The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Steve Yegge no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Partly raw tape D 3 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 3.70

Q Um, how, how do you see that in the future? Like, do you see a lot of Cody's running together at the same time? Like, how do you, how do you validate also that they're not messing each other up as they make changes in, in the code? And maybe what are the limitations today, and what do you think about where the attack is going?

A I want to start with a little history and then I'm going to turn it over to beyond. All right. So we actually had this feature in the very first launch back in June, Dominic wrote it. It was called non-stop Cody and you could have multiple, uh, basically LLM requests in parallel modifying your source file. And he wrote a bunch of codes to handle all of the diffing logic. And you could see the regions of code that the LLM was going to change. Right. And, uh, and he was showing me demos of it and it just felt like it was just a little before its time. You know? But, ah, a bunch of that stuff, that scaffolding was able to be reused for, ah, for where, where inline sitting today. Where would you, where, how would you characterize it today?

AI assessment note: “we actually had this feature in the very first launch back in June”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.