Apr 11, 2019 · 18m · top-founders
1356 Early Employee Who Wants to Sell A Few Shares? Plaza Ventures New Model Is What You Need.
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this interview, Nathan Latka speaks with Matthew Liebowitz, General Partner at Plaza Ventures, exploring how the Toronto-based firm pioneered Canada's first secondary tech fund and disrupted traditional venture capital with zero management fees, recurring fund structures, and targeted liquidity for early employees.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 43.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Matthew refuses to name which portfolio exit was most profitable, asserting NDA constraints and using humor to avoid Nathan's direct probing.
Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 5:43 Pushback on LP fund transparencyNathan directly challenges Matthew's value proposition by stating that regular VC funds already provide detailed monthly updates to LPs.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 10:49 Explaining off-balance sheet cap table cleanupsMatthew explains the structural difference between $40M–$200M institutional PE checks and Plaza's smaller $3M–$5M off-balance sheet secondaries designed to reward early garage-era employees.
Nathan holds their own ▶ 12:04 Nathan cites Infusionsoft Goldman liquidity caseNathan demonstrates industry expertise by referencing his detailed interview with Infusionsoft's CEO regarding employee liquidity tranches during their Goldman Sachs round.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Nathan as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Nathan pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book Promotion: How to Be a Capitalist Without Any Capital | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | The segment begins with Nathan promoting his book and show intro before welcoming Matthew. Nathan asks baseline exploratory questions about Plaza Ventures' origin and fee structure, which Matthew answers cooperatively. | |
| Differentiating the Fund Model and LP Transparency | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nathan challenges the claimed differentiation of LP transparency by citing his own experience as an LP in traditional funds. Matthew counters by emphasizing their zero management fee structure and immediate capital deployment. | |
| Creating Canada's First Secondary Market Fund | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | Nathan invokes Social Capital's private liquidity strategy to probe whether the model is flawed, but Matthew clarifies that Plaza targets pre-IPO secondary employee buyouts rather than delaying IPOs. | |
| Assisting Early Employees and Cleaning Cap Tables | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 | Nathan cites Infusionsoft's Goldman secondary round to question why founders wouldn't wait for large PE rounds. Matthew educates Nathan on off-balance sheet smaller checks and the unique scale of the Canadian tech ecosystem. | |
| Acquiring Employee Options and Partnering with CEOs | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Nathan identifies the tactic of purchasing unexercised employee options, noting aggressive US practices. Matthew clarifies they operate strictly in partnership with the CEO rather than going around management. | |
| The Famous Five Rapid-Fire Questions | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | The conversation concludes with the standard rapid-fire questions covering software tools, sleep schedules, and personal reflection in a relaxed, friendly tone. |