Goyal: AI workloads are roughly 25% simple agents and 25% advanced agents
Ankur Goyal · Production AI Engineering starts with Evals · Oct 11, 2024 · at 1:41:21
Ankur Goyal is the founder and CEO of Braintrust. He explains the breakdown of agentic generative AI workloads running in production.
0:00 / 0:33exact quote · 33.7s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“I'd say like probably 25% of the remaining usage is what you could call like a simple agent. Which is probably, you know, a prompt plus some tools. At least one or perhaps the only tool is a rag type of tool, and it is kind of like an enhanced, you know, chatbot or whatever that interacts with someone. Then I'd say probably the remaining 25% are what I would say are like advanced agents, which are things that maybe run for a long period of time or have a loop or, you know, do something more than that sort of simple but effective paradigm.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Ankur Goyal
Goyal: Running LLM workloads at scale is impractical outside OpenAI
“It's just not practical outside of OpenAI to run use cases at scale in a lot of cases. Like, you can do it, but it requires quite a bit of work. And
Because OpenAI is so good at making their models so available, I think they get a lot of credit for the science…”
Goyal: Agent control flow and graph routing will move into models
“It feels very clear to me that this type of logic is going to be built into the model. Anytime there is control flow complexity or uncertainty complexity, I think the history of AI has been to push more and more into the model.”
Goyal: OpenAI o1 will make agentic frameworks obsolete
“And I think O-one is going to do that to agentic frameworks as well. Hey, I think To me, it seems very unlikely that the, you know, you and me sort of like sipping an espresso and thinking about how, like, different personified roles of people should interact …”
Goyal: Open-source inference providers are far less reliable than OpenAI
“They are nowhere near as reliable as, I mean, every single time I use any of those products and run a benchmark, I find a bug, text the CEO, and they fix something. It's nowhere near where OpenAI is.”
Goyal: Publishing Public Benchmarks Is Marketing, Not Product Improvement
“It's just that the value proposition of publishing an eval is completely orthogonal to the value proposition of building evals in service of building a good product. I think the purpose of publishing benchmarks is marketing, and it's good marketing.”
Goyal: Providing eval criteria and examples is more effective than writing specs
“In many ways coming to the table of product building with representative examples and criteria that articulate what good versus bad is for a use case is just a more precise and usable form of product management than writing a spec.”