The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 8 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Yin: Existing land platforms are terrible; Terrascope is good enough
“In looking at some of these other land platforms, they are terrible. So I think on a relative basis, actually, I think what you have is, is good enough to stay ahead of those, at least for now.”
Hudson: A commercial competitor with worse tech could beat Terrascope
“I think you've got a lead, but I worry without tilting the energy of the company in that direction. Somebody more commercial with a less good product might come to market and beat you to the punch.”
Manus: Terrascope's real value is B2B data licensing, not consumer search
“I think licensing this to industries that are trying to assess these rural properties. From liabilities in terms of, for fire liabilities, right, for building road infrastructure, for urban planning, for, I mean, there are just so many different applications f…”
Conwell: After 18 months, Terrascope's founder still does not know his customer
“He didn't know how to sell it. He didn't know who he's selling it to. And having been doing this for a year and a half, that's a problem.”