StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Sep 28, 2019 · 19m · top-founders

1526 With $60m in ARR, 1400 Employers, 18m Employees Use JellyVision for Understanding Employee Benefits

Amanda Lannart · 11m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Jellyvision CEO Amanda Lannart details how the company transformed from an interactive entertainment studio into a $60M ARR enterprise SaaS platform that serves 18 million employees. She outlines Jellyvision's self-funded growth, disciplined enterprise unit economics, and multi-product expansion across employee benefits decision support.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 33.6% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 5.2 Guest teaching 2.8 Guest disagreement 1.0 Nathan pushing back 2.5
05100:0010:000:00–2:40 · Nathan as informed peer 4/10 Episode Overview: Jellyvision's Scale and SaaS Metrics Nathan introduces the company metrics and asks foundational questions about Jellyvision's model versus full HRIS platforms like Gusto. Amanda explains the value proposition of benefits decision support and how the US healthcare setup uniquely fuels demand.2:40–6:02 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Enterprise Tiering and Per-Seat Annual Pricing Model Nathan asks about per-seat pricing and misinterprets the rate as monthly rather than annual, prompting Amanda to correct him. Amanda shares the transition from 90s CD-ROM gaming to enterprise B2B guidance.6:02–9:43 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Capitalization History, Secondary Offerings, and Team Scale Nathan drills into secondary liquidity mechanics and presses Amanda to separate gross revenue churn from net expansion. Amanda details tenure-based secondary qualification and sticky net positive retention.9:43–12:26 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Product Extension: Navigating Leaves of Absence Amanda details their leave of absence product extension and typical target customer size. Nathan computes deal sizes and payback dynamics using customer count and CAC ratios.12:26–16:04 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Profitability Trajectory and Implementation Gross Margins Nathan explores the difference between $60M ARR and GAAP recognized revenue along with average customer spend. Amanda explains how open enrollment creates a rigid annual sales and usage cycle.16:04–18:24 · Nathan as informed peer 4/10 Historical Growth Rates and Future Capital Strategy Nathan pushes Amanda for exact prior-year ARR numbers, but Amanda holds her ground, offering a 51% 5-year CAGR instead. The segment concludes with the rapid-fire Famous Five questions.0:00–2:40 · Guest teaching 3/10 Episode Overview: Jellyvision's Scale and SaaS Metrics Nathan introduces the company metrics and asks foundational questions about Jellyvision's model versus full HRIS platforms like Gusto. Amanda explains the value proposition of benefits decision support and how the US healthcare setup uniquely fuels demand.2:40–6:02 · Guest teaching 4/10 Enterprise Tiering and Per-Seat Annual Pricing Model Nathan asks about per-seat pricing and misinterprets the rate as monthly rather than annual, prompting Amanda to correct him. Amanda shares the transition from 90s CD-ROM gaming to enterprise B2B guidance.6:02–9:43 · Guest teaching 2/10 Capitalization History, Secondary Offerings, and Team Scale Nathan drills into secondary liquidity mechanics and presses Amanda to separate gross revenue churn from net expansion. Amanda details tenure-based secondary qualification and sticky net positive retention.9:43–12:26 · Guest teaching 2/10 Product Extension: Navigating Leaves of Absence Amanda details their leave of absence product extension and typical target customer size. Nathan computes deal sizes and payback dynamics using customer count and CAC ratios.12:26–16:04 · Guest teaching 3/10 Profitability Trajectory and Implementation Gross Margins Nathan explores the difference between $60M ARR and GAAP recognized revenue along with average customer spend. Amanda explains how open enrollment creates a rigid annual sales and usage cycle.16:04–18:24 · Guest teaching 3/10 Historical Growth Rates and Future Capital Strategy Nathan pushes Amanda for exact prior-year ARR numbers, but Amanda holds her ground, offering a 51% 5-year CAGR instead. The segment concludes with the rapid-fire Famous Five questions.0:00–2:40 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Episode Overview: Jellyvision's Scale and SaaS Metrics Nathan introduces the company metrics and asks foundational questions about Jellyvision's model versus full HRIS platforms like Gusto. Amanda explains the value proposition of benefits decision support and how the US healthcare setup uniquely fuels demand.2:40–6:02 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Enterprise Tiering and Per-Seat Annual Pricing Model Nathan asks about per-seat pricing and misinterprets the rate as monthly rather than annual, prompting Amanda to correct him. Amanda shares the transition from 90s CD-ROM gaming to enterprise B2B guidance.6:02–9:43 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Capitalization History, Secondary Offerings, and Team Scale Nathan drills into secondary liquidity mechanics and presses Amanda to separate gross revenue churn from net expansion. Amanda details tenure-based secondary qualification and sticky net positive retention.9:43–12:26 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Product Extension: Navigating Leaves of Absence Amanda details their leave of absence product extension and typical target customer size. Nathan computes deal sizes and payback dynamics using customer count and CAC ratios.12:26–16:04 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Profitability Trajectory and Implementation Gross Margins Nathan explores the difference between $60M ARR and GAAP recognized revenue along with average customer spend. Amanda explains how open enrollment creates a rigid annual sales and usage cycle.16:04–18:24 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Historical Growth Rates and Future Capital Strategy Nathan pushes Amanda for exact prior-year ARR numbers, but Amanda holds her ground, offering a 51% 5-year CAGR instead. The segment concludes with the rapid-fire Famous Five questions.0:00–2:40 · Nathan pushing back 1/10 Episode Overview: Jellyvision's Scale and SaaS Metrics Nathan introduces the company metrics and asks foundational questions about Jellyvision's model versus full HRIS platforms like Gusto. Amanda explains the value proposition of benefits decision support and how the US healthcare setup uniquely fuels demand.2:40–6:02 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Enterprise Tiering and Per-Seat Annual Pricing Model Nathan asks about per-seat pricing and misinterprets the rate as monthly rather than annual, prompting Amanda to correct him. Amanda shares the transition from 90s CD-ROM gaming to enterprise B2B guidance.6:02–9:43 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Capitalization History, Secondary Offerings, and Team Scale Nathan drills into secondary liquidity mechanics and presses Amanda to separate gross revenue churn from net expansion. Amanda details tenure-based secondary qualification and sticky net positive retention.9:43–12:26 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Product Extension: Navigating Leaves of Absence Amanda details their leave of absence product extension and typical target customer size. Nathan computes deal sizes and payback dynamics using customer count and CAC ratios.12:26–16:04 · Nathan pushing back 3/10 Profitability Trajectory and Implementation Gross Margins Nathan explores the difference between $60M ARR and GAAP recognized revenue along with average customer spend. Amanda explains how open enrollment creates a rigid annual sales and usage cycle.16:04–18:24 · Nathan pushing back 3/10 Historical Growth Rates and Future Capital Strategy Nathan pushes Amanda for exact prior-year ARR numbers, but Amanda holds her ground, offering a 51% 5-year CAGR instead. The segment concludes with the rapid-fire Famous Five questions.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 50.9% · guest 49.1%0:00 · Nathan 50.9% · guest 49.1%3:00 · Nathan 21.1% · guest 78.9%3:00 · Nathan 21.1% · guest 78.9%6:00 · Nathan 33.2% · guest 66.8%6:00 · Nathan 33.2% · guest 66.8%9:00 · Nathan 34.8% · guest 65.2%9:00 · Nathan 34.8% · guest 65.2%12:00 · Nathan 30.3% · guest 69.7%12:00 · Nathan 30.3% · guest 69.7%15:00 · Nathan 19.4% · guest 80.6%15:00 · Nathan 19.4% · guest 80.6%18:00 · Nathan 62.6% · guest 37.4%18:00 · Nathan 62.6% · guest 37.4%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 16:09 Refusing prior-year revenue breakdown

When Nathan presses for exact ARR numbers from 12 months prior, Amanda politely but firmly sets a boundary, telling him he can reverse engineer it from her 51% 5-year CAGR.

 Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 8:39 Nathan presses on gross versus net churn

Nathan interrupts Amanda's mention of net positive churn to demand the isolated gross retention number before accounting for expansion.

 Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:29 Explaining the enterprise ROI of benefits decision support

Amanda reframes Nathan's comparison to HRIS software by highlighting that massive enterprises spend more on healthcare than raw materials and employees need guidance navigating complex plans.

 Nathan holds their own ▶ 11:12 Nathan models enterprise deal economics and CAC

Nathan demonstrates financial acumen by instantaneously calculating year-one contract value, gross margin payback requirements, and customer acquisition budgets.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Episode Overview: Jellyvision's Scale and SaaS Metrics 4301 Nathan introduces the company metrics and asks foundational questions about Jellyvision's model versus full HRIS platforms like Gusto. Amanda explains the value proposition of benefits decision support and how the US healthcare setup uniquely fuels demand.
Enterprise Tiering and Per-Seat Annual Pricing Model 5412 Nathan asks about per-seat pricing and misinterprets the rate as monthly rather than annual, prompting Amanda to correct him. Amanda shares the transition from 90s CD-ROM gaming to enterprise B2B guidance.
Capitalization History, Secondary Offerings, and Team Scale 6214 Nathan drills into secondary liquidity mechanics and presses Amanda to separate gross revenue churn from net expansion. Amanda details tenure-based secondary qualification and sticky net positive retention.
Product Extension: Navigating Leaves of Absence 6202 Amanda details their leave of absence product extension and typical target customer size. Nathan computes deal sizes and payback dynamics using customer count and CAC ratios.
Profitability Trajectory and Implementation Gross Margins 6313 Nathan explores the difference between $60M ARR and GAAP recognized revenue along with average customer spend. Amanda explains how open enrollment creates a rigid annual sales and usage cycle.
Historical Growth Rates and Future Capital Strategy 4333 Nathan pushes Amanda for exact prior-year ARR numbers, but Amanda holds her ground, offering a 51% 5-year CAGR instead. The segment concludes with the rapid-fire Famous Five questions.

Statements from this episode (13)

Assertion Supported
Ford spends more per car on healthcare than on steel, Lannart says
“And the reality is Ford spends more money per car on health insurance than it does steel.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 1:52
Disclosure
Lannart: Jellyvision serves 1,400 customers representing 18M employees
“Total, we have 1400 customers that represent eighteen million employees.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 2:19
Disclosure
Jellyvision's enterprise deals range from five to seven figures
“It depends on the number of employees, but it can be a five, six, or seven figure deal depending on number of employees, and we work with the country's largest employers.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 2:51
Disclosure
Jellyvision charges between $0.25 and $18 per employee annually
“No, 18 per year. Per year. That's an annualized 18 per year, and it drops down to per you know, a quarter or less for very, very large employers.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 3:37
Disclosure
Jellyvision raised $27M total, but only $6.6M hit the balance sheet
“In total, we've raised a twenty seven million, but only 6.6 of it hit the balance sheet.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 6:07
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Series B investor Sigma Partners kept their chips in secondary round
“Our original, you know, our Series B investors, Sigma Partners, chose not to participate. They kept their chips on the table.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 6:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jellyvision maintains net positive dollar retention due to product stickiness
“It's a low digit net positive dollar churn. We've been very successful in having a sticky solution.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 8:15
Assertion Partly supported
Lannart: Jellyvision's growth is entirely organic aside from one tech acquisition
“We've done an acquisition, but it was purely strategic. We wanted to bolt on some technology that would allow us to optimize our pricing to be able to better offer a smarter algorithm. Everything else, all of our growth has been organic, nothing inorganic.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 9:30
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lannart: Leave of absence navigation is Jellyvision's most successful line extension
“And that is our most successful line extension by far. It really is sort of a mini business unit in and of itself.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 10:19
Disclosure
Jellyvision maintains an exceptional 11-to-1 LTV-to-CAC ratio
“Our CAC to LTV is about 11 to one.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 11:38
Disclosure
Jellyvision's gross margin payback period is 8.8 months
“Our gross margin payback period is 8.8.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 11:41
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jellyvision has been cash-flow positive since 2009 and remains profitable
“Have been since 2009. We are also profitable this year with line of sight to having substantially improved margins by 20 20.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 12:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Jellyvision surpasses $60M ARR and $50M in GAAP revenue
“Yeah, we're north of fifty million in in revenue. Our ARR is north of sixty million.”
Amanda Lannart Sep 28, 2019 ▶ 13:41
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more