Jun 28, 2024 · 59m · sourcery
Mark Suster, Upfront Ventures: Investing in Space, Defense, & Exit Opportunities · Sourcery with Molly O'Shea
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Sourcery, host Molly O'Shea interviews Mark Suster, Managing Partner at Upfront Ventures, covering fund architecture, founder evaluation frameworks, non-consensus hard tech macro investments, and modern startup exit realities. Suster provides deep venture insights on space and defense technology, active board governance, and the evolution of tech valuation multiples.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Molly holds 13.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Molly as informed peer 3.2 Guest teaching 3.5 Guest disagreement 1.6 Molly pushing back 0.6
speaking balance: gold is Molly, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 57:15 Forceful Rejection of Genocide and Apartheid Narratives
Mark emphatically challenges conventional media and social commentary regarding Israel, aggressively pushing back against specific terminology with demographic figures.
Hardest push from Molly ▶ 35:35 Challenging Hardware CapEx IntensityMolly explicitly pushes back against Mark's bullishness on space and maritime sectors by citing their traditional capital intensity risks.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 40:18 Software Multiples Reality CheckMark breaks down historical multi-decade SaaS revenue multiples to educate the audience and debunk the notion that software multiples permanently justify extreme premiums.
Molly holds their own ▶ 20:45 Citing Carta Series A Graduation DropMolly brings fresh empirical data from Carta showing graduation rates cratering from 20-25% down to 13%, steering the strategic conversation with concrete metrics.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Molly as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Molly pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casual Greetings and Informal Office Snack Banter | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Molly opens with warm rapport from their time working together at Upfront and prompts Mark on fund management structure. Mark provides an extensive breakdown of Upfront's three fund strategies, deployment discipline, and the power law of venture returns. | |
| High-Conviction Seed Strategy and Board Commitment | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Molly inquires about deal concentration, fund size mechanics, and decision frameworks. Mark contrasts high-conviction, concentrated board-level investing with high-volume index-style seed funds. | |
| The Three Pillars of Investment Conviction at Upfront | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Molly asks for positive founder traits, leading Mark to detail Upfront's three pillars: PMF economics, founder-market fit, and founder-Upfront fit. | |
| The Barbell Strategy and Series A Graduation Dynamics | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Molly asks about the barbell strategy and introduces Carta report data showing the seed-to-Series A graduation rate dropped to 13%, demonstrating market knowledge. | |
| Board Governance and Active Partner Dynamics Beyond Cheerleading | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | Molly praises Upfront's integrity during events like the SVB crisis, and Mark distinguishes constructive board partnership from superficial cheerleader VC behavior. | |
| Founder Experience and the Unglamorous Realities of Being CEO | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Molly asks about lessons from Mark's founder career, and Mark reflects candidly on how lonely and unglamorous running a company is beneath the PR hype. | |
| Macro Investment Trends: Space, Defense, Maritime, and Deglobalization | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | Molly transitions to macro trends, prompting Mark to explain Upfront's thematic bets in space, defense, maritime shipping, and deglobalization informed by geopolitical books. | |
| Debunking Hardware Misconceptions and CapEx Intensity Risks | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | Molly directly challenges Mark on investing in traditionally capital-intensive hard tech sectors. Mark counters the hardware stigma by explaining milestone-based down payments and hardware subscription pull-through. | |
| Software vs. Hard Tech Valuation Multiples Demystified | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Molly asks how hard tech valuation multiples compare to SaaS. Mark demystifies the software multiple bubble, noting 20-year averages are 6x and current 20% growth trades at 4x. | |
| Navigating Exit Pathways: IPOs, Strategic M&A, and PE Activity | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | Molly prompts a discussion on changing exit routes and private equity consolidation. Mark explains why small-cap IPOs are broken due to lack of analyst coverage and why PE buyers are currently sidelined by private valuation lags. | |
| Lighthearted Banter on Changing Display Names and Personas | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | Molly teases Mark about changing his screen name and asks for book recommendations. Mark discusses industrial history, chip development, and delivers an impassioned historical context regarding Israel and the Middle East. |
Statements from this episode (21)
Suster: 25% of VC funds deployed their entire fund in 2021
“25% of all funds deployed their entire fund in twenty-twenty-one. 25%, one in four. The median time to deploy in twenty-twenty-one was 1.7 years, okay?”
Suster: Roughly six deals drive 80% of returns in a venture fund
“Empirically, about six deals in any fund drive 80% of the returns.”
Suster: Seed funds take 15 years to yield most profits
“A seed fund has a 10 to 12 year maturity, and it's really more like 15 years, and that's just the truth about venture capital. It takes longer for your fund to mature, and you might return your fund in year seven, eight, or nine, but you're yielding most of th…”
Suster: Most tech markets are winner-take-most with weak returns for third place
“Most markets are winner take most. Number one takes the majority. Number two takes the rest. And number three is a set of steak knives. And If you back three, four or five, you're just not going to make a lot of money. You need extreme success in the category.”
Suster: Series A/B capital grew 9x from 2010 to 2022
“The market for A and B between 2010 and 2022 went up by nine X. So nine times more capital in those markets than in any other sector of the market. And as a result, valuations went up like 300%.”
Mark Suster argues Series A is VC's most overvalued funding round
“And so I think that a round is the single most overvalued round in venture capital.”
Molly O'Shea says seed-to-Series A graduation rates hit record 13% low
“I actually just read a Carta report today. I don't know if you saw it, but the graduation rate from seed to Series A is now at an all-time low, and before it was like in a normal year, they'd say like, 20 to 25% graduation rate. Now it's at 13.”
Suster: A VC's job is to be a sparring partner, not the decider
“I view it as our job to like be a sparring partner and it's lonely being CEO. I was CEO twice is very lonely and you don't get a lot of advice. And when you get advice, most of it is not applicable. And so I view it as our job to have an opinion and to state t…”
Suster: Investor advice from non-operators is often not actionable
“You often get input from investors who have never done what you've done before. And so it's like, well, meaning smart people saying smart things, but it's not actionable.”
Mark Suster says VCs must time trends for five-year horizons
“So it's our job to invest in something that we believe is going to happen in five years and being correct. If it's going to happen in a year, you probably missed the trend and there's probably 10 other VCs that were investing four years ago. And if you invest …”
Mark Suster calls Anduril the most important private company besides SpaceX
“So you look recently at Anduril, probably the most important company In the private markets behind SpaceX.”
Suster: Hardware anchoring significantly increases consumer willingness to pay subscription fees
“If I tried to sell you a product on your iPhone, download it and pay 20 dollars a month, It's so hard to get someone to pay 20 dollars a month for anything on their iPhone. If I sell you a 200 dollar piece of hardware, but then you need a 20 dollar a month sub…”
Suster: Pure software-only VC investing strategy is not realistic for the future
“So, I think VCs just got a little too comfortable that every investment they were gonna do was software only, and I just don't think that's realistic for the future.”
Mark Suster notes 2021 software multiples hit 25x against historical 10x
“So, people were paying in twenty-twenty-one 25 times next 12 month revenue, ok? Over the last 10 years, they were paying just under 10 times.”
Suster says 20-percent growth software startups currently trade at 4x revenue
“But the twenty-year average is six X. And right now, if you're growing at 20%, you're probably trading at Forex.”
Suster: Going public without analyst coverage and institutional support is worse than staying private
“Going public, if you don't have coverage, and you don't have an institutional base that wants to invest in you, like, is worse than being private. Because you now have a fixed market cap that doesn't go up. You don't really have liquidity.”
Mark Suster predicts mega tech M&A remains dead regardless of elections
“The FTC has not been looking too kindly on these mega deals. And so I think the mega deals just aren't going to happen for a period of time. I don't know what will happen post November, but even either administration, I'm not convinced they're suddenly going t…”
Suster: Disciplined valuations leave startups a much larger pool of potential acquirers
“There's a ton of companies that can acquire businesses for 100 to five hundred million dollars. There's not so many who can acquire it for two billion or five billion. So if you're disciplined as an investor, if you're disciplined as a founder, and you're fund…”
Suster: Defense tech startups like Anduril are critical for future warfare
“I would argue that's why companies like Anduril are so important, because the future battleground are going to require a new type of weapon, a new type of defense system, that if we don't develop it, the Russians will, the Chinese will, the Koreans will, and I…”