Q get to open frontiers, but one more question about just the NSF, which I think you, uh, you mentioned once for, for about Databricks, but also I think you're trying to target the LOD grants as sort of NSF level prestige and, and, and, and impact. I think one thing I, maybe it's like a spicy question is, well, what's broken about the NSF process are you trying to fix?
A Uh, I don't think NSF is broken. I love NSF. It has been probably the best investment the American popular public has ever made. Thousands X return on their investments. I mentioned Google earlier, Databricks, all these researchers came from NSF funding, and it's just been A paradigm generation. So DARPA was important for, at some point, there's been these, these paradigm shifts in how open research has been funded. DARPA was a key one. NSF's been a key one. And now NSF is not, is not big enough. It was one billion dollars a year for computer science and that they're trying to cut that into half of that, but we need 10 to a hundred billion dollars to do frontier AI research. So it's not broken. They are trying to break it. You need more is insufficient.
AI assessment note: “I don't think NSF is broken. I love NSF.”