Brigit founder Zuben Matthews details the profitability of overdraft fee revenue for major US retail banks.
Assertion Supported
US banks generated $30B annually in overdraft fees around 2018
“The reality is when we started our company, banks, We're making about thirty billion dollars in overdraw fees. Thirty billion dollars.”
Assertion Partly supported
Average bank overdraft borrowers paid $69 to borrow $70 for four days
“What we saw Was the average overdraft borrowing was only about 70 dollars, and people were overdrafting twice, so paying about 68, 69 dollars in fees for a matter of four days of borrowing.”
Assertion Supported
Paycheck-to-paycheck Americans pay up to 80% of bank overdraft fees
“And then you start to see who's paying 80% or 75% of those fees, who's paying Is it people who've got 10,000 dollars in their bank account who just made a mistake and didn't transfer money from one place to the other? It's not. It's the hundred plus million Am…”
Opinion
Bank cash flow data outperforms FICO for underwriting short-term mismatches
“That is why cash flow data, the information in someone's bank account relative to the old school FICO or your TransUnion Experian Equifax credit score, I would argue is far more useful for this use case, and which is the only core piece of technology that our …”
Opinion
Matthews argues bank overdraft fees are more expensive than payday loans
“I would argue overdrafts are more expensive, but payday lenders tend to have a different way of looking at the world as well.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
In-house cash-flow underwriting restricts Brigit's fraud to under 20 basis points
“The underwriting and the fraud tools that we, we've built all in-house, combined with the data that we use, again, only cash flow, help us restrict fraud to well under, the way we would define it, under, it was 20 bips of all our losses.”