why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Opinion
Shah: Meta and LinkedIn keep social and professional graphs aggressively closed
“Right now our information, all of us nodes are in the social graph at Meta or the professional graph at LinkedIn, both of which are actually relatively closed and actually very annoying ways. Like very, very closed, right? Especially LinkedIn.”
Opinion
Park: Facebook data better captures human baseline state than LinkedIn or Twitter
“If we were to look at purely social media, like if you really, you know, if I were, you know, if I had to really pick, Facebook likely is interesting because I actually do think it is most sort of a default version of people because you go to LinkedIn, it's ve…”
Assertion Supported
Nadella says LinkedIn merged design, PM, and engineering into full stack builders
“At LinkedIn, they did structurally change and, you know, basically built up a new discipline called full stack builder, right? So they went and said, hey, let's bring people from design and product management, front end engineering, all put them together but a…”
Opinion
Conover: LLMs enable knowledge graphs more granular than Bloomberg or LinkedIn
“We believe that there's an opportunity to create a knowledge graph that has resolution that greatly exceeds what any You know, whether it's Bloomberg or LinkedIn currently has access to where we're getting as granular as person X submitted congressional testim…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Single LinkedIn posts from large AI pages drove $3,000 MRR spikes
“Basically like I would have like this maybe big AI page post about chat base, and I would see Stripe like maybe a few hours later go up by like 3000 MRR from just that one post.”