LPs
8 statements across 7 episodes · 3 bullish · 3 bearish · 7 people on the record · first statement Mar 8, 2024 by David Weisburd · across every show →
Everything said about LPs, oldest first
Mar 8, 2024 neutral
Weisburd: LPs lack true returns data to evaluate VCs until Fund 4
“What's kind of crazy about VC is that you don't really know until fund four. Why is that? Because you typically are raising in two, three year increments. So you don't really know. You don't really have DPI until let's say fund three. So you don't know. You do…”
Mar 8, 2024 neutral
Weisburd: DPI is ground truth for VC returns, but a lagging indicator
“So I think DPI is important. And DPI is kind of like ground truth. Like it's an equalizer. You could be the worst marketer in the world, but eventually like your DPI will catch up. Right? So it is a great equalizer is the most empirical fact, but it is a highl…”
Jun 14, 2024 negative
Walk: Raising larger venture funds without structural planning hurts LPs and founders
“Like all of those are implications that I think actually when venture firms don't consider and they just raise more money and then figure it out as they go, like are bad for LPs and bad for founders and thus bad for those firms.”
Sep 20, 2024 negative
Alter: VC firms shouldn't be political because LP metrics are completely objective
“VC has real metrics. Like we have numbers on a page that we're showing to our LPs that we are accountable for. And obviously, you know, sometimes those investing cycles can be long. So sometimes it takes a little bit of time for the numbers to really be clear,…”
Jan 30, 2025 positive
Ritter: LPs Know Real Venture Returns Come from Early Stage, Not Late Stage
“Most of the LPs that are backing this segment, the venture capital segment, know that the real returns come from early stage and later stage is great, but it's a different, it's closer to their buyout category than it is to their what they call venture capital…”
May 5, 2025 negative
Mar 9, 2026 positive
Lin: Sequoia measures success by LP distributions, not AUM
“The thing that we measure is being a net liquidity provider to our LPs. So we believe in alignment of interests, and we think about founders first, then LPs, then Sequoia, then our team, and then ourselves. And when you do that, we actually measure how much we…”