Evan Thomas explains to investors why Guru Games wants to retain full creative control rather than simply licensing its software to established casino equipment makers.
“Innovation is so stagnant in the gaming industry, we would hate to give creative control, lose creative control to one of these big manufacturers, and then see them tarnish our game into something that we didn't want it to be in the first place.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Evan Thomas
Opinion
Thomas: Casinos worry about attracting younger gamers beyond baby boomers
“The zone works for the traditional baby boomer gamblers. That's the bread and butter, the casinos right now, but casinos are worried about how are they going to attract that new gambler? How are they going to attract that underserved gambler that doesn't curre…”
Thomas: Casino game developers take 50% to 80% revenue splits
“So typical deals look like a seventy-thirty or a sixty-forty split. Some can go as high as eighty-twenty, and some can go as low as fifty-fifty in terms of .”
Thomas: Guru Games pivots to mobile and social casinos over hardware
“We're working with a social casino company to get basically free-to-play versions of our games up on casinos, say, on, like, your phone or, like, on Facebook. So, like, that, it's really that online side that we really found a better for us, a better match for…”
This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.