The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Levie: Companies will blow billions training models instantly supplanted by Meta's Llama
“There'll be lots of companies that just blow billions of dollars doing, you know, training runs of a model that get, you know, supplanted instantly by Lama.”
Morin: DeepSeek validates Meta's open-source strategy by feeding advances back
“This DeepSeek thing is exactly what we were talking about, that by releasing Llama, you know, DeepSeek surely used it, and many others, sounds like, and the fruits of that win come back to Meta, like, overnight, right? And they can plug it back in and make mor…”
Sam Lessin: Meta's Lack of a Simple Llama API Is a Strategic Mistake
“And like, the thing about LOM or anything is like, there just doesn't exist. Like someone will package that eventually, but like, they don't prioritize that. I actually think it's a strategic mistake. I think they should, purely for developer mindshare, not as…”