding, and $250M+ Valuation Nathan inspects fundraising rounds and valuation before catching a logical contradiction when Yampolskiy claims venture money is untouched while simultaneously stating they are not cash flow positive. Nathan directly calls out the discrepancy, forcing Yampolskiy to qualify his statement.15:25–20:54 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Acquisition Philosophy and Vision for Standardized Cyber Metrics The conversation shifts to acquisition appetite where Yampolskiy shares his Henry Ford analogy on category creation. The interview transitions smoothly into the standard Famous Five rapid-fire questions without conflict.4:48–8:25 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Customer Scale, Revenue Expansion, and Engineering Focus Nathan rigorously tests Yampolskiy's top-line ARR calculations against customer count and average contract value. When Yampolskiy discusses churn, Nathan quickly intervenes to clarify gross logo churn versus net revenue retention.8:25–11:49 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Unit Economics, Inherent Network Effects, and Marketing Investments Nathan probes on customer acquisition payback periods and deduces allowable CAC based on ACV. Yampolskiy deflects exact payback figures slightly before settling on under a year and detailing event marketing expenditures.11:51–15:24 · Nathan pushing back 7/10 Founding Inspiration, Venture Funding, and $250M+ Valuation Nathan inspects fundraising rounds and valuation before catching a logical contradiction when Yampolskiy claims venture money is untouched while simultaneously stating they are not cash flow positive. Nathan directly calls out the discrepancy, forcing Yampolskiy to qualify his statement.15:25–20:54 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Acquisition Philosophy and Vision for Standardized Cyber Metrics The conversation shifts to acquisition appetite where Yampolskiy shares his Henry Ford analogy on category creation. The interview transitions smoothly into the standard Famous Five rapid-fire questions without conflict.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 74.6% · guest 25.4%0:00 · Nathan 74.6% · guest 25.4%3:00 · Nathan 26.6% · guest 73.4%3:00 · Nathan 26.6% · guest 73.4%6:00 · Nathan 21.9% · guest 78.1%6:00 · Nathan 21.9% · guest 78.1%9:00 · Nathan 63.7% · guest 36.3%9:00 · Nathan 63.7% · guest 36.3%12:00 · Nathan 16% · guest 84%12:00 · Nathan 16% · guest 84%15:00 · Nathan 17.4% · guest 82.6%15:00 · Nathan 17.4% · guest 82.6%18:00 · Nathan 32.7% · guest 67.3%18:00 · Nathan 32.7% · guest 67.3%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 14:41 Yampolskiy defends contradictory cash balance remarks

When challenged on whether the company is burning cash or sitting on all raised capital, Yampolskiy pushes back to clarify that he specifically meant the Series C capital rather than total historical funding.

Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 14:55 Nathan challenges conflicting financial statements

Nathan directly refuses Yampolskiy's claim, stating explicitly that you cannot claim all venture money remains in the bank while simultaneously admitting to being cash flow negative.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 6:38 Yampolskiy corrects churn calculation from gross to net

Yampolskiy corrects Nathan's assumption about churn by explaining that strong expansion upsells make their revenue retention net negative double digits.

Nathan holds their own ▶ 6:58 Nathan translates net negative churn to standard SaaS retention

Nathan demonstrates command of SaaS financial mechanics by immediately converting Yampolskiy's negative 15% churn jargon into a clear 115% net revenue retention figure.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Customer Scale, Revenue Expansion, and Engineering Focus 7326 Nathan rigorously tests Yampolskiy's top-line ARR calculations against customer count and average contract value. When Yampolskiy discusses churn, Nathan quickly intervenes to clarify gross logo churn versus net revenue retention.
Unit Economics, Inherent Network Effects, and Marketing Investments 5224 Nathan probes on customer acquisition payback periods and deduces allowable CAC based on ACV. Yampolskiy deflects exact payback figures slightly before settling on under a year and detailing event marketing expenditures.
Founding Inspiration, Venture Funding, and $250M+ Valuation 7237 Nathan inspects fundraising rounds and valuation before catching a logical contradiction when Yampolskiy claims venture money is untouched while simultaneously stating they are not cash flow positive. Nathan directly calls out the discrepancy, forcing Yampolskiy to qualify his statement.
Acquisition Philosophy and Vision for Standardized Cyber Metrics 3312 The conversation shifts to acquisition appetite where Yampolskiy shares his Henry Ford analogy on category creation. The interview transitions smoothly into the standard Famous Five rapid-fire questions without conflict.

Statements from this episode (10)

Disclosure
Yampolskiy: SecurityScorecard charges $2k per vendor, up to $1M per customer
“So on average, it's 2000 dollars per year to monitor a single company. So, but, you know, big companies have Tens of thousands of vendors. So some people are paying us a million bucks a year.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 4:00
Disclosure
SecurityScorecard ACV is around $80k to $100k per year
“Average contract value could be around 80 to a hundred K per year.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 4:13
Assertion Not checkable as stated
SecurityScorecard reaches over 450 enterprise customers
“So we have over a 450 customers and rapidly growing every single year.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 4:51
Prediction Not checkable as stated
SecurityScorecard projects $25M to $30M in ARR for the current year
“We're in the 25 to thirty million ARR this year.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 5:26
Assertion Not checkable as stated
SecurityScorecard maintains a Net Promoter Score in the 60s
“Our net promoter score is in the sixties.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 6:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Yampolskiy: SecurityScorecard's CAC payback period is under one year
“We're under a year.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 8:52
Disclosure
Yampolskiy: SecurityScorecard spends over $1M annually on events
“Yeah, we're spending more than a million.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 10:10
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Yampolskiy: SecurityScorecard enterprise LTV to CAC is over 3x
“We see in LTV to CAC over, over three, which is good in the enterprise space.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 11:58
Opinion
Yampolskiy claims SecurityScorecard's valuation should currently exceed $250M
“I mean, right now, given that we made more headway, we should be above that valuation right now.”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 14:16
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Elon Musk evaluates daily impact by reverse-engineering his schedule every evening
“He said to me, at the end of each day, he reverse engineers his day and says, how did I spend my time? Which meetings did I attend? Who did I speak to? Were there things I could have delegated? Were there things that I shouldn't have been doing?”
Alex Yampolskiy Nov 14, 2018 ▶ 17:42
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.