Dec 1, 2021 · 21m · top-founders
Myr POS SaaS For SMB's hits $1.2m ARR, Raised at $7.5m Valuation with 400 Customers
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
MYR POS founder David Nadirzdin joins Nathan Latka to discuss how his company evolved from a digital agency project into a specialized point-of-sale SaaS generating over $1.2M in ARR across 1,200 quick-service restaurant locations. He details their unit economics, multi-unit franchise expansion, and capital strategy combining equity fundraising, low-interest debt, and R&D subsidies.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 34% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
David directly counters Nathan's question about Toast and Square by categorizing Square purely as a payments company and Toast as mismatched full-service tech.
Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 14:01 Questioning heavy equity dilutionNathan directly challenges David's valuation math, confronting him on why he would willingly dilute his ownership from 70% down to under 58%.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:13 Explaining limited service unit economicsDavid educates Nathan on the fundamental operational difference between full-service upselling and limited-service throughput speed.
Nathan holds their own ▶ 18:45 Calling out Canadian SR&ED financing metricsNathan immediately identifies the Canadian R&D subsidy as SR&ED, quoting exact subsidy percentages and low BDC interest rates from previous deal experience.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Nathan as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Nathan pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defining Limited Service Restaurants and Market Opportunity | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Nathan asks for a definition of limited service restaurants, testing if it aligns with airport kiosks he encounters. David explains the key distinction between full-service upselling and rapid turnaround order maximization. | |
| Competing Against Legacy POS and Company Origins | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | Nathan challenges David on why massive players like Toast, Square, and Par cannot handle this use case. David clarifies that legacy POS systems were built for full-service table dining rather than McDonald's-style throughput. | |
| Subscription Pricing, GMV, and Payment Processing | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | Nathan presses on pricing specifics and pushes for precise figures on GMV flowing through devices. He also interrogates the decision to shut down a profitable $2.5M agency to pursue SaaS. | |
| Fundraising History, Cap Table, and Franchise Expansion | 7 | 3 | 2 | 6 | Nathan digs into the cap table, funding history, and monthly revenues. When David speaks about raising a Series A at a $20M pre-money valuation, Nathan pushes him on whether he really thinks he will achieve it. | |
| Founderpath Valuation Tool Sponsor Break | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Following the Founderpath sponsor break, Nathan challenges David on taking significant dilution by raising $5M on a $20M valuation. David justifies the move based on market timing and untapped franchise demand. | |
| Device Financing and Canadian Government R&D Subsidies | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Nathan demonstrates domain knowledge of Canadian SR&ED tax credits and BDC debt interest rates, matching David's operational context seamlessly before closing with the Famous Five. |