The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Augustus Doricko no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 4 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 3.85

Q sorcery. Because of that, it seems like one of the biggest conflicts that you keep on facing is public perception. I mean, the, the Texas floods is, is one of the things, and you were dragged through the media, and you actually, I mean, you did a world-class job, and people commended you for that. Um, are you worried about public perception taking this down and ultimately helping China win?

A What I've been really relieved by and really grateful for is over the course of the last two weeks, um, people rightfully were skeptical. They rightfully had questions and concerns about a very consequential technology, weather modification and cloud seeding. But in going out to the public, transparently talking about our operations, transparently talking about the state of the technology and where it's been in the past, The overwhelming majority of people that we've spoken to either in public or in the government, um, have been extraordinarily favorable and open-minded towards us. Um, a lot of people actually came to me in DC this past week, uh, just off the street from Texas and otherwise. Um, and we got to pray together both for those affected in Texas. And also they were kind enough to do so for us, for our reputation sake and for our safety sakes. I think I mentioned Uh, in some other locations, um, and to you earlier that, uh, some people that were misinformed about what cloud seeding is, that believed it to be chemtrails, uh, made threats against. Me, my company, et cetera. We're safe now. We're taken care of. Um, so first of all, I think that the overwhelming majority of Americans have been open-minded and in favor of cloud seeding after hearing us out. This is true of government as well. Some members of the United States government seem to be interested in capitalizing…

AI assessment note: “the overwhelming majority of Americans have been open-minded and in favor of cloud seeding”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 160 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.