Cameron McCord, CEO and founder of Nominal, discusses the limitations of AI integration in aerospace and defense hardware testing.
Prediction Not checkable as stated
McCord: Not enough defense program cuts for startups to win big programs
“When I look at the sort of overall budgetary picture, like there's just not, there's not a enough. Of these big program cuts, I think for all of the amazing new companies building out there to like really get the big program or record wins that they want over …”
Opinion
McCord: Traditional primes do things no defense startup can do
“The primes play a like really key role in national defense. They have resources, they have capabilities. They can do things frankly, that. You know, and say essentially no other startup can do. And so we need to treat them accordingly in that way.”
Opinion
McCord: Legacy Tools Like MATLAB and National Instruments Fail Modern Hardware Testing
“Scenario A, where you would use really old outdated software. Things like win plot people know, but a lot of MATLAB has used Python analysis, Python scripts, some of the national instruments, you know, tools, things like that to do modern test engineering. And…”
Opinion
McCord: Software tools like Datadog and Grafana fail hardware testing
“Or you know, have modern technologies that were generally built in a software only world with like no consideration for hardware limitations or constraints. And so you might have new technologies like people use Tableau, right? Or like Looker or Grafana or Dat…”
Insight
McCord: Every deployed vehicle and drone is fundamentally a test asset
“Every asset, every drone, every plane, every, ah, you know, ground vehicle, every UUV is a test asset. Fundamentally, it's generating, you know, telemetry sensor data logs, just like you would a hardware in the loop, you know, test stand, or a test cell, or a …”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
McCord: DoD is compressing hardware development lifecycles to 24 months
“The DoD is like shifting the way that it's thinking about a lot of these larger programs, trying to get away from 10, 12, 20 year program development life cycles. Like let's build the next exquisite, you know, bomber or exquisite plane or submarine. Right. Tho…”