why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Schulhoff: LLMs Rely More on Prompt Structure Than Exemplar Labels
“There are a number of papers which have found that the label of the exemplar doesn't really matter, and the model reads the exemplars and cares more about structure than label.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Schulhoff: DSPy Beat 20 Hours of Manual Prompt Engineering in 10 Minutes
“And then I spent 20 hours prompt engineering for a task, and Dyspy beat me in 10 minutes, and that's when I changed my mind.”
Assertion Supported
Schulhoff: Preamble Discovered Prompt Injection Before Riley Goodside
“Preamble is the company that first discovered Prompt Injection, even before Riley, and they, like, responsibly disclosed it, kind of, internally to OpenAI”
Assertion Supported
Schulhoff: Few-Shot Exemplar Order Can Shift Model Accuracy From 0% to 90%
“How you order your exemplars in the prompt is super important. And we've seen this move accuracy from like zero percent to 90%, like Zero to state of the art on some tasks, which is just ridiculous”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Schulhoff: GPT-4 Fails to Output Reasoning on 1 in 100 to 1,000 Prompts
“I remember I did a lot of experiments with GPT-IV, and especially when you look at it at scale, so I'll run thousands of prompts against it through the API, and I'll see, you know, every one in a hundred, every one in a thousand outputs no reasoning whatsoever…”
Assertion Supported
Schulhoff: arXiv prohibits and removes undisclosed AI-generated papers
“I found AI-generated papers on Archive, and I flagged them to their staff, and they were like, thank you know, we missed these.
Wait, Archive takes them down?
Yeah.
Oh, I didn't know that.
You can't post an AI-generated paper there, especially
If you don't say…”
Assertion Supported
Schulhoff: Self-consistency prompting yields diminishing returns on newer LLMs
“When it came out, it seemed to be quite performant, although more recently, I think as the models have improved, the
Performance of this technique has dropped, and you can see that in the evals we run near the end of the paper, where we use it, and it doesn't …”