Apr 21, 2021 · 29m · top-founders

Pay Dividends To Investors Before Startup Founder Gets Any Pay?

Alaric Ong · 15m spoken Nathan Latka · 9m spoken Vivek Bhaskaran · 2s spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Nathan Latka interrogates entrepreneur Alaric Ong on his diverse venture portfolio, fiercely debating the ethics of multi-level marketing, early-stage business valuations, and whether startups should distribute investor dividends before paying founders a baseline salary.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 37.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 6.8 Guest teaching 2.0 Guest disagreement 4.8 Nathan pushing back 7.2
05100:0010:0020:000:15–5:43 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Nathan Latka's Subscription Call and Membership Offer Nathan probes Alaric on his first business in 2016, keeping the pace brisk by cutting through operational stories to focus on revenue, age, and equity splits.5:46–10:38 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Network Marketing Experience and the Ethics Debate Nathan intensely challenges the ethics of Alaric's MLM downline experience, noting that charging $400 to $13k when only 20 out of 140 made a single sale is inherently flawed.10:39–16:48 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Launching the Apollo Method Marketing Agency Nathan dissects Alaric's agency retainer figures and dismantles his claim of 'passive income' from equity stakes, pointing out the required active advisory work.16:49–23:01 · Nathan as informed peer 8/10 The $600K Tuition Business Valuation Debate Nathan attacks the $600K valuation of a tiny $2.5K/month tuition business, calling out the unsustainable founder deal where the owner receives no salary and is trapped if profit dips.23:02–28:42 · Nathan as informed peer 8/10 Scaling the Coaching Business vs. Startup Acquisitions Nathan bluntly tells Alaric that raising small checks at inflated valuations validates salesmanship rather than business value, urging him to focus solely on his high-margin coaching business.0:15–5:43 · Guest teaching 3/10 Nathan Latka's Subscription Call and Membership Offer Nathan probes Alaric on his first business in 2016, keeping the pace brisk by cutting through operational stories to focus on revenue, age, and equity splits.5:46–10:38 · Guest teaching 2/10 Network Marketing Experience and the Ethics Debate Nathan intensely challenges the ethics of Alaric's MLM downline experience, noting that charging $400 to $13k when only 20 out of 140 made a single sale is inherently flawed.10:39–16:48 · Guest teaching 2/10 Launching the Apollo Method Marketing Agency Nathan dissects Alaric's agency retainer figures and dismantles his claim of 'passive income' from equity stakes, pointing out the required active advisory work.16:49–23:01 · Guest teaching 2/10 The $600K Tuition Business Valuation Debate Nathan attacks the $600K valuation of a tiny $2.5K/month tuition business, calling out the unsustainable founder deal where the owner receives no salary and is trapped if profit dips.23:02–28:42 · Guest teaching 1/10 Scaling the Coaching Business vs. Startup Acquisitions Nathan bluntly tells Alaric that raising small checks at inflated valuations validates salesmanship rather than business value, urging him to focus solely on his high-margin coaching business.0:15–5:43 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Nathan Latka's Subscription Call and Membership Offer Nathan probes Alaric on his first business in 2016, keeping the pace brisk by cutting through operational stories to focus on revenue, age, and equity splits.5:46–10:38 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Network Marketing Experience and the Ethics Debate Nathan intensely challenges the ethics of Alaric's MLM downline experience, noting that charging $400 to $13k when only 20 out of 140 made a single sale is inherently flawed.10:39–16:48 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Launching the Apollo Method Marketing Agency Nathan dissects Alaric's agency retainer figures and dismantles his claim of 'passive income' from equity stakes, pointing out the required active advisory work.16:49–23:01 · Guest disagreement 7/10 The $600K Tuition Business Valuation Debate Nathan attacks the $600K valuation of a tiny $2.5K/month tuition business, calling out the unsustainable founder deal where the owner receives no salary and is trapped if profit dips.23:02–28:42 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Scaling the Coaching Business vs. Startup Acquisitions Nathan bluntly tells Alaric that raising small checks at inflated valuations validates salesmanship rather than business value, urging him to focus solely on his high-margin coaching business.0:15–5:43 · Nathan pushing back 4/10 Nathan Latka's Subscription Call and Membership Offer Nathan probes Alaric on his first business in 2016, keeping the pace brisk by cutting through operational stories to focus on revenue, age, and equity splits.5:46–10:38 · Nathan pushing back 8/10 Network Marketing Experience and the Ethics Debate Nathan intensely challenges the ethics of Alaric's MLM downline experience, noting that charging $400 to $13k when only 20 out of 140 made a single sale is inherently flawed.10:39–16:48 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Launching the Apollo Method Marketing Agency Nathan dissects Alaric's agency retainer figures and dismantles his claim of 'passive income' from equity stakes, pointing out the required active advisory work.16:49–23:01 · Nathan pushing back 9/10 The $600K Tuition Business Valuation Debate Nathan attacks the $600K valuation of a tiny $2.5K/month tuition business, calling out the unsustainable founder deal where the owner receives no salary and is trapped if profit dips.23:02–28:42 · Nathan pushing back 9/10 Scaling the Coaching Business vs. Startup Acquisitions Nathan bluntly tells Alaric that raising small checks at inflated valuations validates salesmanship rather than business value, urging him to focus solely on his high-margin coaching business.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 70.9% · guest 29.1%0:00 · Nathan 70.9% · guest 29.1%3:00 · Nathan 19.1% · guest 80.9%3:00 · Nathan 19.1% · guest 80.9%6:00 · Nathan 36.3% · guest 63.7%6:00 · Nathan 36.3% · guest 63.7%9:00 · Nathan 37.3% · guest 62.7%9:00 · Nathan 37.3% · guest 62.7%12:00 · Nathan 15.6% · guest 84.4%12:00 · Nathan 15.6% · guest 84.4%15:00 · Nathan 17.9% · guest 82.1%15:00 · Nathan 17.9% · guest 82.1%18:00 · Nathan 45% · guest 55%18:00 · Nathan 45% · guest 55%21:00 · Nathan 48.3% · guest 51.7%21:00 · Nathan 48.3% · guest 51.7%24:00 · Nathan 48.4% · guest 51.6%24:00 · Nathan 48.4% · guest 51.6%27:00 · Nathan 38.5% · guest 61.5%27:00 · Nathan 38.5% · guest 61.5%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 25:20 Alaric rejects the claim that his investors are suckers

Alaric forcefully rejects Nathan's assertion that he duped investors, arguing that they received dividend payouts and achieved a positive return.

Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 25:07 Nathan refuses the idea that fundraising validates valuation

Nathan refuses Alaric's premise that three people investing creates true company valuation, flatly stating it only validates sales ability.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 2:38 Alaric outlines his retail dividend yield pitch

Alaric details the exact 5% dividend yield pitch he used to convince individual retail investors to buy equity at a 20x multiple.

Nathan holds their own ▶ 22:13 Nathan breaks down founder governance failure

Nathan demonstrates sharp operational insight by showing how depriving a founder of base salary in favor of dividends forces them to quit when cash flow slows.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Nathan Latka's Subscription Call and Membership Offer 5324 Nathan probes Alaric on his first business in 2016, keeping the pace brisk by cutting through operational stories to focus on revenue, age, and equity splits.
Network Marketing Experience and the Ethics Debate 7258 Nathan intensely challenges the ethics of Alaric's MLM downline experience, noting that charging $400 to $13k when only 20 out of 140 made a single sale is inherently flawed.
Launching the Apollo Method Marketing Agency 6246 Nathan dissects Alaric's agency retainer figures and dismantles his claim of 'passive income' from equity stakes, pointing out the required active advisory work.
The $600K Tuition Business Valuation Debate 8279 Nathan attacks the $600K valuation of a tiny $2.5K/month tuition business, calling out the unsustainable founder deal where the owner receives no salary and is trapped if profit dips.
Scaling the Coaching Business vs. Startup Acquisitions 8169 Nathan bluntly tells Alaric that raising small checks at inflated valuations validates salesmanship rather than business value, urging him to focus solely on his high-margin coaching business.

Statements from this episode (7)

Insight
Ong: Business Challenges Have Always Been Operational, Never Sales or Marketing
“Like in my whole business career, I've never had a sales and marketing problem. It always is an operations problem for me.”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 2:39
Opinion
Ong: 2016 Startup Collapsed Over Inflexible Co-Founder Equity Split
“The main reason why the business didn't take off was because of the equity split, right? Yeah. So the business didn't work because the equity split, because one of my partners, he had to go for national service. And so he couldn't contribute to the business an…”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 5:11
Insight
Ong: MLM is ethical if products deliver value without recruiting
“That's how I decide whether a network marketing model is ethical or not. It's based on whether if they don't recruit other people, do they still get value from the product itself?”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 7:32
Disclosure
Ong: Raised $18K for 3% stake in tutoring business within three days
“Within three days, we raised 18,000 dollars for three percent of the company.”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 17:02
Disclosure
Ong: Investment contract binds founder's future ventures to current equity split
“In our agreement, I made it this way, like, we made it this way, and we agree on it this way, which we agree is fair, is that if, let's say, she leaves this business and she starts another business, then what's gonna happen is that she, like, she went to split…”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 22:31
Disclosure
Ong: Main goal of coaching program is finding acquisition targets
“My main plan on why I do coaching is so that I can find more businesses to acquire, yeah.”
Alaric Ong Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 23:57
Insight
Latka: Raising capital validates salesmanship, not the business idea
“Raising capital does not validate an idea. It means you're a good salesperson.”
Nathan Latka Apr 21, 2021 ▶ 25:05
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.