StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Jan 20, 2021 · 16m · top-founders

Collabogence Pivoting from $300k Agency, Raising $1.5m on $5m Pre?

Peter Smith · 8m spoken Nathan Latka · 5m spoken Frank Bien · 4s spoken Eric Yuan · 4s spoken Vivek Bhaskaran · 2s spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this interview, Nathan Latka speaks with Collabogence founder and CEO Peter Smith about pivoting an organizational analytics startup from bespoke workplace consulting into an enterprise SaaS platform. The conversation explores Collabogence's collaboration measurement algorithms, equity-compensated engineering team, single-client revenue concentration, and upcoming $1.5 million seed fundraising campaign.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 36.6% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 6.3 Guest teaching 2.8 Guest disagreement 2.8 Nathan pushing back 6.3
05100:0010:001:44–6:13 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Introducing Collabogence and Enterprise SaaS Pricing Model Latka methodically interrogates Collabogence's revenue and business model, exposing that their past $70k-$100k revenue was project-based consulting rather than recurring software subscriptions.6:13–8:47 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Team Composition, Engineering Structure, and Foundational Vision Latka checks the arithmetic on the founder's headcount figures before Smith articulates the core problem with corporate workplace transitions lacking baseline metrics.8:49–12:15 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Debating Collaboration Algorithms and Productivity Data Metrics Latka aggressively challenges the company's core value proposition, arguing that communication volume and reciprocity are flawed proxies for productivity, while Smith defends the algorithmic and psychological basis of his tool.12:15–14:40 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Fundraising Targets, Single-Client Reliance, and Equity Models Latka presses Smith on seeking a $5M-$7M valuation with single-client revenue concentration and probes how a pre-revenue firm retains six unpaid engineers through equity.1:44–6:13 · Guest teaching 2/10 Introducing Collabogence and Enterprise SaaS Pricing Model Latka methodically interrogates Collabogence's revenue and business model, exposing that their past $70k-$100k revenue was project-based consulting rather than recurring software subscriptions.6:13–8:47 · Guest teaching 3/10 Team Composition, Engineering Structure, and Foundational Vision Latka checks the arithmetic on the founder's headcount figures before Smith articulates the core problem with corporate workplace transitions lacking baseline metrics.8:49–12:15 · Guest teaching 4/10 Debating Collaboration Algorithms and Productivity Data Metrics Latka aggressively challenges the company's core value proposition, arguing that communication volume and reciprocity are flawed proxies for productivity, while Smith defends the algorithmic and psychological basis of his tool.12:15–14:40 · Guest teaching 2/10 Fundraising Targets, Single-Client Reliance, and Equity Models Latka presses Smith on seeking a $5M-$7M valuation with single-client revenue concentration and probes how a pre-revenue firm retains six unpaid engineers through equity.1:44–6:13 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Introducing Collabogence and Enterprise SaaS Pricing Model Latka methodically interrogates Collabogence's revenue and business model, exposing that their past $70k-$100k revenue was project-based consulting rather than recurring software subscriptions.6:13–8:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Team Composition, Engineering Structure, and Foundational Vision Latka checks the arithmetic on the founder's headcount figures before Smith articulates the core problem with corporate workplace transitions lacking baseline metrics.8:49–12:15 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Debating Collaboration Algorithms and Productivity Data Metrics Latka aggressively challenges the company's core value proposition, arguing that communication volume and reciprocity are flawed proxies for productivity, while Smith defends the algorithmic and psychological basis of his tool.12:15–14:40 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Fundraising Targets, Single-Client Reliance, and Equity Models Latka presses Smith on seeking a $5M-$7M valuation with single-client revenue concentration and probes how a pre-revenue firm retains six unpaid engineers through equity.1:44–6:13 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Introducing Collabogence and Enterprise SaaS Pricing Model Latka methodically interrogates Collabogence's revenue and business model, exposing that their past $70k-$100k revenue was project-based consulting rather than recurring software subscriptions.6:13–8:47 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Team Composition, Engineering Structure, and Foundational Vision Latka checks the arithmetic on the founder's headcount figures before Smith articulates the core problem with corporate workplace transitions lacking baseline metrics.8:49–12:15 · Nathan pushing back 8/10 Debating Collaboration Algorithms and Productivity Data Metrics Latka aggressively challenges the company's core value proposition, arguing that communication volume and reciprocity are flawed proxies for productivity, while Smith defends the algorithmic and psychological basis of his tool.12:15–14:40 · Nathan pushing back 7/10 Fundraising Targets, Single-Client Reliance, and Equity Models Latka presses Smith on seeking a $5M-$7M valuation with single-client revenue concentration and probes how a pre-revenue firm retains six unpaid engineers through equity.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 59.1% · guest 40.9%0:00 · Nathan 59.1% · guest 40.9%3:00 · Nathan 19.4% · guest 80.6%3:00 · Nathan 19.4% · guest 80.6%6:00 · Nathan 20.6% · guest 79.4%6:00 · Nathan 20.6% · guest 79.4%9:00 · Nathan 24.5% · guest 75.5%9:00 · Nathan 24.5% · guest 75.5%12:00 · Nathan 45.2% · guest 54.8%12:00 · Nathan 45.2% · guest 54.8%15:00 · Nathan 74.8% · guest 25.2%15:00 · Nathan 74.8% · guest 25.2%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 11:47 Smith defends algorithmic anomaly detection against dismissal

Smith firmly defends his methodology against Latka's skepticism, arguing that sudden spikes in communication volume followed by silence can quantitatively capture toxic relationships like workplace bullying.

 Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 10:52 Latka rejects communication volume as a productivity metric

Latka directly dismantles the founder's premise, asserting that high-frequency email traffic often signifies operational problems rather than genuine productivity or collaboration.

 Biggest teaching moment ▶ 8:25 Smith explains proxy metrics for knowledge-worker productivity

Smith educates Latka on why industrial-era output metrics fail for knowledge workers and why measuring directional changes in effectiveness is the only feasible benchmark.

 Nathan holds their own ▶ 5:43 Latka dismantles the 2018 SaaS claim

Latka rapidly identifies the contradiction between Smith claiming to have launched SaaS software in 2018 and admitting all revenue was actually one-off project consulting.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Introducing Collabogence and Enterprise SaaS Pricing Model 6226 Latka methodically interrogates Collabogence's revenue and business model, exposing that their past $70k-$100k revenue was project-based consulting rather than recurring software subscriptions.
Team Composition, Engineering Structure, and Foundational Vision 5314 Latka checks the arithmetic on the founder's headcount figures before Smith articulates the core problem with corporate workplace transitions lacking baseline metrics.
Debating Collaboration Algorithms and Productivity Data Metrics 7458 Latka aggressively challenges the company's core value proposition, arguing that communication volume and reciprocity are flawed proxies for productivity, while Smith defends the algorithmic and psychological basis of his tool.
Fundraising Targets, Single-Client Reliance, and Equity Models 7237 Latka presses Smith on seeking a $5M-$7M valuation with single-client revenue concentration and probes how a pre-revenue firm retains six unpaid engineers through equity.

Statements from this episode (9)

Disclosure
Peter Smith: Collabogence charges $2 to $5 per person per month
“So this is something that depends on the number of data sets that, or applications that data is pulled from, and the number of people that are used, but it typically ranges in anywhere in between two to five dollars per month per person.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 2:44
Disclosure
Peter Smith: Collabogence is negotiating $50k+ annual deals with enterprise clients
“We're talking to major banks pharmaceutical companies that are all looking at 50,000 plus per year.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 3:20
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Collabogence generated about $70,000 in revenue in 2018
“First year was about 70,000.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 4:51
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Collabogence projects close to $1M run rate by H2 2021
“We see that going up to probably a run rate of close to a million by the second half of this year.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 5:08
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Collabogence generated about $100K in total revenue in 2020
“For the whole year, it was about a hundred.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 5:38
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Collabogence measured a 30%+ collaboration gain after bank workspace reconfiguration
“So if you had a group of 500 people, what we actually saw was an increase of well over 30% Of that measure that we had. So there was a significant benefit of them sharing the space with each other.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 10:30
Disclosure
Collabogence plans mid-2021 fundraise after signing next clients
“We anticipate doing a raise by the middle of the year after we've signed the next three or four clients.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 12:22
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Smith: Collabogence had only one paying customer throughout 2019
“Oh, it would just be the one big bank that we've been working with.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 13:09
Disclosure
Smith: Collabogence is not paying salaries to its engineers
“No, at this point in time, we're not paying them.”
Peter Smith Jan 20, 2021 ▶ 14:10
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more