Jan 2, 2021 · 29m · top-founders
Billd Construction Fintech Lends $100m to Subcontractors, Makes 12%+ Spread
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this interview with Nathan Latka, Billd founder and CEO Chris Doyle explains how the construction fintech company achieved a $100 million annual origination run rate by financing material purchases for subcontractors. Doyle breaks down the company's capital velocity, project-based underwriting, unit economics, and upcoming equity fundraising plans.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 30.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
When Latka asserts a 90-95% advance rate is already standardly high, Doyle firmly insists that strict covenant restrictions make flexible mezzanine capital essential.
Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 16:40 Latka challenges debt pricingLatka pushes back against Doyle's high cost of capital, arguing his proven loan tape should easily secure senior debt at 6-7%.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 17:40 Doyle breaks down senior vs mez debt tranchesDoyle educates Latka on the blended debt structure, clarifying that while senior capital is cheap, the mezzanine layer at mid-teens rates inflates the blended cost.
Nathan holds their own ▶ 12:22 Latka calculates capital velocity IRRLatka demonstrates sharp financial modeling on the fly, correctly calculating that 3x annual capital turnover elevates their 10-12% spread to a 40%+ IRR.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Nathan as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Nathan pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Doyle's Background and Billd's Inception | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Latka probes Doyle on his background and the business mechanics of Billd, equating their loan recycling model and usage-based monetization to SaaS platforms like Twilio and SendGrid. | |
| Subcontractor Scale and Vertical Underwriting Strategy | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Latka digs into the active borrower count and origination run rate, prompting Doyle to explain their vertical project-specific underwriting strategy rather than broad pre-approvals. | |
| Unit Economics and Project-Based Underwriting | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Latka constructs a roleplay hypothetical of a contractor purchasing a pallet of lumber to trace cash flow timelines, warehouse costs, and project-based underwriting. | |
| Net Spreads, Default Rates, and Pandemic Resilience | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Latka actively calculates annualized IRR returns based on capital recycling cycles, prompting Doyle to validate the spread and detail exceptionally low default rates compared to peers like Kabbage. | |
| Debt Capital Structure and Mezzanine Optimization | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Latka challenges Doyle on why his blended debt cost is not lower given the track record. Doyle explains the bifurcated senior and mezzanine facility mechanics. | |
| Invoice Audit Savings and Engineering Structure | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Doyle shares operational details about reviewing invoices for supplier billing mistakes and tax exemptions to pass savings to contractors, while outlining his engineering staff setup. | |
| Fundraising Strategy and Capital Efficiency | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Latka probes future fundraising targets, dilution expectations, and valuation, while pitching his own potential debt facilitation. Doyle maintains grounded valuation expectations. |