The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

John V no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60

Q Maybe this transitions to the business side. How close is this to problems that, you know, you guys do consulting, right? Effectively. I don't know if that's the hacker word for it. Like how is this, does this match what you do for work?

A Yeah, I'll, I'll, I'll take this one. In a sense. Yeah. There's been some partnerships, you know, plenty, obviously being sort of the poster boy for AI machine learning hackers, the world over, but we get some interesting opportunities that come across the desk. And oftentimes, you know, we, we have an ethos in our hacker collective. Which is radical transparency and radical open source. And what that basically means is if it comes down to, you know, us being an emerging technology is like red team doing like ethical hacking and research and development. If an organization that's on the frontier says, well, we really want you to test this or check this out, kick the tires, give us feedback, poke holes in it, whatever. But in the contract, it says you can't kiss and tell. And we said, well, we really want you to open source the data. And then they say, well, then we don't really want you to come kick the tires anymore. Well, if it's between us touching the latest and greatest tech to explore it and push the limits, right. Then we're going to do that. So we're open source up until we can't be, that's the best way I describe it. We, but we often push for open source data sets. And you can see this with some of the partnerships that we've had in the past. Right. So Yeah. I try to think of it like this. It's like you have these, these multi-billion dollar companies and they're build…

AI assessment note: “In a sense. Yeah. There's been some partnerships”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.